Geosynchronous orbital drop duration and velocity

General physics and astronomy discussions not directly related to Celestia
Topic author
MKruer
Posts: 501
Joined: 18.09.2002
With us: 22 years 1 month

Geosynchronous orbital drop duration and velocity

Post #1by MKruer » 17.06.2006, 05:06

Can someone tell me if this is correct.

Geosynchronous orbit = 35,787,055m
Gravitational acceleration = 10m/s/s
2675s => 44.58m
26,750m/s @ Impact

Hamiltonian
Posts: 51
Joined: 27.10.2004
With us: 20 years

Post #2by Hamiltonian » 17.06.2006, 16:50

It's difficult to tell what you're doing. Are you calculating how long it will take to fall from geosynch orbit?
If so, you're forgetting that gravity is lower at geosynch height, so the initial acceleration will be lower than 10m/s/s.
The calc for the speed of impact just needs a conversion of the potential energy difference to kinetic. But for the time to fall, you have to integrate inverse velocity over distance.
Hamiltonian

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months

Post #3by Malenfant » 17.06.2006, 18:12

Is this through an atmosphere? If so, don't you need to account for terminal velocity?
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system

Hamiltonian
Posts: 51
Joined: 27.10.2004
With us: 20 years

Post #4by Hamiltonian » 17.06.2006, 18:37

Malenfant wrote:Is this through an atmosphere? If so, don't you need to account for terminal velocity?
35700 km of accleration outside the atmosphere first, so something falling from GEO will hit air at about 10km/s. Will terminal velocity have time to get relevant? Small things will burn, big things will hit the ground supersonicly.
Hamiltonian

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months

Post #5by Malenfant » 17.06.2006, 18:39

Hamiltonian wrote:
Malenfant wrote:Is this through an atmosphere? If so, don't you need to account for terminal velocity?
35700 km of accleration outside the atmosphere first, so something falling from GEO will hit air at about 10km/s. Will terminal velocity have time to get relevant? Small things will burn, big things will hit the ground supersonicly.


True :)
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system

Topic author
MKruer
Posts: 501
Joined: 18.09.2002
With us: 22 years 1 month

Post #6by MKruer » 17.06.2006, 19:16

Sorry about that everyone. I was tired when I posted that and wasn?€™t very clear. I was trying to calculate the speed of an object hitting the ground if it were dropped from geostationary orbit. I already see I screwed up by not talking into account that the gravitational acceleration is different at 32,000km so the duration and final impact speed will be substantially less.

For the time being let?€™s calculated with out any atmospheric resistance, it will make a difference but only very late in the fall. The atmospheric resistant can be calculated later.

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months
Location: NY, USA

Post #7by selden » 17.06.2006, 19:25

Remember, things don't "drop". They travel on an elliptical orbit. It's just that its perigee is below the surface of the Earth.
Selden

Topic author
MKruer
Posts: 501
Joined: 18.09.2002
With us: 22 years 1 month

Post #8by MKruer » 17.06.2006, 19:35

Ok then it has an elliptical orbit with and Eccentricity of 1 relative to the surface of the planet :lol:

its a hypothetical question.

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months
Location: NY, USA

Post #9by selden » 17.06.2006, 19:47

If you think of it as an orbit, though, it's easier to calculate the time it takes.
Selden

Hamiltonian
Posts: 51
Joined: 27.10.2004
With us: 20 years

Post #10by Hamiltonian » 17.06.2006, 23:02

The change in potential energy between GEO and Earth's surface gives a speed of 10.3 km/s.
Integrating the straight drop over the same distance comes out to 14,830s. (4.1 hours).

Arthur C Clarke wrote a story called Jupiter V where he talked about working out the time for a vertical drop from orbit. If you treat it like there's a point mass in the middle, the time to get all the way to the centre is always 1/(4.root(2)) times the circular orbital period.
Hamiltonian

tony873004
Posts: 132
Joined: 07.12.2003
With us: 20 years 11 months
Location: San Francisco http://www.gravitysimulator.com

Post #11by tony873004 » 19.06.2006, 06:18

This problem either requires calculus or an n-body simulation.

Using n-body with Gravity Simulator:

Ignoring atmosphere, it would take it 4 hours 7 minutes, 53 seconds to fall from geosychronous orbit, assuming that its orbital velocity was zero. It would be travelling 10.3 km/s as it hit the ground.

Hamiltonian
Posts: 51
Joined: 27.10.2004
With us: 20 years

Post #12by Hamiltonian » 19.06.2006, 09:31

tony873004 wrote:Ignoring atmosphere, it would take it 4 hours 7 minutes, 53 seconds to fall from geosychronous orbit, assuming that its orbital velocity was zero. It would be travelling 10.3 km/s as it hit the ground.
Checks my calculus nicely.
Thanks.
Hamiltonian

tony873004
Posts: 132
Joined: 07.12.2003
With us: 20 years 11 months
Location: San Francisco http://www.gravitysimulator.com

Post #13by tony873004 » 19.06.2006, 16:39

lol. I didn't even see your post when I posted my sim numbers. How do you integrate the drop?

Hamiltonian
Posts: 51
Joined: 27.10.2004
With us: 20 years

Post #14by Hamiltonian » 19.06.2006, 16:55

tony873004 wrote:lol. I didn't even see your post when I posted my sim numbers. How do you integrate the drop?

The velocity just comes from the change in potential energy. It is root(2GM(R-r)/(Rr)), if R and r are your start and finish distances.
Because time is distance over velocity, you must integrate the inverse of the velocity w.r.t. distance, between the limits R and r.
It comes down to solving the integral of root(x/(a-x)), which is too messy to write down here.
Hamiltonian


Return to “Physics and Astronomy”