Asteroid could hit Mars

General physics and astronomy discussions not directly related to Celestia
Topic author
abramson
Posts: 408
Joined: 22.07.2003
With us: 21 years 4 months
Location: Bariloche, Argentina

Asteroid could hit Mars

Post #1by abramson » 21.12.2007, 18:50

I have just read that a 100m asteroid, recently discovered, is passing very close to Mars on January 30th, and could even hit the planet (actually, close to Opportunity!). Wouldn't it be so cool?

I read it here: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22350742/

Regards,

Guillermo

Avatar
cartrite
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.09.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months
Location: Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA Greate Grandfother from Irshava, Zakarpattia Oblast Ukraine

Post #2by cartrite » 21.12.2007, 19:22

If it does hit, It would be really cool to see the hirise images from the impact site. About a foot per pixel resolution.
cartrite
VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Intel(R) UHD Graphics 8gb ram. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 CPU @ 1.00GHz, 1190 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s) 8 GB ram. Running on Windows 11 and OpenSuse 15.4

symaski62
Posts: 610
Joined: 01.05.2004
Age: 41
With us: 20 years 6 months
Location: france, divion

Post #3by symaski62 » 21.12.2007, 20:14

^^ 2007 WD5 :wink:

Code: Select all

*******************************************************************************
Ephemeris / WWW_USER Fri Dec 21 12:09:47 2007  Pasadena, USA     / Horizons   
*******************************************************************************
Target body name: (2007 WD5)                      {source: JPL#5}
Center body name: Mars (499)                      {source: DE405}
Center-site name: (user defined site below)
*******************************************************************************
Start time      : A.D. 2008-Jan-30 00:00:00.0000 UT     
Stop  time      : A.D. 2008-Jan-31 00:00:00.0000 UT     
Step-size       : 60 minutes
*******************************************************************************
Target pole/equ : No model available
Target radii    : (unavailable)                                               
Center geodetic : .000000000,.000000000,.00100000 {E-lon(deg),Lat(deg),Alt(km)}
Center cylindric: .000000000,3396.19100,.00000000 {E-lon(deg),Dxy(km),Dz(km)}
Center pole/equ : IAU_MARS                        {East-longitude -}
Center radii    : 3396.2 x 3396.2 x 3376.2 km     {Equator, meridian, pole}   
Target primary  : Sun                             {source: DE405}
Interfering body: PHOBOS (Req= 13.400) km         {source: MAR063}
Deflecting body : Sun, MARS                       {source: DE405}
Deflecting GMs  : 1.3271E+11, 4.2828E+04 km^3/s^2                             
Small perturbers: Ceres, Pallas, Vesta            {source: SB405-CPV-2}
Small body GMs  : 6.32E+01, 1.43E+01, 1.78E+01 km^3/s^2                       
Atmos refraction: NO (AIRLESS)
RA format       : HMS
Time format     : CAL
EOP file        : eop.071220.p080312                                           
EOP coverage    : DATA-BASED 1962-JAN-20 TO 2007-DEC-20. PREDICTS-> 2008-MAR-11
Units conversion: 1 AU= 149597870.691 km, c= 299792.458 km/s, 1 day= 86400.0 s
Table cut-offs 1: Elevation (-90.0deg=NO ),Airmass     n.a.    , Daylight (NO )
Table cut-offs 2: Solar Elongation (  0.0,180.0=NO )                           
*******************************************************************************
Initial FK5/J2000.0 heliocentric ecliptic osculating elements (AU, DAYS, DEG):
  EPOCH=  2454431.5 ! 2007-Nov-27.00 (CT)         Residual RMS= .31589         
