Developing new addon: asteroids larger than 250km
Developing new addon: asteroids larger than 250km
The standard asteroids list for Celestia only has the first four asteroids discovered (Ceres, Pallas, Juno, Vesta), plus an additional 12 of special interest.
The first four asteroids discovered are not the four largest asteroids. Ceres, Pallas and Vesta are three of the four largest asteroids, but Juno is a substantially smaller body that only ranks ninth in size (about seventh in mass) of the asteroids in the main asteroid belt.
The ten largest asteroids in size order are (source: Wikipedia):
1 Ceres
4 Vesta
2 Pallas
10 Hygiea
511 Davida
704 Interamnia
52 Europa
624 Hektor
3 Juno
87 Sylvia
Juno's ranking ninth in size would surprise many people. This is why I believe the creation of an addon that includes the other asteroids that are larger than Juno would be a valuable addon. It could even be incorporated into Celestia's main asteroid list.
I have tried creating orbits for a couple of the asteroids (I think I used the database at http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi) but I could not be sure I had the orbits right. When I created Ceres as a test, my version of Ceres was offset from the real Ceres by 30 degrees.
The first four asteroids discovered are not the four largest asteroids. Ceres, Pallas and Vesta are three of the four largest asteroids, but Juno is a substantially smaller body that only ranks ninth in size (about seventh in mass) of the asteroids in the main asteroid belt.
The ten largest asteroids in size order are (source: Wikipedia):
1 Ceres
4 Vesta
2 Pallas
10 Hygiea
511 Davida
704 Interamnia
52 Europa
624 Hektor
3 Juno
87 Sylvia
Juno's ranking ninth in size would surprise many people. This is why I believe the creation of an addon that includes the other asteroids that are larger than Juno would be a valuable addon. It could even be incorporated into Celestia's main asteroid list.
I have tried creating orbits for a couple of the asteroids (I think I used the database at http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi) but I could not be sure I had the orbits right. When I created Ceres as a test, my version of Ceres was offset from the real Ceres by 30 degrees.
Last edited by bdm on 30.04.2006, 05:29, edited 1 time in total.
I found my error in the ssc file for Ceres. I used LongOfPericenter and it should have been ArgOfPericenter. When I made that correction the two copies of Ceres were much closer together.
I also used the database at http://www.alpheratz.net/murison/calcul ... ements.php
Here are two asteroids I have done so far. Are there any improvements I can make before including the orbital elements for the remaining bodies?
I also used the database at http://www.alpheratz.net/murison/calcul ... ements.php
Here are two asteroids I have done so far. Are there any improvements I can make before including the orbital elements for the remaining bodies?
Code: Select all
#
# Asteroid list - asteroids with diameters larger than 250 km that are not in Celestia
# Compiled by bdm into celestia format
#
# Data sources
# ============
# List of largest asteroids: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_noteworthy_asteroids
# Orbital elements: http://www.alpheratz.net/murison/calculators/OrbitalElements.php
# Rotation periods: http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/lists/LightcurveDat.html
# Albedoes: http://www.psi.edu/pds/archive/update05/albedo/data/albedos.tab
#
# There are 13 known asteroids larger than 250 km. Only 1 Ceres, 2 Pallas, 3 Juno and 4 Vesta are in Celestia
# The others are:
#
# 10 Hygiea
# 15 Eunomia
# 16 Psyche
# 31 Euphrosyne
# 52 Europa
# 87 Sylvia
# 511 Davida
# 624 Hektor
# 704 Interamnia
#
"Ceres_test" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
# Texture - goes here
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is likely incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here
Albedo 0.1132
Radius 203.6
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 4.59870681
SemiMajorAxis 2.76539484
Eccentricity 0.08001022
Inclination 10.586877
AscendingNode 80.409695
MeanAnomaly 129.983355
ArgOfPericenter 73.231686
Epoch 2453812
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 9.075
}
"Hygiea" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
# Texture - goes here
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is likely incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here
Albedo 0.0717
Radius 203.6
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 5.55729311
SemiMajorAxis 3.13744077
Eccentricity 0.11823647
Inclination 3.841847
AscendingNode 283.458555
MeanAnomaly 20.723915
ArgOfPericenter 313.038262
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 27.623
}
bdm,
Rather than using "fan" sites, I'd suggest that you get current ephemeris data from the IAU's Minor Planet Center's database at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. That way you reduce the possibility of transcription errors or out of date information.
