Cassini over the blue top of Saturn

General discussion about Celestia that doesn't fit into other forums.
Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Cassini over the blue top of Saturn

Post #1by t00fri » 04.12.2006, 00:22

Kind of a cute view today:

Cassini flying over the blue top of Saturn. The image
uses Cham's new Cassini model and shows also my
improved MilkyWay view on the right along with Chris' new
fuzzy stars...

Everything part of Celestia-1.5.0pre1 very soon or NOW in
CVS. Only my blue-topped Saturn texture is not to be
found there ;-)

Bye Fridger

(EDIT): As it turned out below, the Cassini model is by
Jestr, and NOT the latest default version by Cham.

Image
Last edited by t00fri on 04.12.2006, 00:58, edited 2 times in total.
Image

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10190
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years
Location: NY, USA

Post #2by selden » 04.12.2006, 00:36

That is *not* the model of Cassini that I get when I do a cvs checkout. I'm still getting the old 3ds version, although it's dated December 3rd. I deleted it and did another checkout and still got the old one :(
Selden

Avatar
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 8 months
Location: Montreal

Post #3by Cham » 04.12.2006, 00:41

That picture is very weird. The rings shadows are all the way around Saturn, and the gray galactic blobs have a clear cut fade out. Also, there are some strange artefacts on the model (on the small sphere).

Selden,

the "new" Cassini model is simply the old one with a better shading. I didn't changed the mesh itself, except patching few small holes here and there, and smoothing a sphere.
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

Avatar
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 8 months
Location: Montreal

Post #4by Cham » 04.12.2006, 00:45

Here's a similar view, on my version (look at the moons, by the way. They are glowing like stars and I don't think this is right) :

Image
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #5by t00fri » 04.12.2006, 00:50

selden wrote:That is *not* the model of Cassini that I get when I do a cvs checkout. I'm still getting the old 3ds version, although it's dated December 3rd. I deleted it and did another checkout and still got the old one :(


Selden,

you are right. Above, the Cassini model from the add-on by Jestr is shown. It accidentally sneaked in via the extras folder. The one that I updated today is a much more simplistic edition. No idea what's going on. I am not knowledgable with models. Usually no interest. Sorry.

Bye Fridger
Image

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #6by t00fri » 04.12.2006, 00:53

Cham,

yes, I am aware since a long time about Chris' "glowing moons" . I think I wrote it several times to him in the past....

Bye Fridger
Image

Avatar
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 8 months
Location: Montreal

Post #7by Cham » 04.12.2006, 00:57

The only diferences between the original Cassini model and Jestr version are textures. Jestr applied some textures on the original model but the mesh itself is the same (AFAIK). The one I made is simply the original version which I've updated for Celestia 1.5.0, since its shadings were incorrect. I also patched few holes on the mesh, and like I've said, smoothed the small sphere since it was too crude for my taste.
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 1 month

Post #8by Malenfant » 04.12.2006, 01:26

You did see this image taken from over the northern hemisphere, right?

http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=2326

The bluish hues are noticeably absent from the viewing geometry there. It seems that this colouration is a photometric response related to the phase angle.

And I much prefer Cham's image, star-like moons notwithstanding.
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #9by t00fri » 06.12.2006, 10:08

It is indeed interesting but not too surprising that in this Cassini shot
from Oct 30 2006 of the northern blue top of Saturn the
typical blue color was not observed.

http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=2326

Here are some respective comments by a physicist ;-):
---------------------------------------------------------

From its unique perspective high above the planet, Cassini looks down
upon Saturn's murky northern hemisphere. Note that in this view,
the phase angle was VERY high (150 degrees) such that we largely see
diffuse reflection of the sun's light at Saturn's cloud surface.

There is no doubt that in face-on vision the northern hemisphere is
(presently) blue. Here is a true-color reminder:

http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=753

Diffuse reflection usually includes a color shift due to
partial absorption of the R,G,B color components in the material, here
Saturn's northern clouds.

Image

(The illustration is from here http://www.merck.de/servlet/PB/menu/1403770/index.html)

The observed color shift in diffusely reflected light then teaches us
about the absorptive properties of the material.


As a (trivial) illustration, I made a little experiment with GIMP, taking
the above blue image in direct vision and reduced the blue component
strongly, and green to a lesser extent (<=> simulation of absorption)
. Red remained unaffected. Here is the result, with the resulting color
on the right corresponding about to what is seen in this 150 degree
phase angle shot.