    EC= .6040384243403829  QR= 1.010180751137961  TP= 2454392.142439703       
    OM= 67.42492617988871  W= 312.8131037686367   IN= 2.380514516503237       
Asteroid physical parameters (KM, SEC, rotational period in hours):
    GM= n.a.               RAD= n.a.              ROTPER= n.a.                 
    H= 24.28               G= .150                B-V= n.a.                   
                           ALBEDO= n.a.           STYP= n.a.                   
*******************************************************************************************************
 Date__(UT)__HR:MN     R.A._(ICRF/J2000.0)_DEC  APmag            delta      deldot    S-O-T /r    S-T-O
*******************************************************************************************************
$$SOE
 2008-Jan-30 00:00  x  20 15 59.74 -23 05 00.8   n.a. .002804719711977 -12.6078245  11.3999 /T 168.5802
 2008-Jan-30 01:00  x  20 20 07.79 -22 51 50.2   n.a. .002501204313748 -12.6122813  12.3488 /T 167.6321
 2008-Jan-30 02:00     20 25 14.74 -22 33 55.7   n.a. .002197856730086 -12.5927273  13.5356 /T 166.4460
 2008-Jan-30 03:00 *   20 31 46.85 -22 08 54.3   n.a. .001895348430440 -12.5407187  15.0702 /T 164.9122
 2008-Jan-30 04:00 *   20 40 29.94 -21 32 29.8   n.a. .001594621467705 -12.4411757  17.1461 /T 162.8370
 2008-Jan-30 05:00 *   20 52 49.99 -20 36 12.2   n.a. .001297158511714 -12.2612814  20.1328 /T 159.8511
 2008-Jan-30 06:00 *   21 11 45.19 -19 00 44.7   n.a. .001005748199322 -11.9152926  24.8152 /T 155.1696
 2008-Jan-30 07:00 *   21 44 16.15 -15 54 18.0   n.a. .000727016085215 -11.1281210  33.1205 /T 146.8652
 2008-Jan-30 08:00 *x  22 49 16.04 -08 31 11.3   n.a. .000481769798193  -8.7891854  50.5718 /T 129.4148
 2008-Jan-30 09:00 *x  01 07 49.05 +09 15 35.6  11.23 .000346773378830  -1.2123327  89.3287 /T  90.6588
 2008-Jan-30 10:00 *x  03 58 51.46 +24 36 47.5  10.31 .000436874171221   7.6581156 132.7366 /T  47.2518
 2008-Jan-30 11:00 *x  05 31 18.62 +27 30 30.9  10.63 .000664438042518  10.6270115 153.6088 /T  26.3806
 2008-Jan-30 12:00 *x  06 14 27.12 +27 30 31.0  11.07 .000932677643483  11.5113598 163.1069 /T  16.8833
 2008-Jan-30 13:00 *   06 37 37.26 +27 08 03.6  11.46 .001214298433758  11.8480579 168.1980 /T  11.7931
 2008-Jan-30 14:00 *   06 51 40.53 +26 45 48.2  11.80 .001501532126970  12.0080032 171.2808 /T   8.7110
 2008-Jan-30 15:00     07 00 56.58 +26 26 51.2  12.09 .001791705217413  12.1028352 173.3023 /T   6.6901
 2008-Jan-30 16:00     07 07 25.11 +26 11 07.3  12.35 .002083821350607  12.1737340 174.7002 /T   5.2929
 2008-Jan-30 17:00     07 12 08.41 +25 58 04.0  12.59 .002377538769141  12.2377370 175.7026 /T   4.2910
 2008-Jan-30 18:00     07 15 42.10 +25 47 11.8  12.80 .002672789220972  12.3018480 176.4402 /T   3.5538
 2008-Jan-30 19:00  x  07 18 28.10 +25 38 07.9  12.99 .002969607980616  12.3681988 176.9927 /T   3.0017
 2008-Jan-30 20:00  x  07 20 40.72 +25 30 35.1  13.18 .003268046820804  12.4362831 177.4114 /T   2.5833
 2008-Jan-30 21:00  x  07 22 29.69 +25 24 20.2  13.34 .003568125657249  12.5041043 177.7300 /T   2.2650
 2008-Jan-30 22:00  x  07 24 01.86 +25 19 12.4  13.50 .003869805706887  12.5688767 177.9708 /T   2.0243
 2008-Jan-30 23:00  x  07 25 22.08 +25 15 02.6  13.66 .004172976743538  12.6275199 178.1490 /T   1.8462
 2008-Jan-31 00:00     07 26 33.86 +25 11 42.7  13.80 .004477454756676  12.6770386 178.2746 /L   1.7207
$$EOE
*******************************************************************************************************
windows 10 directX 12 version
celestia 1.7.0 64 bits
with a general handicap of 80% and it makes much d' efforts for the community and s' expimer, thank you d' to be understanding.