See http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/mpc.html
and http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/MPEph/MPEph.html
Rather than using "fan" sites, I'd suggest that you get current ephemeris data from the IAU's Minor Planet Center's database at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. That way you reduce the possibility of transcription errors or out of date information.
See http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/mpc.html
and http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/MPEph/MPEph.html
Selden
The original site I used did not give Julian dates for the epoch so I'm not using it any longer. I've just used this JPL site for orbital elements, with good results: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi
With the orbital elements subject to change due to planetary perturbations, long-term accuracy is difficult to achieve.
To test the accuracy, I've included the JPL and IAU orbital elements for the first four asteroids in one file. The JPL and IAU elements give orbits that are fairly close together, and the Celestia asteroids are relatively far away. Perhaps Chris needs to update the orbital elements for the main asteroids?
The orbital elements for the first four asteroids are given here. The IAU elements are given as-is, whereas the JPL elements were rounded to 8 decimal places.
With the orbital elements subject to change due to planetary perturbations, long-term accuracy is difficult to achieve.
To test the accuracy, I've included the JPL and IAU orbital elements for the first four asteroids in one file. The JPL and IAU elements give orbits that are fairly close together, and the Celestia asteroids are relatively far away. Perhaps Chris needs to update the orbital elements for the main asteroids?
The orbital elements for the first four asteroids are given here. The IAU elements are given as-is, whereas the JPL elements were rounded to 8 decimal places.
Code: Select all
# 1 Ceres
"Ceres_jpl" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
# Texture - goes here
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is likely incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here
Albedo 0.1132
Radius 424.20
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 4.59879365
SemiMajorAxis 2.76539484
Eccentricity 0.08001016
Inclination 10.58687960
AscendingNode 80.40969394
MeanAnomaly 129.98335927
ArgOfPericenter 73.23169434
Epoch 2453800.5 # 2006-Mar-06.0
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 9.075
}
"Ceres_iau" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
# Texture - goes here
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is likely incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here
Albedo 0.1132
Radius 424.20
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 4.60
SemiMajorAxis 2.7653949
Eccentricity 0.0800102
Inclination 10.58687
AscendingNode 80.40970
MeanAnomaly 129.98342
ArgOfPericenter 73.23162
Epoch 2453800.5 # 2006-Mar-06.0
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 9.075
}
# 2 Pallas
"Pallas_jpl" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
# Texture - goes here
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is likely incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here
Albedo 0.1587
Radius 249.03
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 4.61591668
SemiMajorAxis 2.77225498
Eccentricity 0.23064442
Inclination 34.84025148
AscendingNode 173.14463064
MeanAnomaly 114.18321229
ArgOfPericenter 310.41822729
Epoch 2453800.5 # 2006-Mar-06.0
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 7.8132
}
"Pallas_iau" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
# Texture - goes here
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is likely incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here
Albedo 0.1587
Radius 249.03
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 4.62
SemiMajorAxis 2.7722550
Eccentricity 0.2306445
Inclination 34.84024
AscendingNode 173.14461
MeanAnomaly 114.18325
ArgOfPericenter 310.41822
Epoch 2453800.5 # 2006-Mar-06.0
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 7.8132
}
# 3 Juno
"Juno_jpl" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
# Texture - goes here
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is likely incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here
Albedo 0.1587
Radius 249.03
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 4.35778813
SemiMajorAxis 2.66791470
Eccentricity 0.25827561
Inclination 12.97125069
AscendingNode 170.12397558
MeanAnomaly 30.72778180
ArgOfPericenter 247.83526289
Epoch 2453800.5 # 2006-Mar-06.0
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 7.210
}
"Juno_iau" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
# Texture - goes here
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is likely incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here
Albedo 0.1587
Radius 249.03
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 4.36
SemiMajorAxis 2.6679148
Eccentricity 0.2582755
Inclination 12.97124
AscendingNode 170.12404
MeanAnomaly 30.72777
ArgOfPericenter 247.83519
Epoch 2453800.5 # 2006-Mar-06.0
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 7.210
}
# 4 Vesta
"Vesta_jpl" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
# Texture - goes here
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is likely incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here
Albedo 0.4228
Radius 234.15
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 3.62857694
SemiMajorAxis 2.36130502
Eccentricity 0.08908830
Inclination 7.13351097
AscendingNode 103.92603212
MeanAnomaly 232.80482680
ArgOfPericenter 150.30944698
Epoch 2453800.5 # 2006-Mar-06.0
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 5.342
}
"Vesta_iau" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
# Texture - goes here
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is likely incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here
Albedo 0.4228
Radius 234.15
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 3.63
SemiMajorAxis 2.3613051
Eccentricity 0.0890882
Inclination 7.13351
AscendingNode 103.92607
MeanAnomaly 232.80490
ArgOfPericenter 150.30933
Epoch 2453800.5 # 2006-Mar-06.0
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 5.342
}
This sounds like an exciting project! I've always thought that the asteroids received something of a less-than-fair shake, and will be glad to see some accurate orbital representations of these subjects!
