more colorful galaxies

General discussion about Celestia that doesn't fit into other forums.
Topic author
billybob884
Posts: 986
Joined: 16.08.2002
With us: 22 years 3 months
Location: USA, East Coast

more colorful galaxies

Post #1by billybob884 » 15.09.2002, 01:10

I konw this has been mentioned in other posts, but i couldn't seem to find it. i found a few pics incase anyone wants them.
Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Enough?

And one more suggestion, maybe there should be a little more "bulk" to the center of the galexy, like so:
Image
Mike M.

TacoTopia!

Redfish
Posts: 185
Joined: 22.05.2002
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: Lat: 50.850 Long: 5.683 | Maastricht Netherlands
Contact:

Post #2by Redfish » 15.09.2002, 16:24

I agree,
why cant galaxies have some more color. It seems realistic that when the number of stars becomes higher, that a certain change in color will occur around the center of the galaxy. I don't think changing the colors for the models is too hard to accomplish.

Don't forget though, that the colors you see on those photographs are caused by the film they used, so in reality they might not be so blue and orange.

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 3 months
Location: NY, USA

Post #3by selden » 15.09.2002, 16:39

"Might not"? ;)

Most astronomical color photographs are "false color". They're either combinations of limited-bandwidth black-and-white photographs done to bring out the fetures that are being studied, or they've been enhanced for their entertainment value. Visually, the colors are much more subdued.

Of course, it'd be nice if Celestia provided a choice of presentation formats: visually accurate, enhanced for studying features and enhanced for entertainment.
Selden

Rassilon
Posts: 1887
Joined: 29.01.2002
With us: 22 years 10 months
Location: Altair

Post #4by Rassilon » 15.09.2002, 17:36

The stars and Nebulae make up the galaxies color....I bet as soon as chris gets around to adding the possibility of more stars we will see a better more illuminated galaxy....Problem is it wont be seen for a while I bet....And well I suppose hes also tired of my constant prodding so I wont be asking him too :mrgreen:
I'm trying to teach the cavemen how to play scrabble, its uphill work. The only word they know is Uhh and they dont know how to spell it!

Topic author
billybob884
Posts: 986
Joined: 16.08.2002
With us: 22 years 3 months
Location: USA, East Coast

more...

Post #5by billybob884 » 20.11.2002, 23:23

found a few more pics, and there of specific galaxies:
Image
Image
NGC 4945:
Image
NGC 4013:
Image
NGC 1512:
Image
NGC 4650A:
Image
NGC 253:
Image
Mike M.



TacoTopia!

Darkmiss
Posts: 1059
Joined: 20.08.2002
With us: 22 years 3 months
Location: London, England

Post #6by Darkmiss » 21.11.2002, 01:14

I have a question ?

In the photo of our galaxy (the one with "you are here" on it)
If that is our galaxy, and the furthest space probe we have out is Voyager.

How did we get that picture ?

Please don't flame me too hard, if this is a very silly question.
I honestly don't know.

Image
CPU- Intel Pentium Core 2 Quad ,2.40GHz
RAM- 2Gb 1066MHz DDR2
Motherboard- Gigabyte P35 DQ6
Video Card- Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS + 640Mb
Hard Drives- 2 SATA Raptor 10000rpm 150GB
OS- Windows Vista Home Premium 32

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 3 months
Location: NY, USA

Post #7by selden » 21.11.2002, 02:01

Paul,

They just picked an HST picture of another galaxy (NGC4414) that looks something like what they thought our galaxy looks like.

See http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990609.html

I hope this clarifies things a little.
Selden

Darkmiss
Posts: 1059
Joined: 20.08.2002
With us: 22 years 3 months
Location: London, England

Post #8by Darkmiss » 21.11.2002, 02:18

Ah thanks
So its not an actual picture of our galaxy. :roll:
CPU- Intel Pentium Core 2 Quad ,2.40GHz

RAM- 2Gb 1066MHz DDR2

Motherboard- Gigabyte P35 DQ6

Video Card- Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS + 640Mb

Hard Drives- 2 SATA Raptor 10000rpm 150GB

OS- Windows Vista Home Premium 32

Rassilon
Posts: 1887
Joined: 29.01.2002
With us: 22 years 10 months
Location: Altair

Post #9by Rassilon » 21.11.2002, 02:55

Yeah it is actually...Its the new hyperspace enabled space probe Voyager 13 snapshot...No wait im in the 21st century...nevermind...
I'm trying to teach the cavemen how to play scrabble, its uphill work. The only word they know is Uhh and they dont know how to spell it!

Avatar
John Van Vliet
Posts: 2944
Joined: 28.08.2002
With us: 22 years 3 months

The milkiway

Post #10by John Van Vliet » 22.11.2002, 23:51

The Enterprise got it when they left our gallexy

Avatar
John Van Vliet
Posts: 2944
Joined: 28.08.2002
With us: 22 years 3 months

The milkiway

Post #11by John Van Vliet » 22.11.2002, 23:52

The Enterprise got it when they left our galaxy

Redfish
Posts: 185
Joined: 22.05.2002
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: Lat: 50.850 Long: 5.683 | Maastricht Netherlands
Contact:

Post #12by Redfish » 23.11.2002, 14:04

Heheh lol, no of course it's a different galaxy. We only have pictures of the galaxy taken from our location, so we can see the galaxy from the inside, you'd see a long band of stars with a blob somewhere around the middle. Nothing more. :) Also in celestia you know that you'd have to travel around 100,000 LY to see the galaxy as a whole. And the fact that we cannot even reacht the nearest star at under 4 ly says it all, i think.

Guest

Post #13by Guest » 24.11.2002, 22:49

When we make contact with aliens, that's the first thing I would ask for: their all-sky survey data. That way, I could get the darn galaxy positons right in galaxies.dat! :lol:

Cheers,
Paul

Don. Edwards
Posts: 1510
Joined: 07.09.2002
Age: 59
With us: 22 years 3 months
Location: Albany, Oregon

Post #14by Don. Edwards » 25.11.2002, 02:03

The other problem with that picture representing our galaxy is its the wrong type. That picture is of a standard spiral galaxy. Most astronomers are comming to the conclustion that our galaxy is a bared spiral instead. Which makes it one of the most intreguing types.
Image
I am officially a retired member.
I might answer a PM or a post if its relevant to something.

Ah, never say never!!
Past texture releases, Hmm let me think about it

Thanks for your understanding.

MKruer
Posts: 501
Joined: 18.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months

Post #15by MKruer » 25.11.2002, 10:04

I head the same thing a wile back, unfortunately, most scientist still believe that the galaxy still has four arms to it, and that it only a slight bar, so the milky way ends up being somewhere between a bar and a spiral galaxy. I guess if you want to visualize it you would have two arms come to the same point in the spiral for one end of the bar. The may be an easy explanation for this event. The galaxy actually has two major black holes at the center, one major super massive back hole at the center, and another minor super black hole that orbits the larger one. This would cause a tidal effect to pull the matter in the arms into a bar. Sort of like the tidal effect of the moon on earths oceans. Weird huh?

Guest

Post #16by Guest » 25.11.2002, 11:02

Some of the astronomy picutres got false colours, actually, all colour picutres are taken in grayscale, and then added colours.
But most of these picutres is true colour, this goes for most picutres of galaxies and nebulas. True colour means the colour is like the one you would see if you where on an actual spaceship, viewing the galaxy with your own eyes.

So yes, it would be great if Celestia could have better and more realistic galaxy render system. 8)


Stargazer.


Return to “Celestia Users”