Sky Guy
Posts: 13
Joined: 14.11.2006
With us: 18 years
Location: Palomar Mountain

Post #4by Sky Guy » 21.12.2007, 21:45

Currently a 1 - 75 chance. More observations should clear this up.

buggs_moran
Posts: 835
Joined: 27.09.2004
With us: 20 years 1 month
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Post #5by buggs_moran » 22.12.2007, 02:08

I get about 50,000 km using ephemeris from Horizons/JPL, wheeee!

Image

Code: Select all

"2007WD5" "Sol"
{
   Texture          "asteroid.jpg"
   Mesh      "asteroid.cms"
   Radius      0.10

   EllipticalOrbit
   {
   Epoch            2454456.5 #Dec 22, 2007
   Period      4.07480867
   SemiMajorAxis   2.551094199056971
   Eccentricity   0.604013874102269
   Inclination      2.380481303233174
   AscendingNode   67.42476284804459
   ArgOfPericenter    312.8153100391182
   MeanAnomaly      15.56711658243930
   }

}


cel://Follow/Sol:2007WD5/2008-01-30T09: ... 1200&ver=2
Homebrew:
WinXP Pro SP2
Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe
AMD Athlon XP 3000/333 2.16 GHz
1 GB Crucial RAM
80 GB WD SATA drive
ATI AIW 9600XT 128M

Avatar
Hungry4info
Posts: 1133
Joined: 11.09.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months
Location: Indiana, United States

Post #6by Hungry4info » 23.12.2007, 06:44

Sucks to be Mars, eh?

Well, if it hits, wonderful. If it doesn't, wonderful. I haven't decided which I would prefer. I guess a hit would be pretty cool. Asteroid impacts have a way of ruining one's day though, and it wouldn't be all to great for unforseen aspects of an impact to affect our operations there. i.e. debris flying into orbit, being a hazard to orbiring spacecraft.

I don't know if that's possible, but the thought came to mind.
Current Setup:
Windows 7 64 bit. Celestia 1.6.0.
AMD Athlon Processor, 1.6 Ghz, 3 Gb RAM
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics

Avatar
LordFerret M
Posts: 737
Joined: 24.08.2006
Age: 68
With us: 18 years 3 months
Location: NJ USA

Post #7by LordFerret » 23.12.2007, 08:16

Passing that close to Mars, how come nobody is asking about the possible change to its trajectory/orbit due to Mars' gravity? Will it be passing Sol-side or space-side (?terminology?)... or will that even matter at all?

Avatar
Hungry4info
Posts: 1133
Joined: 11.09.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months
Location: Indiana, United States

Post #8by Hungry4info » 23.12.2007, 14:31

I think somebody asked about tha ton the Bad Astronomy forum. The reply was something like "There are thousands of potentially hazardous asteroids, and you're going to worry about just one? If 2007WD5 misses Mars, you'll never hear a word from it again." I would potentially agree. The odds are low that the asteroid's orbit will be placed into an orbit that could result in an impact with anything. I'm not saying it's impossible though.
Current Setup:
Windows 7 64 bit. Celestia 1.6.0.
AMD Athlon Processor, 1.6 Ghz, 3 Gb RAM
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics

Fightspit
Posts: 510
Joined: 15.05.2005
With us: 19 years 6 months

Post #9by Fightspit » 29.12.2007, 12:10

New info from NASA about the hit:

Mars Impact Probability Increases to 4 Percent
The impact probability for a collision of asteroid 2007 WD5 with Mars on January 30 has increased from 1.3% to 3.9%. Pre-discovery observations of asteroid 2007 WD5, taken on November 8, 2007 have allowed its orbit to be refined and the uncertainties for the late January Mars encounter have been improved. The impact probability resulting from the recent orbit refinement has increased to a surprising 3.9% (about 1 in 25 odds).