...John...
...John...
"To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe..."
--Carl Sagan
--Carl Sagan
I've got orbital elements for the 13 asteroids that have a radius larger than 125 km. A few notes:
- This list has nine asteroids, not six.
- I have not yet verified these for correctness. My method involved manual cut and paste, and it's possible I've made one or two errors.
- All asteroids in this list are given with their name only, except for Europa, which is given as "52 Europa". This is necessary because this asteroid shares a name with a well-known moon of Jupiter.
- I don't know how to assign colours to the asteroids. This is why all of them are grey. The source I have has U-B and B-V color indices but I don't know how to convert these to RGB, nor whether such conversion is possible with any degree of accuracy.
- The source for the orbital data was the "JPL Small-Body Database Browser", http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi
- Asteroids are given with radii, but most of the asteroids are not spherical. The actual shapes of the asteroids vary, but I lack the expertise to create suitable models.
- All orbital elements are subject to significant change over time. This will be most noticeable with 624 Hektor, which is a Trojan asteroid.
Code: Select all
#
# Asteroid list - asteroids with diameters larger than 250 km that are not in Celestia
# Compiled by bdm into celestia format
#
# Data sources
# ============
# List of largest asteroids: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_noteworthy_asteroids
# Orbital elements: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi
# Rotation periods: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi
# Albedoes: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi
#
# There are 13 known asteroids larger than 250 km. Only 1 Ceres, 2 Pallas, 3 Juno and 4 Vesta are in Celestia
# The others are:
#
# 10 Hygiea
# 15 Eunomia
# 16 Psyche
# 31 Euphrosyne
# 52 Europa
# 87 Sylvia
# 511 Davida
# 624 Hektor
# 704 Interamnia
# 10 Hygiea
"Hygiea" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
Texture "asteroid.*"
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here when created
Albedo 0.0717
Radius 203.6
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 5.55739809
SemiMajorAxis 3.13744078
Eccentricity 0.11823654
Inclination 3.84184137
AscendingNode 283.45855625
MeanAnomaly 20.72388364
ArgOfPericenter 313.03828971
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 27.623
}
# 15 Eunomia
"Eunomia" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
Texture "asteroid.*"
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here when created
Albedo 0.2094
Radius 127.67
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 4.29775312
SemiMajorAxis 2.64335509
Eccentricity 0.18707559
Inclination 11.73780835
AscendingNode 293.27363054
MeanAnomaly 263.17170406
ArgOfPericenter 97.89824531
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 6.083
}
# 16 Psyche
"Psyche" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
Texture "asteroid.*"
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here when created
Albedo 0.1203
Radius 126.58
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 4.99046084
SemiMajorAxis 2.92026076
Eccentricity 0.13946251
Inclination 3.09537975
AscendingNode 150.34748320
MeanAnomaly 62.21109199
ArgOfPericenter 227.93351284
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 4.196
}
# 31 Euphrosyne
"Euphrosyne" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
Texture "asteroid.*"
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here when created
Albedo 0.0543
Radius 127.95
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 5.59102942
SemiMajorAxis 3.15008581
Eccentricity 0.22600684
Inclination 26.31714294
AscendingNode 31.24084936
MeanAnomaly 321.59775936
ArgOfPericenter 62.01617773
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 5.531
}
# 52 Europa
"52 Europa" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
Texture "asteroid.*"
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here when created
Albedo 0.0578
Radius 151.25
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 5.46453419
SemiMajorAxis 3.10239170
Eccentricity 0.10223880
Inclination 7.46441555
AscendingNode 128.95110760
MeanAnomaly 88.52907454
ArgOfPericenter 343.80533806
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 5.633
}
# 87 Sylvia
"Sylvia" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
Texture "asteroid.*"
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here when created
Albedo 0.0435
Radius 130.47
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 6.51965067
SemiMajorAxis 3.48988205
Eccentricity 0.07971455
Inclination 10.85685528
AscendingNode 73.32899323
MeanAnomaly 83.67460324
ArgOfPericenter 265.95387233
