V1.3.2pre7 secrets

General discussion about Celestia that doesn't fit into other forums.
Topic author
maxim
Posts: 1036
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 20 years 7 months
Location: N?rnberg, Germany

V1.3.2pre7 secrets

Post #1by maxim » 17.03.2004, 19:38

I'm running pre7 now and everything works well so far with my numerous addons. I haven'd switched on all of them yet, but I'm slighly optimistic Image

But watching the solsystem from above and having switched on planet orbits and sampling rate set to 500, I wonder what this is? Image

The new sign for intergalactic peace? Image

Image

maxim :)

Avatar
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 3 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: V1.3.2pre7 secrets

Post #2by t00fri » 17.03.2004, 20:31

maxim wrote:I'm running pre7 now and everything works well so far with my numerous addons. I haven'd switched on all of them yet, but I'm slighly optimistic Image

But watching the solsystem from above and having switched on planet orbits and sampling rate set to 500, I wonder what this is? Image

The new sign for intergalactic peace? Image

Image

maxim :)


could you quote the cel:url, please...

Bye Fridger

jim
Posts: 378
Joined: 14.01.2003
With us: 21 years 5 months
Location: Germany

Post #3by jim » 17.03.2004, 21:49

As far as I know had Kendrix the same problems with an early version of KCelestia.

I can really not untersand why we must invent the weel again. Is it such a big problem to ask Kendrix for it's code. Celestia1.3.2pre7 is still far away from KCelestias smooth orbits and rings. :roll: :?:

Bye Jens

chris
Site Admin
Posts: 4211
Joined: 28.01.2002
With us: 22 years 5 months
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA

Post #4by chris » 17.03.2004, 22:08

jim wrote:As far as I know had Kendrix the same problems with an early version of KCelestia.

I can really not untersand why we must invent the weel again. Is it such a big problem to ask Kendrix for it's code. Celestia1.3.2pre7 is still far away from KCelestias smooth orbits and rings. :roll: :?:


Aside from extra orbit lines (sorry about that), it looks exactly the same to me . . . I can't see what he would have been doing differently.

--Chris

Topic author
maxim
Posts: 1036
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 20 years 7 months
Location: N?rnberg, Germany

Post #5by maxim » 17.03.2004, 23:16

Fridger,

A similar cel://URL is:

cel://Follow/Sol/2004-03-17T23:09:01.69 ... =6051&lm=0

In celestia.cfg I've set these parameters:

OrbitPathSamplePoints 500
RingSystemSections 500


Unlike the picture may indicate, the knot-points don't reflect the positions of the planets. All in all, such a view could be nice as a kind of graticule. Having the central dividing line for comparision, it'll show well how the orbits are twisted against each other, and how things slow down from inner to outer orbits - at least more picturing than watching some small white dots move.

maxim :)

TERRIER
Posts: 717
Joined: 29.04.2003
With us: 21 years 2 months
Location: West Yorkshire, England

Post #6by TERRIER » 17.03.2004, 23:21

jim wrote: Is it such a big problem to ask Kendrix for it's code. Celestia1.3.2pre7 is still far away from KCelestias smooth orbits and rings. :roll: :?:

Bye Jens


Jens

Are the rings of Saturn in 1.3.2pre7 not comparable with Kcelestia, using a RingSystemSections setting in the new .cfg file of 1000 (or greater 8O ) ?
They look pretty smooth to me. 8)

regards
TERRIER
1.6.0:AMDAth1.2GHz 1GbDDR266:Ge6200 256mbDDR250:WinXP-SP3:1280x1024x32FS:v196.21@AA4x:AF16x:IS=HQ:T.Buff=ON Earth16Kdds@15KkmArctic2000AD:FOV1:SPEC L5dds:NORM L5dxt5:CLOUD L5dds:
NIGHT L5dds:MOON L4dds:GALXY ON:MAG 15.2-SAP:TIME 1000x:RP=OGL2:10.3FPS

Topic author
maxim
Posts: 1036
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 20 years 7 months
Location: N?rnberg, Germany

Post #7by maxim » 18.03.2004, 12:25

I've discovered that all my specs are gone with pre7. No way to get them back. The spec images load, but don't display.
Furthermore I now have only three renderpaths left (basic,multitexture and nvidia combiners) instead of five with 1.3.1 - but my card is still a MX4.

maxim :?:

Darkmiss
Posts: 1059
Joined: 20.08.2002
With us: 21 years 10 months
Location: London, England

Post #8by Darkmiss » 18.03.2004, 15:57

TERRIER wrote:Are the rings of Saturn in 1.3.2pre7 not comparable with Kcelestia, using a RingSystemSections setting in the new .cfg file of 1000 (or greater 8O ) ?
They look pretty smooth to me. 8)

regards
TERRIER


Terrier could you explain a bit more about this setting and how to use it. :?:
CPU- Intel Pentium Core 2 Quad ,2.40GHz
RAM- 2Gb 1066MHz DDR2
Motherboard- Gigabyte P35 DQ6
Video Card- Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS + 640Mb
Hard Drives- 2 SATA Raptor 10000rpm 150GB
OS- Windows Vista Home Premium 32

Darkmiss
Posts: 1059
Joined: 20.08.2002
With us: 21 years 10 months
Location: London, England

