t00fri wrote:-- Unlike Chris;-) and being 'born' as a UNIX person;-), I am NEVER too lazy to change directory or file names on the fly ( < 1 sec work)...The crucial point is that I usually enjoy to experiment with different ideas/possibilities for improvement, while implementing e.g. an Add-On.
I personaly don't learn anything from making file names match their ssc references. I only see this as a very frustrating way to waste my time.
There is nothing meaningful or valuable in this 'activity' of correcting typos.
t00fri wrote:-- computerized, interfaces have the disadvantage for me that they impose standardizations that tend to make me stop thinking about improvements!
One click...and AAAAh it works!
Becareful here, Amazon have a pattent on that one!
I understand your argument, and I certainly don't want to restrict your or anyone else's creativity by imposing 'artificial' constraints. That's why interested parties - add-on creators, developers, and users - have been invited to take part in the preliminary specification phase. So let yourself be heard!
t00fri wrote:Few examples from the past:
--The 'standardization' of tiles to 512x512 has been strongly advocated. Meanwhile I and others found out that this is often far from optimal! Analogous comments apply to the 'standardization' of texture & normalmap formats...
The main standardization the repository will bring is the manifest file, which does not even exist yet. It will make easier to track changes in add-ons, and will hopefuly help clarify legal issues regarding authorship and licences.
The other important standardization is the package format (zip) and the directory structure. I don't see how this could be a limitation for the add-on creator, but if you have examples now is the time to expose them.
t00fri wrote:The mere existence of a 'standardizing' Repository will clearly induce prejudices among the contributors for using certain format/size standards from the start! No further questioning anymore...
Well, other than zip, there is no format forced on the creator.
t00fri wrote:--Some tile textures I might want to install as Alternative Texture, others with my own personal directory structure/hierarchy. Standardizing Repositories would not save work for me but rather increase it, in a fair number of cases at least;-)
I really don't see how. You could use extras/t00fri for your personal directory structure, and as long as nobody releases a t00fri add-on you're safe!
t00fri wrote:-- after using the Repository for a while, I would start forgetting how everything really works.
I hate this!;-)
You know, the repository will not be some magical wand making add-ons for you! You just won't
have to tweak them to make them work, but you'll still be allowed to tweak them for your own pleasure.
t00fri wrote:Now you can jump on me again, repeat the arguments what a useful service a repository is for those "who just like to watch the show" etc. I know, I know...;-)
I really hope the repository will be benificial to everyone, including you. Taking part in the design process is the only way for you to make sure of that.