8953 Moon Locations from USGS updated database

General discussion about Celestia that doesn't fit into other forums.
Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 7 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

8953 Moon Locations from USGS updated database

Post #1by t00fri » 21.12.2005, 22:32

Hi all,

Grant had spotted the large update of the USGS location labels for the Moon from 1857 ==> 8953 (!) and asked me to implement my importance weights into these new data.

This avoids overcrowded labels at any zoom level!

OK, this was easy to do and here is an illustration of the result

Image

The trick is of course that for larger distance only the biggest locations are labelled...

Image



My detailed, commented derivation of the importance weights is to be found in my Maple worksheet (~2.5MB, PDF format):

http://www.shatters.net/~t00fri/images/moon_weights.pdf

The striking feature is the almost perfect Normal distribution (Gaussian) of the log(size) of the craters around an average crater size of ~15.8 km:

Image

Once more, this is a Celestia related application of (PERL) scripts, hey ElChristou ;-)
Bye Fridger

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months

Post #2by Malenfant » 22.12.2005, 00:34

whoa nelly, what's that moon map? That looks much more detailed than the one I have.
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 7 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #3by t00fri » 22.12.2005, 00:36

Malenfant wrote:whoa nelly, what's that moon map? That looks much more detailed than the one I have.


I made it long ago. It's 8k.
But that's not the point of this thread ;-)

Bye Fridger

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months

Post #4by Malenfant » 22.12.2005, 01:21

t00fri wrote:
Malenfant wrote:whoa nelly, what's that moon map? That looks much more detailed than the one I have.

I made it long ago. It's 8k.
But that's not the point of this thread ;-)

Bye Fridger


I know. But I still want to get hold of it - is it at your texture foundry?
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system

ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Re: 8953 Moon Locations from USGS updated database

Post #5by ElChristou » 22.12.2005, 01:32

t00fri wrote:....Once more, this is a Celestia related application of (PERL) scripts, hey ElChristou ;-)
Bye Fridger


RRRrrrr!! :wink:
Nice work and another tx for it.

Bye.
Image

buggs_moran
Posts: 835
Joined: 27.09.2004
With us: 20 years 1 month
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Post #6by buggs_moran » 22.12.2005, 02:03

Very cool Fridger!! 8) However, you are destroying my math student's beliefs that math is not used in the real world and especially not for leisurely endeavours... Histograms, distributions, log fuctions used to make linear equations. Indeed man, have you lost your mind. :wink:
Homebrew:
WinXP Pro SP2
Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe
AMD Athlon XP 3000/333 2.16 GHz
1 GB Crucial RAM
80 GB WD SATA drive
ATI AIW 9600XT 128M

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 7 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #7by t00fri » 22.12.2005, 09:11

buggs_moran wrote:...
Histograms, distributions, log fuctions used to make linear equations.

That I didn't understand...(there are no linear equations involved in the statistical part)

Indeed man, have you lost your mind. :wink:


That I did understand ;-)

Bye Fridger

abramson
Posts: 408
Joined: 22.07.2003
With us: 21 years 4 months
Location: Bariloche, Argentina

Re: 8953 Moon Locations from USGS updated database

Post #8by abramson » 22.12.2005, 13:02

t00fri wrote:The striking feature is the almost perfect Normal distribution (Gaussian) of the log(size) of the craters around an average crater size of ~15.8 km

It comes from the depths of my mind that a process of random breakage or fragmentation produces a lognormal distribution of fragment sizes. This seems to apply both to artificial processes (processing of ores) and natural ones (asteroids). From the distribution of asteroid sizes there seems to follow a similar one for craters. If I am not mistaken, the original model is due to Kolmogorov.

Cheers,

Guillermo

buggs_moran
Posts: 835
Joined: 27.09.2004
With us: 20 years 1 month
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Post #9by buggs_moran » 22.12.2005, 15:18

t00fri wrote:
buggs_moran wrote:...
Histograms, distributions, log fuctions used to make linear equations.

That I didn't understand...(there are no linear equations involved in the statistical part)

Bye Fridger


My bad Fridger. I went back and reread your worksheet. I had only given it a cursory glance last night (bad habits). I should know better. I see that the linear function of importance v. distance has nothing to do with the statistical ditribution... :oops:
Homebrew:

WinXP Pro SP2

Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe

AMD Athlon XP 3000/333 2.16 GHz

1 GB Crucial RAM

80 GB WD SATA drive

ATI AIW 9600XT 128M

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 7 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #10by t00fri » 22.12.2005, 23:24

Here is some further fun stuff related to the Moon.

I managed to FINALLY locate some true topographical
elevation data of the Moon
with reasonably high
resolution from USGS. They are not so widely known since
they are in RAW grayscale format, both in 8bit and even in
16bit, such that a noise-less normal map can be made as
well (using Chris' nm16 code).



So I made a true 2k bump map file for the moon by
combining Celementine topography data (0.25x0.25 degree
resolution) with higher resolution elevation data for the
north and south pole regions. After eliminating many
artifacts, the result gives a qualitatively new perspective of
the Moon, based on my 8k main Moon texture.

Here is a taste of it:

Image
Image
Image

Bye Fridger
Last edited by t00fri on 22.12.2005, 23:29, edited 1 time in total.

danielj
Posts: 1477
Joined: 15.08.2003
With us: 21 years 3 months

Post #11by danielj » 23.12.2005, 00:00

Both of them are very nice,but when they will be available to download?

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 7 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #12by t00fri » 23.12.2005, 00:30

danielj wrote:Both of them are very nice,but when they will be available to download?


When I am entirely satisfied with them ;-)

Bye Fridger

ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Post #13by ElChristou » 23.12.2005, 02:27

Very nice indeed!!! :P
Lately I was thinking the Moon maps I'm using are really not fantastics...
I think I have found something better!! :wink:
Image

calder
Posts: 21
Joined: 23.12.2005
With us: 18 years 11 months
Location: Australia

Post #14by calder » 23.12.2005, 05:38

Stunning work Fridger,

I'm sure I'll find the names to a lot more craters I see after I look through my telescope at night, using this package. 8)


Return to “Celestia Users”