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 5.184
}
# 511 Davida
"Davida" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
Texture "asteroid.*"
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here when created
Albedo 0.0540
Radius 163.03
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 5.63252329
SemiMajorAxis 3.16565218
Eccentricity 0.18561868
Inclination 15.93890365
AscendingNode 107.67208427
MeanAnomaly 212.66376281
ArgOfPericenter 338.56251275
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 5.1294
}
# 624 Hektor
"Hektor" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
Texture "asteroid.*"
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here when created
Albedo 0.025
Radius 112.5
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 11.94604323
SemiMajorAxis 5.22569333
Eccentricity 0.02383973
Inclination 18.19597287
AscendingNode 342.80080721
MeanAnomaly 134.73336010
ArgOfPericenter 184.89172567
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 6.921
}
# 704 Interamnia
"Interamnia" "Sun"
{
Class "asteroid"
Texture "asteroid.*"
Color [0.5 0.5 0.5 ] # Color is incorrect, assuming flat grey here
# Mesh - goes here when created
Albedo 0.0742
Radius 158.31
EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 5.35573480
SemiMajorAxis 3.06107456
Eccentricity 0.14965904
Inclination 17.29208993
AscendingNode 280.39627099
MeanAnomaly 295.98816393
ArgOfPericenter 95.80656116
}
Obliquity 0 # True value not known
EquatorAscendingNode 0 # True value not known
RotationPeriod 8.727
}
Last edited by bdm on 08.05.2006, 08:46, edited 2 times in total.
If anyone is up to the challenge of preparing asteroid models, here is a scientific paper that models the shapes of some of these asteroids. This paper also provides axial tilts for some of these asteroids.
http://www.rni.helsinki.fi/~mjk/IcarPIII.pdf
http://www.rni.helsinki.fi/~mjk/IcarPIII.pdf
UPDATE: I have checked the orbit figures given above. 511 Davida had the figure for the semimajor axis copied to the ascending node; the other figures were correct. I have corrected the figures.
All we need are textures and colours and it's good to go. Models would be good as well but they are not essential.
Can anyone offer suggestions on what would be suitable textures to use for these asteroids? I also don't know what colour they should be other than most of them being very dark.
All we need are textures and colours and it's good to go. Models would be good as well but they are not essential.
Can anyone offer suggestions on what would be suitable textures to use for these asteroids? I also don't know what colour they should be other than most of them being very dark.
I have edited the list to include textures for the asteroids. Without knowing their true textures, I've chosen to give them the usual "asteroid.*" texture.
Most of these asteroids require models but I cannot make models for myself. So these will render as spheres, even though that is not really accurate. Juno is treated this way in the Celestia asteroids.ssc file so I think that should be OK.
I don't know what colour to set the asteroids, so I have left them with 50% grey. I notice that many of the asteroids in the Celestia asteroids file also skimps on colour information so I guess that's OK.
Would this be good enough for release?
Most of these asteroids require models but I cannot make models for myself. So these will render as spheres, even though that is not really accurate. Juno is treated this way in the Celestia asteroids.ssc file so I think that should be OK.
I don't know what colour to set the asteroids, so I have left them with 50% grey. I notice that many of the asteroids in the Celestia asteroids file also skimps on colour information so I guess that's OK.
Would this be good enough for release?
-
- Developer
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: 04.02.2005
- With us: 19 years 9 months
Bdm, for your asteroids model you can always use the default asteroid.cms; open it with a text editor and play with the values. You can do irregular spheres or whatever shape.
Concerning the whole addon, you should ask someone well skilled on those topics for a revision of your work before releasing (Grant Hutchinson?); this just to be sure all is 100% ok...
Anyway, Tx for the effort.
Concerning the whole addon, you should ask someone well skilled on those topics for a revision of your work before releasing (Grant Hutchinson?); this just to be sure all is 100% ok...
Anyway, Tx for the effort.
- t00fri
- Developer
- Posts: 8772
- Joined: 29.03.2002
- Age: 22
- With us: 22 years 7 months
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
In early 2002 I have extracted already 7309 asteroids from the
official published scientific resources and produced a corresponding .ssc
file.
