Small, potentially water-bearing exoplanet

General physics and astronomy discussions not directly related to Celestia
AlexChan
Posts: 33
Joined: 29.09.2004
With us: 20 years 2 months

Post #21by AlexChan » 26.04.2007, 01:52

Planet X & Bdm, Thanks you.
But also sorry to Bdm, I am not 100% understand about how to use software to get that result.
Because my English not good at all.

Anyway, I am wondering and imaging the world where sky look purple or green :)


BTW, I put the Earth in this system :twisted:
And according to Planet X, (I finished before I saw Bdm post)
this is a purple sky and pink clouds Earth

Image

bh
Posts: 1547
Joined: 17.12.2002
With us: 21 years 11 months
Location: Oxford, England

Post #22by bh » 26.04.2007, 07:10

Okay... downloaded and installed latest extrasolar.ssc but I can't locate and go to Gliese 581! Celestia says 'object not found'... help please. V 1.4.1.
regards...bh.

ajtribick
Developer
Posts: 1855
Joined: 11.08.2003
With us: 21 years 3 months

Post #23by ajtribick » 26.04.2007, 09:14

Further advantage of the third planet of this system - the planet's orbit is quite similar to Mercury's in terms of eccentricity and period, which suggests to me that the planet may not be 1:1 synchronised with its orbit, but could be in a 3:2 state. In this case, the planet would have a day-night cycle of around 170 days. This would also cause very weird climate zones, depending on which parts of the planet were facing the star at periastron and apastron.

eburacum45
Posts: 691
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 21 years

Post #24by eburacum45 » 28.04.2007, 06:32

This paper is very interesting;
http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/ ... 3454v1.pdf
it is written by two of the authors who supplied the rule of thumb which supplied the popularly-quoted radius, Valencia and Sasselov.
But this one is much more comprehensive, it seems to me; it gives a wide range of densities and radiuses, all dependent on a tripartite division of components between metallic core, rocky mantle, and watery hydrosphere.
A feasible waterworld could be as much as 80% water according to this paper.

There seem to be two different models for the formation of worlds like Gl 581 c; if it formed in the dry inner part of the solar nebula, it would be mostly metallic core and rocky mantle; the maximum feasible density (according to the paper) gives a planet with 65% metallic core, 35% mantle, minimal water, a diameter of 1.5 Earth's and a gravity of 2.2 gees.
The other model concerns a Neptune-like ice core world which formed beyond the snow line, and migrated inwards; the minimum density (80% water) gives a radius twice Earth's and a gravity of 1.2 gees.

Two very different worlds; I don't know if there is any way to distinguish them at this stage.

eburacum45
Posts: 691
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 21 years

Post #25by eburacum45 » 28.04.2007, 14:14

Hmm; Currently Wikipedia agrees with me; perhaps someone else has read that paper.


Return to “Physics and Astronomy”