Pollux hosts a "planet"

General physics and astronomy discussions not directly related to Celestia
Topic author
abramson
Posts: 408
Joined: 22.07.2003
With us: 21 years 4 months
Location: Bariloche, Argentina

Pollux hosts a "planet"

Post #1by abramson » 28.08.2006, 23:03

Finally, a "planet" has been found orbiting a first magnitude star. I read the news here:
http://skytonight.com/news/home/3750872.html
Note the uncompromising title, avoiding the use of the term "planet"...

The forthcomming paper in A&A (http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065445) has an acceptance date in june, but I don't remember it mentioned here.

Orbital elements:

Period [days] 589.64 ?± 0.81
Tperiastron [JD] 2447739.02 ?± 4.5
K [m s^??’1] 41.0 ?± 1.6
e 0.02 ?± 0.03
?‰ [deg] 354.58 ?± 95.65
f(m) [solar masses] (4.21 ?± 0.48 ) ?—10^??’9
m sin i [MJupiter] 2.30?± 0.45
a [AU] 1.64 ?± 0.27
rms [ms^??’1] 20.6 (17.1)


Guillermo

granthutchison
Developer
Posts: 1863
Joined: 21.11.2002
With us: 22 years

Post #2by granthutchison » 28.08.2006, 23:46

Pollux b has been available in extrasolar.ssc on the CVS tree since January (file version 1.66), although I logged it as "HD 62509 b", so maybe no-one noticed ... :)
Download it here: http://celestia.cvs.sourceforge.net/celestia/celestia/data/extrasolar.ssc

Grant

Topic author
abramson
Posts: 408
Joined: 22.07.2003
With us: 21 years 4 months
Location: Bariloche, Argentina

Post #3by abramson » 29.08.2006, 01:25

Oh, I see, Grant, thanks! Somehow, I guessed this was known news to some (acceptance in june, must have been in the arXiv at least since then...). I just happened to read it today at the Sky and Telescope website...

Guillermo

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months

Post #4by Malenfant » 29.08.2006, 04:44

Yeah, I remember reading about this a while back too. Oddly enough the date on the article is today, so I guess the folks at S&T were a bit slow on the uptake? ;)

Still, it's cool. A gas giant orbiting a red giant, now that would make for some good space art! :)
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system

ajtribick
Developer
Posts: 1855
Joined: 11.08.2003
With us: 21 years 4 months

Post #5by ajtribick » 05.09.2006, 21:19

Malenfant wrote:Still, it's cool. A gas giant orbiting a red giant, now that would make for some good space art! :)


I wonder if a star like Pollux would appear spherical - I've seen models of Betelgeuse which suggest it's really distorted with huge convection cells all over the place, but would this be noticeable on a K-giant like Pollux?

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months

Post #6by Malenfant » 05.09.2006, 21:36

chaos syndrome wrote:
Malenfant wrote:Still, it's cool. A gas giant orbiting a red giant, now that would make for some good space art! :)

I wonder if a star like Pollux would appear spherical - I've seen models of Betelgeuse which suggest it's really distorted with huge convection cells all over the place, but would this be noticeable on a K-giant like Pollux?


Probably not... I think Pollux is in its Horizontal Branch (helium burning) phase which is fairly stable, whereas Betelgeuse is a more massive and much larger supergiant in its AGB phase, which is more unstable.
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system

ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 10 months

Post #7by ElChristou » 05.09.2006, 22:58

Malenfant wrote:
chaos syndrome wrote:
Malenfant wrote:Still, it's cool. A gas giant orbiting a red giant, now that would make for some good space art! :)

I wonder if a star like Pollux would appear spherical - I've seen models of Betelgeuse which suggest it's really distorted with huge convection cells all over the place, but would this be noticeable on a K-giant like Pollux?

Probably not... I think Pollux is in its Horizontal Branch (helium burning) phase which is fairly stable, whereas Betelgeuse is a more massive and much larger supergiant in its AGB phase, which is more unstable.


8O hey, I'd love to know more about this and to see such distortion in Celestia... any good links on the topic?
Image

buggs_moran
Posts: 835
Joined: 27.09.2004
With us: 20 years 2 months
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Post #8by buggs_moran » 06.09.2006, 01:40

As usual, our receptors would be maxed out by either star and they would appear as white.
Homebrew:
WinXP Pro SP2
Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe
AMD Athlon XP 3000/333 2.16 GHz
1 GB Crucial RAM
80 GB WD SATA drive
ATI AIW 9600XT 128M

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months

Post #9by Malenfant » 06.09.2006, 01:44

buggs_moran wrote:As usual, our receptors would be maxed out by either star and they would appear as white.


...and we'd instantly blinded by their light if we were anywhere near them. Betelgeuse is about 60,000 times brighter than the sun, that's surely got to be enough to sear our eyes out if we even glanced in its general direction, assuming we're within a 5-10 AU of the surface anyway?

I wonder if we'd find the light light reflected off objects (eg a planet, the ground etc) blinding too?
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system

ajtribick
Developer
Posts: 1855
Joined: 11.08.2003
With us: 21 years 4 months

Post #10by ajtribick » 06.09.2006, 16:05

I guess I'm assuming you have some of the space-art-standard ultra-high-quality polaroid sunglasses about your person when looking in the "towards the star" kind of direction.

ElChristou wrote:8O hey, I'd love to know more about this and to see such distortion in Celestia... any good links on the topic?


Have a look at this page, it includes simulations of solar granulation, granulation on metal-poor stars, and a model of Betelgeuse. There are movies too.

MackTuesday
Posts: 11
Joined: 24.07.2003
With us: 21 years 4 months

Post #11by MackTuesday » 24.09.2006, 05:02

Malenfant wrote:
buggs_moran wrote:As usual, our receptors would be maxed out by either star and they would appear as white.

...and we'd instantly blinded by their light if we were anywhere near them. Betelgeuse is about 60,000 times brighter than the sun, that's surely got to be enough to sear our eyes out if we even glanced in its general direction, assuming we're within a 5-10 AU of the surface anyway?

I wonder if we'd find the light light reflected off objects (eg a planet, the ground etc) blinding too?



Betelgeuse's radius is about 650 times Sol's, so its surface area is 420,000 times as great. Per unit area, Betelgeuse releases about a seventh as much radiation as Sol, on average. If that radiation is fairly uniform, Betelgeuse might actually be easier on the eyes than Sol.

Pollux's radiation density is about half that of Sol.

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months

Post #12by Malenfant » 24.09.2006, 05:50

MackTuesday wrote:Betelgeuse's radius is about 650 times Sol's, so its surface area is 420,000 times as great. Per unit area, Betelgeuse releases about a seventh as much radiation as Sol, on average. If that radiation is fairly uniform, Betelgeuse might actually be easier on the eyes than Sol.

Pollux's radiation density is about half that of Sol.


Hm, maybe I was thinking more of the B V stars or something there then (which aren't THAT much bigger than Sol and a hell of a lot brighter).
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system


Return to “Physics and Astronomy”