Image

Bye Fridger
Image

zeraeiro
Posts: 32
Joined: 19.07.2006
With us: 18 years 2 months
Location: Porto, Portugal

Post #10by zeraeiro » 06.12.2006, 21:56

The milkyway looks rather lame. Why not use real data instead?

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #11by t00fri » 06.12.2006, 22:21

zeraeiro wrote:The milkyway looks rather lame. Why not use real data instead?


What do you mean? Celestia cannot display individual stars beyond a distance of 16 ly. It actually doesn't look lame, if you adjust your monitor correctly.

Bye Fridger
Image

zeraeiro
Posts: 32
Joined: 19.07.2006
With us: 18 years 2 months
Location: Porto, Portugal

Post #12by zeraeiro » 27.12.2006, 19:40

t00fri wrote:
zeraeiro wrote:The milkyway looks rather lame. Why not use real data instead?

What do you mean? Celestia cannot display individual stars beyond a distance of 16 ly. It actually doesn't look lame, if you adjust your monitor correctly.

Bye Fridger


I was talking about something like several levels. When seeing the milky way in a distance (with all of it in the FOV) maybe render what we know about the arm structure with 3D nebula with some stars embedded.

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #13by t00fri » 27.12.2006, 20:24

zeraeiro wrote:
t00fri wrote:
zeraeiro wrote:The milkyway looks rather lame. Why not use real data instead?

What do you mean? Celestia cannot display individual stars beyond a distance of 16 ly. It actually doesn't look lame, if you adjust your monitor correctly.

Bye Fridger

I was talking about something like several levels. When seeing the milky way in a distance (with all of it in the FOV) maybe render what we know about the arm structure with 3D nebula with some stars embedded.


In Celestia 1.5.0 ALL knowledge about the arm structure of our galaxy is /concisely/ implemented! As I pointed out already, we cannot display individual stars beyond a distance of 16 ly for reasons of accuracy.

Bye Fridger
Image

zeraeiro
Posts: 32
Joined: 19.07.2006
With us: 18 years 2 months
Location: Porto, Portugal

Post #14by zeraeiro » 27.12.2006, 23:58

t00fri wrote:
zeraeiro wrote:
t00fri wrote:
zeraeiro wrote:The milkyway looks rather lame. Why not use real data instead?

What do you mean? Celestia cannot display individual stars beyond a distance of 16 ly. It actually doesn't look lame, if you adjust your monitor correctly.

Bye Fridger

I was talking about something like several levels. When seeing the milky way in a distance (with all of it in the FOV) maybe render what we know about the arm structure with 3D nebula with some stars embedded.

In Celestia 1.5.0 ALL knowledge about the arm structure of our galaxy is /concisely/ implemented! As I pointed out already, we cannot display individual stars beyond a distance of 16 ly for reasons of accuracy.

Bye Fridger


Ok, sorry my bad then, I'm new to Celestia and I haven't tried 1.5 yet. But about the arm structure, although I haven't seen it yet in 1.5, maybe it could have some better graphics, not the real ones, but maybe photos from M83 in 3D making it look more real.

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10190
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years
Location: NY, USA

Post #15by selden » 28.12.2006, 00:11

Here's what the Milky Way looks like in Celestia v1.5.0pre2. I don't think there's any need to fake it with some other galaxy...

Image
Selden

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #16by t00fri » 28.12.2006, 00:28

I like it, Selden ;-)

Bye Fridger
Image

zeraeiro
Posts: 32
Joined: 19.07.2006
With us: 18 years 2 months
Location: Porto, Portugal

Post #17by zeraeiro » 19.01.2007, 15:25

Here's what the Milky Way looks like in Celestia v1.5.0pre2. I don't think there's any need to fake it with some other galaxy...


WOW, very nice indeed. I only knew the rendering from 1.4, that's why I asked the previous question.

Avatar
LordFerret M
Posts: 737
Joined: 24.08.2006
Age: 68
With us: 18 years 1 month
Location: NJ USA

Post #18by LordFerret » 20.01.2007, 02:59

I like it too, it appears to be far more robust compared to what I see in v1.4.1 :D

While I see you have 'our' location marked, all that's missing in that picture is the label "You are here". :wink:

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #19by t00fri » 20.01.2007, 10:53

Here is once more my annotated version ouf our present
MilkyWay template.
Image

and here is again my version with the pulsar catalog
(<--Selden's add-on) superimposed, exhibiting this
remarkable agreement with the arms of our template!
Image

Bye Fridger
Image

Avatar
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 8 months
Location: Montreal

Post #20by Cham » 20.01.2007, 17:50

Fridger,

why the MW annotation isn't in the CVS version ?
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"


Return to “Celestia Users”