HB wrote:If you take into account that often the used software, for example with this multilingual feature is free software, coming from sites such as GNU or Sourceforge and that most of the software found is in the first place not directly designed for Win32 platforms but more or less based on Linux and Unix systems , then this huge army of Win32 developers are in a minority.
Ok, culturaly the FOSS movement has its roots in Unix, but that movement was started more than 20 years ago and is now pervasive even on Windows. And come on but ONE active windows developer?
HB wrote:It would be nice to announce to the Celestia-Community the new development (and needs)for Celestia in a earlier stage and keep them informed about the progress with it.
This was discussed at length on the forums, a patch was released, complete with instructions and even a prebuild binary. An annoucement was made on the mailing list. Honnestly what else could have been done?
The need for I18N on Windows is well known, to the point that 'hand made' translated versions have been released in several languages. That is even what motivated my working on it despite the fact that I haven't used Windows for ten years. I just can't stand the fact that dedicated people (non developers) litteraly waste their time translating strings in the source code, a task which has to be redone for each new release and can't be shared with other platforms, when all it took is two hours of a developer's time to enable gettext and take advantage of the existing catalog files.
HB wrote:In this stadium of development for Linux or Unix, it's becomes more difficult to get things working properly for Windows and to building it with MS C++ toolkit 2003.
Blame MS for developing its own standards. But in this case it was a development done specificaly for Windows.
HB wrote:Anyone who is using the science of Celestia will have a certain education level. Understanding good English is just a small part of it.
Try and explain that to the people who have spent days translating Celestia to other languages.
HB wrote:More or less I agree with some among us: it's a waste of precious developer time, CPU cycletime and memory.
I wouldn't call a two hour job a waste of time. Not doing it would have been.