Scale of space in Celestia is not correct?

General discussion about Celestia that doesn't fit into other forums.
Topic author
AlexChan
Posts: 33
Joined: 29.09.2004
With us: 20 years 1 month

Scale of space in Celestia is not correct?

Post #1by AlexChan » 21.06.2006, 23:53

When I saw some picture which were taken by NASA,
the view is different to Celestia,
for example, this one

Image

We can see another moon behind Titan clearly,
but in Celestia, we just can see a dot of light only.
Is there have something wrong in the display rendering of Celetsia?

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months

Post #2by Malenfant » 22.06.2006, 00:25

You got a link to that picture on the NASA site? Might help track down what time it was taken so we can see what it looks like in Celestia...

And are you sure that moon is behind Titan? Looks like it's in front of it to me, if it was behind then the dark side of Titan would cover it up (I checked and the smaller moon is definitely in the 'dark side" area)
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system

DonAVP
Posts: 109
Joined: 01.12.2005
With us: 18 years 11 months
Location: SF BayArea

Post #3by DonAVP » 22.06.2006, 01:27

You also need to realize that the focal length of the lens is important when it comes to things like this. If you get the date and time like on the other post you should be able to duplicated the image. You may take some time getting it however. Here is a link showing you what I mean.
cel://Follow/Sol/2004-03-28T07:26:15.21 ... 9&lm=49152
Notice the FOV in the lower right of the screen. What you are looking at is the Earth with the Sun behind it. The POV is out at Jupiter. Now what is the scale :roll: ?

Don
Don't know anything

buggs_moran
Posts: 835
Joined: 27.09.2004
With us: 20 years 1 month
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Post #4by buggs_moran » 22.06.2006, 01:44

Definitely get the distance and date from the photo when you see them online. You have to adjust your field of view using < and >. I have recreated many Nasa shots this way.
Homebrew:
WinXP Pro SP2
Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe
AMD Athlon XP 3000/333 2.16 GHz
1 GB Crucial RAM
80 GB WD SATA drive
ATI AIW 9600XT 128M

buggs_moran
Posts: 835
Joined: 27.09.2004
With us: 20 years 1 month
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Post #5by buggs_moran » 22.06.2006, 03:40

Proof of concept...

Image
Homebrew:

WinXP Pro SP2

Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe

AMD Athlon XP 3000/333 2.16 GHz

1 GB Crucial RAM

80 GB WD SATA drive

ATI AIW 9600XT 128M

Avatar
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Montreal

Post #6by Cham » 22.06.2006, 04:12

According to this web site, the other moon is enceladus :

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/i ... ageID=2172

I'm unable to get that view at that date. Maybe my Cassini trajectory isn't up-to-date ?
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months

Post #7by Malenfant » 22.06.2006, 05:37

Images taken using red, green and blue spectral filters were combined to create this natural color view. The images were obtained on Feb. 5, 2006, using the Cassini spacecraft narrow-angle camera at a distance of 4.1 million kilometers (2.5 million miles) from Enceladus and 5.3 million kilometers (3.3 miles) from Titan. Resolution in the original images was 25 kilometers (16 miles) per pixel on Enceladus and 32 kilometers (20 miles) per pixel on Titan. The view has been magnified by a factor of two.


So I was right, Enceladus IS in front of Titan. Which makes the difference in scale all the more boggling really... Titan is over a million km further from Cassini here and it still looks huge by comparison!
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months
Location: NY, USA

Post #8by selden » 22.06.2006, 11:30

Cham,

Many of the orbits used for Saturn's moons are just Keplerian ellipses. As a result, they don't slowly evolve as the orbits of the real moons do.
Selden

buggs_moran
Posts: 835
Joined: 27.09.2004
With us: 20 years 1 month
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Post #9by buggs_moran » 22.06.2006, 12:08

You really get a scale idea when you line them all up. (Note: Just in case someone anyone asks, this is forced in the ssc file, it does not happen in reality.)

Image

[/code]
Homebrew:

WinXP Pro SP2

Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe

AMD Athlon XP 3000/333 2.16 GHz

1 GB Crucial RAM

80 GB WD SATA drive

ATI AIW 9600XT 128M

Johaen
Posts: 341
Joined: 14.01.2006
With us: 18 years 10 months
Location: IL, USA

Post #10by Johaen » 22.06.2006, 12:47

buggs_moran wrote:You really get a scale idea when you line them all up...


Oh wow... that is a really cool picture. :) I'll have to figure out how to do that on my own...
AMD Athlon X2 4400+; 2GB OCZ Platinum RAM; 320GB SATA HDD; NVidia EVGA GeForce 7900GT KO, PCI-e, 512MB, ForceWare ver. 163.71; Razer Barracuda AC-1 7.1 Gaming Soundcard; Abit AN8 32X motherboard; 600 watt Kingwin Mach1 PSU; Windows XP Media Center SP2;

buggs_moran
Posts: 835
Joined: 27.09.2004
With us: 20 years 1 month
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Post #11by buggs_moran » 22.06.2006, 14:22

It is a good experiment in playing with ssc files, but I can upload it if you like.
Homebrew:

WinXP Pro SP2

Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe

AMD Athlon XP 3000/333 2.16 GHz

1 GB Crucial RAM

80 GB WD SATA drive

ATI AIW 9600XT 128M

buggs_moran
Posts: 835
Joined: 27.09.2004
With us: 20 years 1 month
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Post #12by buggs_moran » 27.06.2006, 16:41

Homebrew:

WinXP Pro SP2

Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe

AMD Athlon XP 3000/333 2.16 GHz

1 GB Crucial RAM

80 GB WD SATA drive

ATI AIW 9600XT 128M


Return to “Celestia Users”