t00fri wrote:...And how about doing one job really well before moving to the next one ...I know, the principle of "small steps" ...
Sure, but this is a dev decision, we, non coders can just propose, you guys decide what's best...
Cham wrote:...According to the pictures included in the pack above, my "pastel green" used for the location labels is harder to read than the "vivid grass green" used in the original color set. Should I revert to the "vivid grass green" ?
Opinion needed.
ANDREA wrote:Cham wrote: ---BTW, having you modified the code, is there any hope to have another change, allowing ALL orbits and labels to be visible up to a distance from Sun of, say, thrice the Pluto distance?
If you remember, Buggs and I stopped the evolution of the Ptolemaic, Tychonic and Copernican Solar System just for this reason: the labels disappear when distance from Sun changes too much, and this makes impossible to have a clear idea of these Solar Systems complexity and difference from the real one.
Any possibility?
I remember you this thread:
http://www.celestiaproject.net/forum/viewtopic ... 69&start=0
and this one:
http://www.celestiaproject.net/forum/viewtopic ... tem+labels
(Fridger, do you remember this?Any possibility, please?)toofri wrote:As I mentioned to you privately, the best would probably be to allow for an ON|OFF flag for dynamical label display in celestia.cfg
Thank you.
Bye
Andrea
Well, I'll do another one, but I supposed it was ON topic because it started as follows:Cham wrote:Andrea, your request is off-topic. You should make a new one instead.
Andrea wrote:BTW, having you modified the code, is there any hope to have another change?
ElChristou wrote:Andrea, Cham is right, a bit off topic even if related. Now you should insist a bit for your problem, try also from the Lua side (who knows), but definitively don't give up with those historical systems!
Code: Select all
Orbits :
Planet: 0.0, 0.4, 1.0
Moon: 0.43, 0.0, 0.55
Asteroid: 0.35, 0.2, 0.0
Comet: 0.45, 0.44, 0.11
Spacecraft: 0.4, 0.4, 0.4
Stellar: 0.5, 0.5, 0.8
Labels :
Planet: 0.15, 0.74, 1.0
Moon: 0.85, 0.45, 0.91
Asteroid: 0.84, 0.62, 0.28
Comet: 0.87, 1.0, 0.43
Spacecraft: 0.73, 0.78, 0.90
LocationLabel : (line 4787)
0.22, 0.94, 0.44
t00fri wrote:One of the issues to take into account is that due to the largely different distance scales one has to incorporate the label fading differently for the three DSO varieties.
Code: Select all
Nebulas labels :
1.0, 0.25, 0.25
Cham wrote:t00fri wrote:One of the issues to take into account is that due to the largely different distance scales one has to incorporate the label fading differently for the three DSO varieties.
Agreed. Try also the colors as defined in my previous reply.
I intend to give a red shade to the nebula labels, and a green variation to the globular cluster :Code: Select all
Nebulas labels :
1.0, 0.25, 0.25
Red isn't much used (except, of course, for the selected path), and green as been used only for the location labels. After that, I think we'll have used ALL colors we could define for Celestia (without "overlapping"), while satisfying the readability criteria.
Code: Select all
Nebula "M42"
{
Mesh "M42-43.3ds"
Radius 12
RA 5.5833
Dec -5.4951
Distance 1177.748
AbsMag -4.1
}
Nebula "M43"
{
RA 5.592
Dec -5.31
Distance 1177.748
AbsMag -3.0
}
Nebula "NGC 1977"
{
Mesh "NGC1977.3ds"
Radius 7
RA 5.590
#Dec -4.795
Dec -4.785
Distance 1177.748
AbsMag -2.1
}