New accretion disk method (WORK IN PROGRESS)

Post requests, images, descriptions and reports about work in progress here.
Avatar
Topic author
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Montreal

Post #21by Cham » 06.03.2007, 22:15

Drop a couple of high resolution pebbles in there, and you may have a very nice view 8)

Image

Image

Image

Image
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

Dollan
Posts: 1150
Joined: 18.12.2003
Age: 54
With us: 20 years 11 months
Location: Havre, Montana

Post #22by Dollan » 06.03.2007, 22:48

Can you post an example ssc file? The original ssc testbed has a bunch of symbols in it which, for some reason, my computer cannot recognize.

There are some *great* possibilities with this stuff!!

...John...
"To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe..."
--Carl Sagan

eburacum45
Posts: 691
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 21 years

Post #23by eburacum45 » 07.03.2007, 14:16

Two possibilities I can think of, for use in the Orion's Arm Universe; a spherical dyson swarm (which at the moment I have modelled using thousands of tiny tetrahedra, but it is still much too grainy) and a dyson swarm made of nested tori, as suggested by Bob Jenkins
Bob Jenkins has a page about his concept here
http://burtleburtle.net/bob/scifi/dyson.html

the OA image I have made for the 'nested tori' concept is here
http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/5873/jenkinszg4.jpg
and for a spherical dyson swarm I have made this image
http://www.orionsarm.com/civ/dysons.jpg
but a particle based image would be so much better.
Could a non-flattened torus be possible?

Jolly nice for making T Tauri stars, too.

Avatar
Topic author
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Montreal

Post #24by Cham » 08.03.2007, 00:51

GRAVITY TURNED MAD ! :mrgreen:

Image

Image

Image

An early attempt at introducing tidal waves and turbulence in the rings. The perturbation has a much too strong amplitude. :oops:
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Post #25by ElChristou » 08.03.2007, 01:12

Cham wrote:GRAVITY TURNED MAD ! :mrgreen:


Indeed... :twisted:
Image

Avatar
Topic author
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Montreal

Post #26by Cham » 08.03.2007, 05:22

Another experiment : Thick shell of dust. Preparing for the first true 3D volumetric nebula (planetary nebulae at first). Of course, this is just a preliminary. I'll add all sorts of thickness variations, colors, cold dark clouds, etc. Can't wait for Chris's implementation of sprites for the fuzzy and continuous rendering...

Image
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

Fightspit
Posts: 510
Joined: 15.05.2005
With us: 19 years 6 months

Post #27by Fightspit » 08.03.2007, 15:31

Can you reproduce a star which explode 8O :?:
Motherboard: Intel D975XBX2
Processor: Intel Core2 E6700 @ 3Ghz
Ram: Corsair 2 x 1GB DDR2 PC6400
Video Card: Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB GDDR3 384 bits PCI-Express 16x
HDD: Western Digital Raptor 150GB 10000 rpm
OS: Windows Vista Business 32 bits

FaLLeN_SOuL
Posts: 38
Joined: 30.11.2002
Age: 39
With us: 21 years 11 months
Location: Germany

Post #28by FaLLeN_SOuL » 08.03.2007, 16:27

how do i install the files you provided in the zip?

ajtribick
Developer
Posts: 1855
Joined: 11.08.2003
With us: 21 years 3 months

Post #29by ajtribick » 08.03.2007, 16:45

That's pretty cool... looks like it could come in handy for modelling star systems containing dust rings, e.g. Beta Pictoris.

Avatar
Topic author
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Montreal

Post #30by Cham » 08.03.2007, 18:20

FaLLeN_SOuL wrote:how do i install the files you provided in the zip?


Just put the "test" folder in your "extra" directory. That's all. Select "Test 0" in Celestia then go.
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

Avatar
Topic author
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Montreal

Post #31by Cham » 08.03.2007, 19:17

El Christou had a great idea to use one of my ring models to reveal the asteroids belt in the solar system, without a mess of labels/orbits :

Image

The only problem, is the luminosity/opacity of the model at long range :

Image

We really need an option, in the SSC or in the CMOD file itself, to tell Celestia to add a decrease of luminosity or opacity over distance. Then all sorts of things would be made possible with this technique.
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

eburacum45
Posts: 691
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 21 years

Post #32by eburacum45 » 10.03.2007, 18:55

Wow! this is just what I want for the Bob-Jenkins-type Dyson swarm effect; thanks, Cham!