Post #9by Darkmiss » 18.03.2004, 16:01

maxim wrote:I've discovered that all my specs are gone with pre7. No way to get them back. The spec images load, but don't display.
Furthermore I now have only three renderpaths left (basic,multitexture and nvidia combiners) instead of five with 1.3.1 - but my card is still a MX4.

maxim :?:


Maxim did you just download the exe only or the full install ?

there are new shaders with the latest two pre-releases. (6/7)
did you copy these across if you downloaded the full install?
CPU- Intel Pentium Core 2 Quad ,2.40GHz

RAM- 2Gb 1066MHz DDR2

Motherboard- Gigabyte P35 DQ6

Video Card- Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS + 640Mb

Hard Drives- 2 SATA Raptor 10000rpm 150GB

OS- Windows Vista Home Premium 32

TERRIER
Posts: 717
Joined: 29.04.2003
With us: 21 years 2 months
Location: West Yorkshire, England

Post #10by TERRIER » 18.03.2004, 22:02

Paul

No prob, first open up (with notepad or similar text editor) your new celestia.cfg file that is found in Celestia 1.3.2pre7 main directory . (Also it's probably best to make a copy of the original before you start altering it, and put it in a safe place, just in case of a mistake) Then look for the following section;

Code: Select all

The following lines are all rendering detail settings.  Assigning
# higher values will give better quality images, but may cause some
# slowdowns on older system.
#------------------------------------------------------------------------
  OrbitPathSamplePoints  100
  RingSystemSections     100

# These values should both be powers of two; using larger values will
# reduce the jagged edges of eclipse shadows and shadows on planet
# rings, but it will decrease the amount of memory available for
# planet textures.  The maximum useful setting is 2048 for the shadow
# texture and 1024 for eclipse textures.
  ShadowTextureSize      256
  EclipseTextureSize     128



and adjust the settings to suit;

These are mine;


Code: Select all

The following lines are all rendering detail settings.  Assigning
# higher values will give better quality images, but may cause some
# slowdowns on older system.
#------------------------------------------------------------------------
  OrbitPathSamplePoints  800
  RingSystemSections     1000

# These values should both be powers of two; using larger values will
# reduce the jagged edges of eclipse shadows and shadows on planet
# rings, but it will decrease the amount of memory available for
# planet textures.  The maximum useful setting is 2048 for the shadow
# texture and 1024 for eclipse textures.
  ShadowTextureSize      2048
  EclipseTextureSize     1024



You probably don't need the ring settings at 1000, but at this setting they don't seem to cause me much slowdown. :D

regards
TERRIER
1.6.0:AMDAth1.2GHz 1GbDDR266:Ge6200 256mbDDR250:WinXP-SP3:1280x1024x32FS:v196.21@AA4x:AF16x:IS=HQ:T.Buff=ON Earth16Kdds@15KkmArctic2000AD:FOV1:SPEC L5dds:NORM L5dxt5:CLOUD L5dds:
NIGHT L5dds:MOON L4dds:GALXY ON:MAG 15.2-SAP:TIME 1000x:RP=OGL2:10.3FPS

Topic author
maxim
Posts: 1036
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 20 years 7 months
Location: N?rnberg, Germany

Post #11by maxim » 18.03.2004, 22:58

Darkmiss wrote:Maxim did you just download the exe only or the full install ?

there are new shaders with the latest two pre-releases. (6/7)
did you copy these across if you downloaded the full install?


I have the full install, and the new shaders. But there are only four ones (for ring shadows, eclipses and multishadows) - nothing new for reflections.

maxim

Topic author
maxim
Posts: 1036
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 20 years 7 months
Location: N?rnberg, Germany

Post #12by maxim » 19.03.2004, 19:03

Is the loss of specularity commonly verified, or is this only a problem I have?

maxim :?:

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10190
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 21 years 9 months
Location: NY, USA

Post #13by selden » 19.03.2004, 19:31

When using Celestia v1.3.2pre7, 1.3.0 final and 1.3.1 final,
I see specularity on the Earth when using an FX5200 card.
It shows up only in the OpenGL vertex program and higher rendering paths.
It does not show up when using the Basic, Multitexture or Nvidia combiners rendering paths.

Have you tested your card with v1.3.1 final to make sure vertex programs are available with that version?
Selden

Topic author
maxim
Posts: 1036
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 20 years 7 months
Location: N?rnberg, Germany

Post #14by maxim » 19.03.2004, 19:55

I used 1.3.1final before, and I had two more rendering paths: 'OpenGL vertex program' and 'Nvidia combiners/OpenGL vertex program'.
These two I don't have anymore now, still using my MX card.

maxim :?

chris
Site Admin
Posts: 4211
Joined: 28.01.2002
With us: 22 years 5 months
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA

Post #15by chris » 19.03.2004, 20:12

I know what the problem is, and it will be fixed for the next prerelease. The multishadow_arb.vp shader uses more texture coordinates than your graphics card supports, so it fails to load. Try copying one of the ARB vertex shaders (any one of the files ending in _arb.vp) over it.

--Chris

Topic author
maxim
Posts: 1036
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 20 years 7 months
Location: N?rnberg, Germany

Post #16by maxim » 19.03.2004, 20:17

I,ll gonna do that, Chris. Thank you for the hint.

maxim :)


Return to “Celestia Users”