German users: Petition against light pollution in Germany

The only place for all Non Celestia Discussion/Stuff
Avatar
Topic author
Adirondack M
Posts: 528
Joined: 01.03.2004
With us: 20 years 10 months

German users: Petition against light pollution in Germany

Post #1by Adirondack » 23.11.2007, 12:27

http://itc.napier.ac.uk/e-Petition/bundestag/view_petition.asp?PetitionID=565 <- German speaking page of the Bundestag

Adirondack
We all live under the same sky, but we do not have the same horizon. (K. Adenauer)
The horizon of some people is a circle with the radius zero - and they call it their point of view. (A. Einstein)

Andy74 M
Posts: 114
Joined: 21.07.2004
Age: 50
With us: 20 years 6 months
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Post #2by Andy74 » 23.11.2007, 22:08

Signed.
:)

BobHegwood
Posts: 1803
Joined: 12.10.2007
With us: 17 years 3 months

Post #3by BobHegwood » 24.11.2007, 15:01

Ulrich,

Could you enlighten us poor non-German-speaking slobs as to what
all the fuss is about?

I realize that I could use Babelfish to translate the page, but I'm a
lazy frell so I just thought maybe you could - again - "Enlighten" us
poor English speaking slobs. :wink:

Thanks, Brain-Dead
Brain-Dead Geezer Bob is now using...
Windows Vista Home Premium, 64-bit on a
Gateway Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5200, 2.5GHz
7 GB RAM, 500 GB hard disk, Nvidia GeForce 7100
Nvidia nForce 630i, 1680x1050 screen, Latest SVN

Avatar
LordFerret M
Posts: 737
Joined: 24.08.2006
Age: 68
With us: 18 years 5 months
Location: NJ USA

Post #4by LordFerret » 24.11.2007, 22:20

LIGHTS OUT! :wink:

Avatar
Hungry4info
Posts: 1133
Joined: 11.09.2005
With us: 19 years 4 months
Location: Indiana, United States

Post #5by Hungry4info » 25.11.2007, 06:26

I signed it. I don't know how much the opinion of an American counts, but still.
Current Setup:
Windows 7 64 bit. Celestia 1.6.0.
AMD Athlon Processor, 1.6 Ghz, 3 Gb RAM
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics

Avatar
Topic author
Adirondack M
Posts: 528
Joined: 01.03.2004
With us: 20 years 10 months

Post #6by Adirondack » 25.11.2007, 14:17

BobHegwood wrote:Could you enlighten us poor non-German-speaking slobs as to what all the fuss is about?
Bob,

with the petition, a law should be created to the protection of the environment and the climate-protection against light-contamination.

Reason:
More and more bright light, emitted by streetlighting, buildings, light-advertisement and intense focused headlights (Sky-Beamer) e.g. by discotheques or other facilities is contaminating the night sky. There must also be a corresponding law in Germany.

The light-smog should be reduced so that there is a better gaze for the firmament again just as the environment, especially birds and night-active animals become protected. Among other things, this law should still save energy also as climate-precaution. Slovenia has (as chief EC country) decided such a law against the light-contamination on August 30, 2007. Also the Bundestag might decide, that such a law is created in Germany.

Adirondack
We all live under the same sky, but we do not have the same horizon. (K. Adenauer)

The horizon of some people is a circle with the radius zero - and they call it their point of view. (A. Einstein)

BobHegwood
Posts: 1803
Joined: 12.10.2007
With us: 17 years 3 months

Post #7by BobHegwood » 25.11.2007, 18:32

Hey, thanks very much for the explanation. If any country in the
world does this though, it's got to be the good old USA...

As far as I know there are NO plans for such protection here , or even
the mention of such a thing. Since we consume more of the world's
resources than anyone else, you'd think that such an idea might be
a priority here too wouldn't you?

Thanks, energy-spoiled, Brain-Dead Bob
Brain-Dead Geezer Bob is now using...
Windows Vista Home Premium, 64-bit on a
Gateway Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5200, 2.5GHz
7 GB RAM, 500 GB hard disk, Nvidia GeForce 7100
Nvidia nForce 630i, 1680x1050 screen, Latest SVN

Avatar
LordFerret M
Posts: 737
Joined: 24.08.2006
Age: 68
With us: 18 years 5 months
Location: NJ USA

Post #8by LordFerret » 26.11.2007, 09:01

The problem here though, as per the statistics, is that when the lights go out (streetlights) the crime goes up. :?

Lights out in Las Vegas? 8O New York City?? 8O :lol:

Avatar
Topic author
Adirondack M
Posts: 528
Joined: 01.03.2004
With us: 20 years 10 months

Post #9by Adirondack » 26.11.2007, 11:56

LordFerret wrote:The problem here though, as per the statistics, is that when the lights go out (streetlights) the crime goes up. :?

