Celestia 1.2.5pre7: too restrictive date field
-
Topic authorselden
- Developer
- Posts: 10192
- Joined: 04.09.2002
- With us: 22 years 2 months
- Location: NY, USA
Celestia 1.2.5pre7: too restrictive date field
Whenever I try to type in a year that's far away from the current year, Celestia's "Set Time" window "fixes" it and picks a recent year.
For example, whenever I try to type in 12 Sep 1170, Celestia changes it to 12 Sep 2002.
While one can turn up the backward rate of time passage to get to the desired date, this is rather frustrating.
For example, whenever I try to type in 12 Sep 1170, Celestia changes it to 12 Sep 2002.
While one can turn up the backward rate of time passage to get to the desired date, this is rather frustrating.
Selden
-
- Developer
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: 21.11.2002
- With us: 22 years
-
- Developer
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: 21.11.2002
- With us: 22 years
-
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: 16.12.2002
- With us: 21 years 11 months
- Location: People's Republic Of Cork, Ireland
You have to change each field seperately it doesnt seem to let you change more than one at the same time... (In other words) go into clock, change the hour, click ok, go into clock, change the minute, click ok, go into clock, change the second, click ok.
I can change the date all in one go though that seems to work ok!
I can change the date all in one go though that seems to work ok!
-
- Developer
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: 21.11.2002
- With us: 22 years
Thanks, that works. But, sheesh, it's a user-beligerent interface as it stands.JackHiggins wrote:... go into clock, change the hour, click ok, go into clock, change the minute, click ok, go into clock, change the second, click ok.
I do have exactly the same problem as Selden describes with date entry, though - as soon as I type the last digit of, say, 1150, Celestia flips me back to the current year.
Grant
-
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: 16.12.2002
- With us: 21 years 11 months
- Location: People's Republic Of Cork, Ireland
Um... yeah i probably should have added that its really annoying and takes ages!!! I'm used to this kind of hassle with my computer though so having to do things the long way round a couple of times over doesnt bother me much really!!!
I spose you could reverse time and run it back really fast, until you get to the correct year, then specify the date without changing the year...? would that work i havent tried it?
I spose you could reverse time and run it back really fast, until you get to the correct year, then specify the date without changing the year...? would that work i havent tried it?
-
- Developer
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: 21.11.2002
- With us: 22 years
-
- Posts: 986
- Joined: 16.08.2002
- With us: 22 years 3 months
- Location: USA, East Coast
-
- Developer
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: 21.11.2002
- With us: 22 years
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4211
- Joined: 28.01.2002
- With us: 22 years 9 months
- Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
billybob884 wrote:I've also noticed that the earliest date it will let you go to by clickingthe date and changing it with the arrows is 14 sep 1752
It seems to be a limitation with the Windows time/date control. Thanks Microsoft. I certainly didn't code this behavior and find it rather onerous myself. I'll see if there are some settings that I can use to get around the earliest date restriction.
--Chris
-
- Developer
- Posts: 944
- Joined: 18.07.2002
- With us: 22 years 4 months
- Location: Lyon (France)
chris wrote:It seems to be a limitation with the Windows time/date control. Thanks Microsoft. I certainly didn't code this behavior and find it rather onerous myself. I'll see if there are some settings that I can use to get around the earliest date restriction.
There's the same limitation with KDE's date picker widget, it's even more restrictive (not allowing dates before the 20th century). That's why I replaced that widget by spinboxes, it's not as nice looking, you can't see the week day or week number but there's no limitation, at least not beyond those of astro::Date.
Besides you can't really blame Microsoft for not supporting dates that never existed!
--
Christophe
-
- Developer
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: 21.11.2002
- With us: 22 years
-
- Posts: 986
- Joined: 16.08.2002
- With us: 22 years 3 months
- Location: USA, East Coast
chris wrote:It seems to be a limitation with the Windows time/date control. Thanks Microsoft. I certainly didn't code this behavior and find it rather onerous myself. I'll see if there are some settings that I can use to get around the earliest date restriction.billybob884 wrote:I've also noticed that the earliest date it will let you go to by clickingthe date and changing it with the arrows is 14 sep 1752
--Chris
thats why i dont let microsoft get me down