Here is a funny image from the time, where I artificially enhanced the
albedo of all these asteroids such that all of them could be seen at the
same time!
Bye Fridger
official published scientific resources and produced a corresponding .ssc
file.
Here is a funny image from the time, where I artificially enhanced the
albedo of all these asteroids such that all of them could be seen at the
same time!
Bye Fridger
-
- Developer
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: 04.02.2005
- With us: 19 years 9 months
- t00fri
- Developer
- Posts: 8772
- Joined: 29.03.2002
- Age: 22
- With us: 22 years 7 months
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
ElChristou wrote:t00fri wrote:In early 2002 I have extracted already 7309 asteroids from the
official published scientific resources and produced a corresponding .ssc
file...
I suppose this mean the asteroids Bdm has extracted are already part of those 7309 bodies?
Certainly. The Universe is full of Asteroids. 13 are a rather small fraction...
Seriously: mass rendering of asteroids, say 250000 (!), are high on my todo list. But this is among the hardest mass-rendering tasks. The reason is that a proper octree structure (required for superfast rendering) is difficult to realize, since the asteroids are moving (unlike galaxies, for example!) . Yet I have some ideas to explore. We had that topic before, so I'll shut up now...
http://www.celestiaproject.net/forum/viewtopic ... sc&start=0
Bye Fridger
ElChristou wrote:Bdm, for your asteroids model you can always use the default asteroid.cms; open it with a text editor and play with the values. You can do irregular spheres or whatever shape.
Concerning the whole addon, you should ask someone well skilled on those topics for a revision of your work before releasing (Grant Hutchinson?); this just to be sure all is 100% ok...
Anyway, Tx for the effort.
I didn't know that cms files were text files, thanks for the tip. Now all I need is to figure out how they work.
I have bookmarked on my other computer a scientific paper that gives approximate shapes for the majority of these asteroids based on light curve studies. Who knows, I may yet have reasonably accurate shapes for these asteroids.
Toofri's big list of asteroids would be useful for people who require many asteroids, but that's not what I need. My needs are a complete list of the largest asteroids which Celestia currently doesn't provide. In particular, I needed 10 Hygiea to be included because it's the largest asteroid that's not included in Celestia's standard list of asteroids. I chose to include other asteroids as well to show 3 Juno in its proper place as the ninth largest asteroid.
I have a preliminary version of the addon available for download and evaluation at the following location: http://www.bdm.id.au/download/large%20asteroids%201-0.zip
Size of addon: 5 kb
Includes CMS models for 10 Hygiea, 15 Eunomia, 16 Psyche, 52 Europa, 87 Sylvia. (being CMS models, these models are very approximate)
I have checked the positions of 10 Hygiea and 15 Eunomia against asteroid ephemerides at http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/MPEph/MPEph.html#summary
The SSC descriptions include rotation periods but not axial tilts and nodes.
Size of addon: 5 kb
Includes CMS models for 10 Hygiea, 15 Eunomia, 16 Psyche, 52 Europa, 87 Sylvia. (being CMS models, these models are very approximate)
I have checked the positions of 10 Hygiea and 15 Eunomia against asteroid ephemerides at http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/MPEph/MPEph.html#summary
The SSC descriptions include rotation periods but not axial tilts and nodes.
- t00fri
- Developer
- Posts: 8772
- Joined: 29.03.2002
- Age: 22
- With us: 22 years 7 months
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
bdm wrote:Toofri's big list of asteroids would be useful for people who require many asteroids, but that's not what I need. My needs are a complete list of the largest asteroids which Celestia currently doesn't provide.
My big list of course included also ALL the largest asteroids and the PERL script can easily sort and cut that list in size or magnitude according to individual needs! The list represented a complete, official asteroid catalogue. In addition an upgrade of respective ephemerides is only a CLICK in my case! Finally, no numbers were touched manually which greatly helps to avoid typos...
In general it is always a good idea to start Celestia projects from the /general/ side and specialize later. More people can profit this way and the solution is usually more versatile & "elegant"
If I'll find some spare time, I'll get back on this interesting culling task with /many/ moving asteroids. An appropriate octree structure in this case is kind of a math & coding challenge.
Bye Fridger
Toofri, how detailed is your large asteroid addon? My addon includes rotation periods for all nine asteroids, and rough CMS models for five of them. At present I don't have Color, EquatorAscendingNode or Obliquity, nor do I have different textures.
