New careers for founders of OpenSource Sky Simulations

General discussion about Celestia that doesn't fit into other forums.
Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 7 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

New careers for founders of OpenSource Sky Simulations

Post #1by t00fri » 09.06.2007, 18:21

Stellarium 0.90 wrote:
ESO became interested in using Stellarium as a way to offer their enormous archives of sky data to professional astronomers in an attractive and easy to use program, and they hired project founder Fabien Chereau who is now working full-time on Stellarium.



Bye Fridger
Last edited by t00fri on 09.06.2007, 19:03, edited 1 time in total.
Image

ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Post #2by ElChristou » 09.06.2007, 18:36

Normal; it's in such case that one understand why the polish is sometime as important and sometime more important than the product... I'm not saying Stellarium is a bad soft, I'm saying the polish call attention and make the soft attractive for mass use...
Image

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 7 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #3by t00fri » 09.06.2007, 19:31

Stellarium (0.90) is all BUT bad software:

Stellarium README wrote:++ Thanks to ++

The celestia project team from which I borrowed many code parts (GPL license).

Chris Laurel (claurel (at) shatters.net) who makes Celestia.

The orbit.cpp/h and solve.h files are directly borrowed from Celestia (Chris Laurel). (GPL license)

Other pieces of code and ideas are from Celestia too (GPL license).


Bye Fridger
Image

ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Post #4by ElChristou » 09.06.2007, 21:10

ElChristou wrote:Normal; it's in such case that one understand why the polish is sometime as important and sometime more important than the product... I'm not saying Stellarium is a bad soft, I'm saying the polish call attention and make the soft attractive for mass use...


Who says Stellarium was bad?
What I mean above is that a well packed/polished soft is always attractive. I'm not surprised at all ESA want to use Stellarium.
Image


Return to “Celestia Users”