More info here:
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news153.html
Motherboard: Intel D975XBX2
Processor: Intel Core2 E6700 @ 3Ghz
Ram: Corsair 2 x 1GB DDR2 PC6400
Video Card: Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB GDDR3 384 bits PCI-Express 16x
HDD: Western Digital Raptor 150GB 10000 rpm
OS: Windows Vista Business 32 bits

Fightspit
Posts: 510
Joined: 15.05.2005
With us: 19 years 6 months

Post #10by Fightspit » 05.01.2008, 19:38

Update! 2 January:

New Observations Slightly Decrease Mars Impact Probability

Additional position observations for asteroid 2007 WD5 taken on December 29 through January 2 have been used to improve the accuracy of the asteroid's orbit. As a result, the range of possible paths past Mars has narrowed by a factor of 3 and the most likely path has moved a little farther away from the planet, causing the Mars impact probability to decrease slightly to 3.6% (about one chance in 28 ).



Image

More info here:
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news154.html
Motherboard: Intel D975XBX2
Processor: Intel Core2 E6700 @ 3Ghz
Ram: Corsair 2 x 1GB DDR2 PC6400
Video Card: Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB GDDR3 384 bits PCI-Express 16x
HDD: Western Digital Raptor 150GB 10000 rpm
OS: Windows Vista Business 32 bits

phoenix
Posts: 214
Joined: 18.06.2002
With us: 22 years 5 months
Location: Germany - Berlin

Post #11by phoenix » 06.01.2008, 01:25

LordFerret wrote:Passing that close to Mars, how come nobody is asking about the possible change to its trajectory/orbit due to Mars' gravity? Will it be passing Sol-side or space-side (?terminology?)... or will that even matter at all?


I highly doubt that an asteroid of this size would do anything to mars itself except for making a nice new impact crater ;-)

if he hits - yay! give us some cool HD photos or even videos of it.
if it misses - where will it go?
this very close flyby would probably change is orbit quite a bit.
most recent celestia win32-SVN-build - use at your own risk (copy over existing 1.5.1 release)

Avatar
Hungry4info
Posts: 1133
Joined: 11.09.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months
Location: Indiana, United States

Post #12by Hungry4info » 06.01.2008, 07:27

phoenix wrote:
LordFerret wrote:Passing that close to Mars, how come nobody is asking about the possible change to its trajectory/orbit due to Mars' gravity? Will it be passing Sol-side or space-side (?terminology?)... or will that even matter at all?
I highly doubt that an asteroid of this size would do anything to mars itself except for making a nice new impact crater ;-)


I'm rather certain he was asking about Mars' effect on the asteroid, not the other way around. :wink:
Current Setup:
Windows 7 64 bit. Celestia 1.6.0.
AMD Athlon Processor, 1.6 Ghz, 3 Gb RAM
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics

Fightspit
Posts: 510
Joined: 15.05.2005
With us: 19 years 6 months

Post #13by Fightspit » 10.01.2008, 12:45

Oh no! Another update again :wink:

2007 WD5 Mars Collision Effectively Ruled Out - Impact Odds now 1 in 10,000
Since our last update, we have received numerous tracking measurements of asteroid 2007 WD5 from four different observatories. These new data have led to a significant reduction in the position uncertainties during the asteroid's close approach to Mars on Jan. 30, 2008. As a result, the impact probability has dropped dramatically, to approximately 0.01% or 1 in 10,000 odds, effectively ruling out the possible collision with Mars.