Image

buggs_moran
Posts: 835
Joined: 27.09.2004
With us: 20 years 2 months
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Post #33by buggs_moran » 11.03.2007, 03:23

This would also be really neat as an Oort cloud representation. Perhaps this and the asteroids could be something that could be turned on and off somehow? Maybe a toggle in the menu? Chris?


edit: as particles in a ring system as well
Homebrew:
WinXP Pro SP2
Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe
AMD Athlon XP 3000/333 2.16 GHz
1 GB Crucial RAM
80 GB WD SATA drive
ATI AIW 9600XT 128M

Avatar
Hungry4info
Posts: 1133
Joined: 11.09.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months
Location: Indiana, United States

Post #34by Hungry4info » 11.03.2007, 05:07

Wow, very nice indeed!
This paves the way for a debris disk add-on. I've been putting rings around model-less planets at the centres of stars to simulate disks for a while... but this is better by far. As the person before me said, ring systems would be a good idea too. The current saturn-rings.png could be used like a template, much like how galaxies are now with 1.5.0. From viewd afar, Saturn's rings would look "normal", but close up, you begin to see the individual dots. It would probably take quite a few, but still, this has obvious applications to ring systems.
Current Setup:
Windows 7 64 bit. Celestia 1.6.0.
AMD Athlon Processor, 1.6 Ghz, 3 Gb RAM
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics

chris
Site Admin
Posts: 4211
Joined: 28.01.2002
With us: 22 years 10 months
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA

Post #35by chris » 02.04.2007, 16:07

CMOD files now support point sprites, which should be ideal for this sort of work. There is a new primitive type sprites which can be used in conjunction with the new attribute pointsize. texture0 of the current material becomes the sprite image. Here is a very simple example cmod with three point sprites:

Code: Select all

#celmodel__ascii

material
diffuse 1 0 1
texture0 "flare.jpg"
end_material

mesh
vertexdesc
position f3
pointsize f1
end_vertexdesc

vertices 3
0 -1 -1 0.5
0 1 1 0.1
0 -1 1 0.1

sprites 0 3
0 1 2
end_mesh


When using sprites in a cmod, the pointsize attribute must be present in addition to the position. The units of pointsize are the same as for vertex positions.

--Chris

Avatar
Topic author
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Montreal

Post #36by Cham » 02.04.2007, 16:24

Now I'm extremellly excited ! Too bad I have to go to work right now ! :evil: :x :cry:

Please Chris, I also need an option to make the CMOD's luminosity (emissivity) variable with position, so the model can fade away with distance. Anybody (with or without OGL2) should be able to use that option (while sprites are usable with OGL2 only). That way, many new addons would be possible, of various types (with AND without sprites).
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

danielj
Posts: 1477
Joined: 15.08.2003
With us: 21 years 3 months

Re: New accretion disk method (WORK IN PROGRESS)

Post #37by danielj » 02.04.2007, 22:26

Everything is very nice,but WHICH computer will be able to handle SUCH COMPLEXITY?
I think we will need at least a dual core,2GB of RAM and a 512 MB video card like the Geforce 8 series.So I expect that will take at least 1 year to such things to become reality,because the only thing I can change in my computer until the half of 2008 is a LCD monitor and maybe another HD of maybe 400 GB.ONLY THIS!
Another thing that worries me is that Celestia is each time more DIY and almost NO complex addon had been launched in the last months.It??s a lame that we??ll have only the basic package and the rest will be YOUR PROBLEM.If you can??t understand Computer Programming Language,you will have NOTHING AT ALL...

[unnecessary message quote deleted ...s.]

rthorvald
Posts: 1223
Joined: 20.10.2003
With us: 21 years 1 month
Location: Norway

Re: New accretion disk method (WORK IN PROGRESS)

Post #38by rthorvald » 02.04.2007, 23:03

danielj wrote:Everything is very nice,but WHICH computer will be able to handle SUCH COMPLEXITY?
This is not something that will give your machine much trouble. In fact, it??s much more memory-efective than defining each point as a separate model (like the way stars or asteroids are done, and your machine can draw them just fine).

danielj wrote:Another thing that worries me is that Celestia is each time more DIY and almost NO complex addon had been launched in the last months.

Danielj, we have been here before. Complex addons are far between because they are a lot of work, so it takes a lot of time to create them. I have Add-Ons in the pipe i have worked on for years, for example. I know of others, too, just from reading the forums.

This isn??t a paid job. It??s just fun... And so it is done in people??s free time. If you are lucky, sometimes someone will actually publicize something you might like. Of course one can turn out tons of crap in a couple of hours, but you would not like that... So stop complaining and just be grateful when you find a gem.

- rthorvald
Image

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months
Location: NY, USA

Post #39by selden » 02.04.2007, 23:14

Daniel,

The point-sprite function, which is new to Celestia's CMOD model file, is not all that new in Celestia. It's the same thing that's used for drawing Celestia's galaxies, but now it is available for Addon creators to use. Point sprites also are used by most 3D computer games to do things like fog and smoke. I suspect you may have a few games like that already :)
Selden

ajtribick
Developer
Posts: 1855
Joined: 11.08.2003
With us: 21 years 3 months

Post #40by ajtribick » 02.04.2007, 23:18

You know, we could just produce material and develop so we cater to the most low-end system out there, but then Celestia would be something like this:

Code: Select all

You are in the Solar system at a distance of 1 AU from the Sun. You can see the Earth.

> TURN LEFT

You can see the Moon.

> GO FORWARD

You are next to the Moon. You can see the Mare Tranquillitatis.

> GO TO ALNITAK

You travel across the light years of space to Alnitak. You see an O-type supergiant star.


Return to “Add-on development”