Dear Lord, :wink:

this acceptance is evidently wrong!
Try shooting somebody in the dark or on a bright street...
BTW: We are not talking about switching off the streetlights
but using better lamps which do not radiate into the sky.


Adirondack
We all live under the same sky, but we do not have the same horizon. (K. Adenauer)

The horizon of some people is a circle with the radius zero - and they call it their point of view. (A. Einstein)

Avatar
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 10 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #10by t00fri » 26.11.2007, 12:44

LordFerret wrote:The problem here though, as per the statistics, is that when the lights go out (streetlights) the crime goes up. :?

Lights out in Las Vegas? 8O New York City?? 8O :lol:


There have been repeatedly identical campaigns in the US over the last 20 years, as I remember well from corresponding reports in Sky&Telescope.

Result: nil...

Probably, a much higher probablility for success would be associated with pleas for monochromatic streetlights, as one finds in many vapor lamps (emission is dominated by a single spectral line, e.g. Na, Hg vapor) . I guess the yellow-orange Na vapor street lights have been quite popular in the US for many years.

--------------------------------------------
Such monochromatic light can be VERY efficiently filtered out at the telescope's eyepiece as every (amateur) astronomer knows VERY well. The corresponding filters cost only a moderate amount (~40$ depending on their diameter)
--------------------------------------------

Bye Fridger
Image

Avatar
Hungry4info
Posts: 1133
Joined: 11.09.2005
With us: 19 years 4 months
Location: Indiana, United States

Post #11by Hungry4info » 26.11.2007, 14:47

t00fri wrote:Such monochromatic light can be VERY efficiently filtered out at the telescope's eyepiece as every (amateur) astronomer knows VERY well.


No, I'm afraid I didn't know that. Haha what's below amateur?
Current Setup:
Windows 7 64 bit. Celestia 1.6.0.
AMD Athlon Processor, 1.6 Ghz, 3 Gb RAM
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics

Avatar
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 10 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #12by t00fri » 26.11.2007, 16:43

Hungry4info wrote:
t00fri wrote:Such monochromatic light can be VERY efficiently filtered out at the telescope's eyepiece as every (amateur) astronomer knows VERY well.

No, I'm afraid I didn't know that. Haha what's below amateur?


Well...if you are not practicing astronomy ...

Anyhow, these filters are high-performance, dielectric, narrow-band filters great for VISUAL observation of all nebulae types and for all instrument sizes (mounted at the eyepiece). They are designed to almost completely block the standard emission lines of vapor lights etc.

See e.g.
http://televue.com/engine/page.asp?ID=216

Bye Fridger
Last edited by t00fri on 26.11.2007, 18:13, edited 2 times in total.
Image

Avatar
Fenerit M
Posts: 1880
Joined: 26.03.2007
Age: 17
With us: 17 years 10 months
Location: Thyrrenian sea

Post #13by Fenerit » 26.11.2007, 16:51

Adirondack wrote:
LordFerret wrote:The problem here though, as per the statistics, is that when the lights go out (streetlights) the crime goes up. :?
Dear Lord, :wink:

this acceptance is evidently wrong!
Try shooting somebody in the dark or on a bright street...
BTW: We are not talking about switching off the streetlights
but using better lamps which do not radiate into the sky.


Adirondack


I agree with Adirondack even for another question: in the dark could be there a crime against the criminal...
Never at rest.
Massimo

Avatar
LordFerret M
Posts: 737
Joined: 24.08.2006
Age: 68
With us: 18 years 5 months
Location: NJ USA

Post #14by LordFerret » 27.11.2007, 18:41

Ummm... first..... I much prefer "Ferret" to "Lord"..... it is what all my friends refer to me by. :wink: :D

I'm not exactly familiar with the lighting technology that Adirondack and Fridger refer to, though I am aware there are these days more economical alternatives that exist. I think however the issue with using these more efficient and environment friendly alternatives, still boils down to cost... cost of installation due to the labor involved. That, I find highly likely in what Fridger mentions in the failure of the petitions of change he notes...
There have been repeatedly identical campaigns in the US over the last 20 years, as I remember well from corresponding reports in Sky&Telescope.

Result: nil...

The phasing-out of old lighting technologies could be an option, or so you would think... but I've seen many an occasion even in the town where I live, where new lights were installed to replace burnt-out lights, and the difference in color and illumination level had residents complaining - enough to where old-style bulbs were again put in as replacement. :?


Return to “Petit Bistro Entropy”