White dots
White dots
Why do all objects beome white dots when you zoom out from them? When will this be corrected?
Just do what makes you happy provided you do not infringe on another's happiness for there is no point in living if you do not have happiness.
[tex]Happiness = \[\int_a^b \int_c^d \int_e^f \int_g^h U(x,y,z,t)\,dx dy dz dt\] = 42[/tex]
If only we knew U!
[tex]Happiness = \[\int_a^b \int_c^d \int_e^f \int_g^h U(x,y,z,t)\,dx dy dz dt\] = 42[/tex]
If only we knew U!
-
chris
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4211
- Joined: 28.01.2002
- With us: 22 years 8 months
- Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Re: White dots
chrisr wrote:Why do all objects beome white dots when you zoom out from them? When will this be corrected?
What would you expect to see instead?
--Chris
-
granthutchison
- Developer
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: 21.11.2002
- With us: 21 years 10 months
-
unloggedchrisr
fa
well i would expect it to disapear. Especially if the sun were behind it. If the sun is in the foreground this makes perfect sense. This brings up another idea. Will celestia ever incorporate contrast. Like not being able to see the other stars when the sun is in the field of view!
-
Slalomsk8er
- Posts: 128
- Joined: 26.07.2004
- With us: 20 years 2 months
- Location: Earth 7.593358long / 47.582393lat
- Contact:
Slalomsk8er wrote:And galaxies are even made briter by the flare of the suns!
That's an old problem.
I think it arises from a treatment of textures with an additive color concept instead of an subtractive one. There seems to be no division of textures into emissive and non emissive ones - so (overlay) textures on planet surfaces and deep space textures are treated the same way.
Of course it is ok in reality that a star adds it's light to a sun corona or nebula to make it brighter - unfortunately there are massive dynamic range restrictions on monitors that should turn this into negation for a proper display.
Perhaps Chris has this already on it's list ???
maxim
A billboard of a black disk with gradient edges could be placed or rendered behind the star model and the billboard of the flare to remove the galaxies and nebs out of the suns corona. Im willing to bet this would have to be a shadow map.
The other should be easy to fix with a bit of programming I suppose...
The other should be easy to fix with a bit of programming I suppose...
I'm trying to teach the cavemen how to play scrabble, its uphill work. The only word they know is Uhh and they dont know how to spell it!
(ive said this before, but) I think Celestia should calculate what the real world luminosity of each object & textures. Then adjust the output to the screen as make things visible, like a camera or the human eye would do.
As each object is rendered to the screen, the brightness values found could be analysed as to find an ideal exposure value, this can then be used to as to adjust the next rendered screen. The eye can take a number of seconds to find the ideal exposure settings, so getting to the ideal value doesn’t have to be instant.
(for those who don’t understand what I mean, found some details on luminosity histograms here: http://www.megapixel.net/cgi-bin/fs_loa ... ogram.html)
As each object is rendered to the screen, the brightness values found could be analysed as to find an ideal exposure value, this can then be used to as to adjust the next rendered screen. The eye can take a number of seconds to find the ideal exposure settings, so getting to the ideal value doesn’t have to be instant.
(for those who don’t understand what I mean, found some details on luminosity histograms here: http://www.megapixel.net/cgi-bin/fs_loa ... ogram.html)