The approach I have taken for my addon was to provide a complete inventory of the large asteroids, and provide some detail where I could find it. I wanted to have a small addon that could provide some extra asteroids that I believe should be in Celestia by default. I'm hoping that the addon could be developed to the point where it could be incorporated into the default installation of Celestia. If not, it will provide a choice of addons for those that may need it.
Oh, and Toofri, could you kindly post a download link for your addon if you haven't already?
The approach I have taken for my addon was to provide a complete inventory of the large asteroids, and provide some detail where I could find it. I wanted to have a small addon that could provide some extra asteroids that I believe should be in Celestia by default. I'm hoping that the addon could be developed to the point where it could be incorporated into the default installation of Celestia. If not, it will provide a choice of addons for those that may need it.
Oh, and Toofri, could you kindly post a download link for your addon if you haven't already?
- t00fri
- Developer
- Posts: 8772
- Joined: 29.03.2002
- Age: 22
- With us: 22 years 7 months
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
bdm wrote:Toofri, how detailed is your large asteroid addon? My addon includes rotation periods for all nine asteroids, and rough CMS models for five of them. At present I don't have Color, EquatorAscendingNode or Obliquity, nor do I have different textures.
But why did you leave out EquatorAscendingNode and Obliquity? To reconstruct the complete orbits /precisely/ you need ALL orbital parameters and MUST transform them from the skyplane frame to the Celestia frame as usual, using quaternions. I suppose you did not ignore these required transformations?
The orbital parameters in the *.ssc files refer to the Celestia frame, while the ephemerides in the catalogs refer to the skyplane frame!
The lack of asteroidal data in the Celestia distribution is just due to lack of (qualified) developer time. Like we have recently incorporated the /complete/ revised NGC/IC catalog of galaxies, Celestia's data base will certainly be expanded to also include entire published catalogs with planetary nebulae, galactic clusters...and asteroids.The approach I have taken for my addon was to provide a complete inventory of the large asteroids, and provide some detail where I could find it. I wanted to have a small addon that could provide some extra asteroids that I believe should be in Celestia by default. I'm hoping that the addon could be developed to the point where it could be incorporated into the default installation of Celestia. If not, it will provide a choice of addons for those that may need it.
We certainly would not deal with just a few at this advanced point of code development. As I said, if you have any clever ideas about how an octree might be constructed for asteroids that would be extremely helpful!
Oh, and Toofri, could you kindly post a download link for your addon if you haven't already?
[ note my username is t00fri NOT Toofri , but never mind]
I did that work on asteroids ~4 years ago and the actual .ssc file + PERL script must be dumped somewhere on some media. All I can readily find now was my asteroid image from that time.
Meanwhile we have changed the respective code structure completely (octree culling!) such that these lists have to be regenerated anyhow (which is very easy with PERL).
Also I am usually not involved with making add-ons. As a Celestia developer, my work will be rather integrated into the official distribution when everyone is content with the state of the art.
Bye Fridger
I think you have confused EquatorAscendingNode and Obliquity with Ascending Node and Inclination here. EAN and Obliquity defined the rotation axis of the body, and Ascending Node and Inclination are orbital parameters.t00fri wrote:But why did you leave out EquatorAscendingNode and Obliquity?
I don't ever intend to release any addon, no matter how incomplete, without a full set of orbital parameters.
On the other hand, I have omitted the rotation parameters because I have not yet found good data for these.
t00fri wrote:[ note my username is t00fri NOT Toofri Wink , but never mind]
Noted ... if you're particular about using zeroes instead of oes then I will take care to include them.
t00fri wrote:To reconstruct the complete orbits /precisely/ you need ALL orbital parameters and MUST transform them from the skyplane frame to the Celestia frame as usual, using quaternions. I suppose you did not ignore these required transformations?
The orbital parameters in the *.ssc files refer to the Celestia frame, while the ephemerides in the catalogs refer to the skyplane frame!
What is the difference between the skyplane frame and the Celestia frame? I thought Celestia used orbital parameters in relation to the ecliptic.
I have checked the methodology by rendering Ceres, Pallas, Juno and Vesta in the same way and comparing the positions of these asteroids. The test asteroids were very close to the Celestia versions of the asteroids. I also checked two asteroids by using online ephemerides to compute the positions, and then comparing the positions in Celestia with the ephemerides. These also checked out to good accuracy. I intend to check the other seven in the next few days.