Big Bang A Bust

[jmitchell]

Throughout history the scientific community; though having done much good, has made erroneous assumptions that appear ridiculous today. The two biggest would be the flat earth theory, and the belief that the earth is at the center of the universe. Alongside of these, and even surpassing them is the belief in the big bang.
There was no Big Bang. The universe as we know it is not expanding or contracting, but relative constant. What is happening is that: like satellites around planets, and planets around stars and stars circling in their galaxy; the galaxies themselves are orbiting around. This is the “Galaxy Spin Theory”.
The Big Bang theory is based on three premises. (1)There is cosmic background radiation (2) most of the galaxies are going away from each other (their light being red shifted) (3) and there is an abundance of lighter materials.
After trillions of years of stars being born, stars dying, quasars, and all the other energy production it would be surprising if there weren’t cosmic background radiation. It does not prove in any way that there was a big bang.
Most galaxies do appear to be receding from each other, but not because there was a big explosion. Each galaxy has its own orbit: those on an inside orbit are going faster than us, so there light is red shifted, and those on the outside orbits are going slower than us and so their light is red shifted. The galaxies are not traveling out to beyond infinity.
That there is an abundance of lighter materials is only logical, and proves nothing. It would be like saying the fact that there are more lighter rocks on earth than heavier rocks proves a theory.
The Big Bang theory relies heavily on dark matter and dark energy. If no dark matter how is the light of distant galaxies being shifted? If no dark energy, why are the galaxies accelerating? The Galaxy Spin Theory unlike the Big Bang Theory does not rely on dark matter and dark energy. The light of distant galaxies is shifted because they are actually turning in their respective orbits. The Galaxies are not actually accelerating but only appear to be in relation to our own galaxy. This can be illustrated by two cars on the freeway going the same speed. Because they are going the same speed there appears to be no acceleration in relation to each other. However if one car takes the off ramp; even though he is moving at the same speed as before, it appears to the other car now to be accelerating. All galaxies in their respective orbits are on their own off ramp, seeming to each other to be accelerating even though they are going there normal orbital speed.
The big bang theory can be debunked by the simple formula A+B=C. Where A is dark matter and B is dark and C is the big bang. There is not near enough detected dark matter to account for observations and there is absolutely zero detected dark energy. No A. No B. No C.
I call the galaxy spin entity a Whirly (you have to call it something.) I call ours the S.R.T.E. Whirly. Are there other Whirlies out there? Logically so.
Any response to this would be welcome at galaxyspin@yahoo.com, and I have a brief presentation of my theory under big bang a bust" on YouTube.

Copyright 2007 Jeffrey P.Mitchell

[ElChristou]

I think this is for Fridger!

[BobHegwood]

And references please?
Why should we believe some brand-new user who suddenly announces that everything we know about the Universe, and has been proven by a wide variety of
scientists (those people who are most assuredly smarter than myself) is now totally false?

Again, scientific papers to back this up? Other scientists who concur with your assessment?

Thanks, Brain-Dead

[ajtribick]

I am working on a pseudoscientific theory on the periodicity of pseudoscience appearing on these forums, however I would have to release it at the appropriate point in the pseudoscience cycle so as not to disprove my own theory.

[selden]

This is not an appropriate forum for discussing non-mainstream theories. Please take it to http://www.bautforum.com/against-mainstream/

I'm locking this thread.