Orbits and Labels colors
-
Topic authorCham
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: 14.01.2004
- Age: 60
- With us: 20 years 10 months
- Location: Montreal
Let me try your color again. I just want to be sure there is no color conflict with anything else...
Give me few min.
And what about the suggestion about the selected label in vivid red (like the marker) ?
Give me few min.
And what about the suggestion about the selected label in vivid red (like the marker) ?
Last edited by Cham on 17.06.2007, 20:50, edited 1 time in total.
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"
-
- Developer
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: 04.02.2005
- With us: 19 years 9 months
-
Topic authorCham
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: 14.01.2004
- Age: 60
- With us: 20 years 10 months
- Location: Montreal
Fridger,
use that color :
It's almost the same as yours (rounded and less blue, which was giving the "dead" impression). Just a bit less "dead" (the difference is very subtle).
use that color :
Code: Select all
Color(0.42f, 0.57f, 0.49f)
It's almost the same as yours (rounded and less blue, which was giving the "dead" impression). Just a bit less "dead" (the difference is very subtle).
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"
- t00fri
- Developer
- Posts: 8772
- Joined: 29.03.2002
- Age: 22
- With us: 22 years 7 months
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
Cham wrote:Fridger,
use that color :Code: Select all
Color(0.42f, 0.57f, 0.49f)
It's almost the same as yours (rounded and less blue, which was giving the "dead" impression). Just a bit less "dead" (the difference is very subtle).
Yes, I can very well live with this. It nicely fits to the brick red, really.
Only it's visibility is not THAT good over the MW. But that's life. Perhaps Christophe will find another shade, once he's sober again (hi hi)
Bye Fridger
-
Topic authorCham
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: 14.01.2004
- Age: 60
- With us: 20 years 10 months
- Location: Montreal
t00fri wrote:Only it's visibility is not THAT good over the MW.
On the contrary, I think it's perfect now.
What about the suggestion of the selected label in red ? Do you think this is easy to do ?
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"
-
Topic authorCham
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: 14.01.2004
- Age: 60
- With us: 20 years 10 months
- Location: Montreal
t00fri wrote:Cham,
I just noticed that with your soft step fading, the red labels for the Orion add-on do not fade anymore for large FoV...
There's something strange happening with the Orion addon. I don't think it's related to the fading (I may be wrong). While I rotate around it, the nebula model is "blinking" ! It's the only nebula addon which is behaving like this. Strange.
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"
- t00fri
- Developer
- Posts: 8772
- Joined: 29.03.2002
- Age: 22
- With us: 22 years 7 months
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
Cham wrote:t00fri wrote:Cham,
I just noticed that with your soft step fading, the red labels for the Orion add-on do not fade anymore for large FoV...
There's something strange happening with the Orion addon. I don't think it's related to the fading (I may be wrong). While I rotate around it, the nebula model is "blinking" ! It's the only nebula addon which is behaving like this. Strange.
Havn't noticed that effect.
Actually, I went back to 4.0f -> 6.0f in the 'distr' definition and actually like the old fading step better (with the new colors). It's more powerful and the global view looks more intersting despite some label overlap initially. I also like 6.0f better for galaxies.
I could easily only code the clusters with 4.0f while all others use 6.0f. No problem.
Let's see what Christophe thinks.
Bye Fridger
-
Topic authorCham
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: 14.01.2004
- Age: 60
- With us: 20 years 10 months
- Location: Montreal
There's definitely something wrong with the Orion model. I don't know what it is, but all my other nebulas addons are working great. I'll have to take a look to the mesh and its texture mapping.
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"
-
Topic authorCham
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: 14.01.2004
- Age: 60
- With us: 20 years 10 months
- Location: Montreal
t00fri wrote:I could easily only code the clusters with 4.0f while all others use 6.0f. No problem.
Ok, it may be a good idea to add a few lines to separate the galaxies from the rest.
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"
-
Topic authorCham
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: 14.01.2004
- Age: 60
- With us: 20 years 10 months
- Location: Montreal
I just discovered an anomaly, in the Orion model. Some unused textures are declared in the model, and the addon doesn't use all the textures in the medres folder. Some meshes in the models folder aren't used. This addon has some structural problems.
Fridger,
what Orion addon are you using ?
Fridger,
what Orion addon are you using ?
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"
- t00fri
- Developer
- Posts: 8772
- Joined: 29.03.2002
- Age: 22
- With us: 22 years 7 months
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
Cham wrote:I just discovered an anomaly, in the Orion model. Some unused textures are declared in the model, and the addon doesn't use all the textures in the medres folder. Some meshes in the models folder aren't used. This addon has some structural problems.
Fridger,
what Orion addon are you using ?
M42,M43,NGC 1977 by Praesepe. It's in Messier nebulae on ML.
Bye Fridger
-
Topic authorCham
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: 14.01.2004
- Age: 60
- With us: 20 years 10 months
- Location: Montreal
t00fri wrote:M42,M43,NGC 1977 by Praesepe. It's in Messier nebulae on ML.
I'm using the same. Apparently, the models has some kind of problems I'm unable to identify. For example, see in its medres folder. There are three textures there. Two aren't declared in the meshes. And the meshes are including several unused materials without any textures.
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"
- t00fri
- Developer
- Posts: 8772
- Joined: 29.03.2002
- Age: 22
- With us: 22 years 7 months
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
Here is the modified render.cpp, with step =6.0f for nebulae and galaxies, while step = 4.0f for clusters.
http://www.celestiaproject.net/~t00fri/images/render.cpp.zip
Bye Fridger
http://www.celestiaproject.net/~t00fri/images/render.cpp.zip
Bye Fridger
- t00fri
- Developer
- Posts: 8772
- Joined: 29.03.2002
- Age: 22
- With us: 22 years 7 months
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
Cham wrote:I just discovered an anomaly, in the Orion model. Some unused textures are declared in the model, and the addon doesn't use all the textures in the medres folder. Some meshes in the models folder aren't used. This addon has some structural problems.
Fridger,
what Orion addon are you using ?
I debugged the add-on. It's true that M42-B.png and M42-C.png are unused. Only m42.png is used. Moreover, I added Mesh "M42-43.3ds" also in M43. Then I went carefully around the nebulae. Everything looks perfect. No anomalies whatsoever.
Bye Fridger
-
Topic authorCham
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: 14.01.2004
- Age: 60
- With us: 20 years 10 months
- Location: Montreal
Fridger,
your last render.cpp is working. However, I just noticed a glitch with the MW rendering : while the Sun is selected, moving around the MW makes its luminosity jump suddenly. I don't think I had this effect with the previous render.cpp.
your last render.cpp is working. However, I just noticed a glitch with the MW rendering : while the Sun is selected, moving around the MW makes its luminosity jump suddenly. I don't think I had this effect with the previous render.cpp.
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"
- t00fri
- Developer
- Posts: 8772
- Joined: 29.03.2002
- Age: 22
- With us: 22 years 7 months
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
Cham wrote:Fridger,
your last render.cpp is working. However, I just noticed a glitch with the MW rendering : while the Sun is selected, moving around the MW makes its luminosity jump suddenly. I don't think I had this effect with the previous render.cpp.
Oh yes! That's a left over from my galaxy tuning parallel efforts. Please replace in line 7145 again
ri = 0.5 by ri = -0.1
Sorry...
Bye Fridger