Full story here:
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news156.html

Image
Motherboard: Intel D975XBX2
Processor: Intel Core2 E6700 @ 3Ghz
Ram: Corsair 2 x 1GB DDR2 PC6400
Video Card: Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB GDDR3 384 bits PCI-Express 16x
HDD: Western Digital Raptor 150GB 10000 rpm
OS: Windows Vista Business 32 bits

MKruer
Posts: 501
Joined: 18.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months

Post #14by MKruer » 10.01.2008, 14:44

I demand that NASA launch an emergency mission to mars to push the asteroid 2007 WD5 back on target. :twisted:

I want see this happed in in real time.
Image
This would be approximately the size of the impact. Basically a city killer. Talk about urban renewal. :twisted:

http://www.meteorcrater.com/index.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteor_Crater

Avatar
Hungry4info
Posts: 1133
Joined: 11.09.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months
Location: Indiana, United States

Post #15by Hungry4info » 10.01.2008, 16:12

Seriously, is anyone surprised? The odds were low anyway. Sure they were high compared to the usual near-miss, but we shouldn't be surprised.
Current Setup:
Windows 7 64 bit. Celestia 1.6.0.
AMD Athlon Processor, 1.6 Ghz, 3 Gb RAM
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics

BobHegwood
Posts: 1803
Joined: 12.10.2007
With us: 17 years 1 month

Post #16by BobHegwood » 10.01.2008, 16:41

Hungry4info wrote:Seriously, is anyone surprised? The odds were
low anyway. Sure they were high compared to the usual near-miss,
but we shouldn't be surprised.


No surprise at all here, but it really would be nice to see the actual
effects of a collision with this relatively small asteroid. Would be
very nice to obtain some data from which more general impact
information could be derived. Yes? :wink:
Brain-Dead Geezer Bob is now using...
Windows Vista Home Premium, 64-bit on a
Gateway Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5200, 2.5GHz
7 GB RAM, 500 GB hard disk, Nvidia GeForce 7100
Nvidia nForce 630i, 1680x1050 screen, Latest SVN

Avatar
LordFerret M
Posts: 737
Joined: 24.08.2006
Age: 68
With us: 18 years 3 months
Location: NJ USA

Post #17by LordFerret » 11.01.2008, 06:39

phoenix wrote:
LordFerret wrote:Passing that close to Mars, how come nobody is asking about the possible change to its trajectory/orbit due to Mars' gravity? Will it be passing Sol-side or space-side (?terminology?)... or will that even matter at all?

I highly doubt that an asteroid of this size would do anything to mars itself except for making a nice new impact crater ;-)

if he hits - yay! give us some cool HD photos or even videos of it.
if it misses - where will it go?
this very close flyby would probably change is orbit quite a bit.

That's exactly what I was wondering about (marked in red). All this discussion about the possibility of it hitting... should it not, it's going to pass very close. Mars's gravity only being 0.376 of Earth's (1.0), it should still have some kind of influence on this object. That's why I'm asking where will it be passing (inside its orbit or outside as it were)? Which direction will its altered trajectory swing?

Just curious.

MKruer
Posts: 501
Joined: 18.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months

Post #18by MKruer » 11.01.2008, 06:48

LordFerret, The asteroid is one of the few that cross Earth and Mars, this is an incredibly high precision trajectory. If anything this will remove it as an Earth crossing asteroid. Don't get me wrong, it will still come into the inner solar system (closer to the sun then earth, but it would be out of alignment to hit Earth.

Avatar
Hungry4info
Posts: 1133
Joined: 11.09.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months
Location: Indiana, United States

Post #19by Hungry4info » 11.01.2008, 14:00

Unless I am misinterpreting what I see in Celestia, 2007 WD5's orbit does not cross Earth's, but it does come close. I would guess that the asteroid will be thrown into a trajectory that'll make it an Earth and Mars crosser.
Current Setup:
Windows 7 64 bit. Celestia 1.6.0.
AMD Athlon Processor, 1.6 Ghz, 3 Gb RAM
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics

Avatar
LordFerret M
Posts: 737
Joined: 24.08.2006
Age: 68
With us: 18 years 3 months
Location: NJ USA

Post #20by LordFerret » 13.01.2008, 06:55

Thanks MKruer, not that I was all that concerned about it with regard to Earth. I'll imagine then that its new orbital parameters are something which will not be known with any precision until after it is well past Mars and Mars' gravitational influence. That thought is based on something Fridger just recently mentioned about the complexities involved in n-body calculations. I'm sure this object will be watched now for some time to come. It will be interesting to see what becomes of it. :D


Return to “Physics and Astronomy”