stars.dat ver 1.20

Report bugs, bug fixes and workarounds here.
Avatar
Topic author
HB M
Posts: 132
Joined: 26.11.2002
With us: 22 years
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands

stars.dat ver 1.20

Post #1by HB » 22.09.2004, 10:42

The new stars.dat version 1.20 doesn't work. Perhaps a few bytes to much by stellarclass from some stars?

Hans

Added later:

Yes, and I have build Celestia compiled from the latest CVS files.
HB

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months
Location: NY, USA

Post #2by selden » 22.09.2004, 12:23

"it works fine for me"

I just now used anonymous CVS to download the entire celestia directory tree from scratch (I did not do a partial update nor did I try to use the nightly tarball) and rebuilt Celestia under Windows XP with VisualStudio 2003 using makerelease.bat. Celestia started and displayed stars with no relevant error messages.

The console log (~) said

112524 stars in database
Loaded cross index data/hdxindex.dat
Loaded cross index data/saoxindex.dat

complained about the exoplanets with no primaries
loaded many ssc files
and solar system surface textures.


There are, umm, problems when trying to view a star close up, but I know Chris is in the middle of modifying that code. (Celestia draws an irregular white 3D shape inside a glowing photosphere.)
Selden

chris
Site Admin
Posts: 4211
Joined: 28.01.2002
With us: 22 years 9 months
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA

Post #3by chris » 22.09.2004, 14:59

selden wrote:There are, umm, problems when trying to view a star close up, but I know Chris is in the middle of modifying that code. (Celestia draws an irregular white 3D shape inside a glowing photosphere.)


Curious indeed. I only see that when I specify a mesh for a star. Could you share a screenshot?

--Chris

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months
Location: NY, USA

Post #4by selden » 22.09.2004, 15:20

Not until this evening, ~7 hours from now. Sorry.

(I'm not set up to build Celestia at work.)

fwiw, there were no error messages in the console log. I think it *might* have looked like Phobos, but I'm not sure. Phobos happened to be the last object loaded, according to the console log.

I first noticed it when I did a GoTo of a random star, just to make sure stars.dat was loading properly. Then I typed H G (GoTo Sun) and saw it there.
Selden

Christophe
Developer
Posts: 944
Joined: 18.07.2002
With us: 22 years 4 months
Location: Lyon (France)

Post #5by Christophe » 22.09.2004, 20:47

It _is_ Phobos:

Image
Christophe

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months
Location: NY, USA

Post #6by selden » 22.09.2004, 20:54

Yup. That's what I saw, too.
Selden

Avatar
Topic author
HB M
Posts: 132
Joined: 26.11.2002
With us: 22 years
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Some other things about stars.dat

Post #7by HB » 23.09.2004, 06:33

Selden you'r right again.It seem's I've got a download or ZIP-problem.
After download again its working ok.
But it seems dat when dumping the stars.dat to a text file some of the StellarClass info isn't complete. By some of the star a "V" is missing. I didn't check it completly to find other missing items.

Another problem arose as wel.The latest tool, Makestardb v1.3, is complaining about linking problems during compilation. Something about textures and image. It become quite late to sort out this problem in more details.

Hans.
HB

granthutchison
Developer
Posts: 1863
Joined: 21.11.2002
With us: 22 years

Re: Some other things about stars.dat

Post #8by granthutchison » 23.09.2004, 07:30

HB wrote:But it seems dat when dumping the stars.dat to a text file some of the StellarClass info isn't complete. By some of the star a "V" is missing.
There are many missing data in the original Hipparcos catalogue. Celestia used to assign a luminosity class of "V" if no luminosity class was given, but this was often wrong.

Grant

chris
Site Admin
Posts: 4211
Joined: 28.01.2002
With us: 22 years 9 months
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA

Post #9by chris » 23.09.2004, 15:32

Christophe wrote:It _is_ Phobos:

Image


It should be fixed in the latest CVS build. The problem arose because the model wasn't initialized to InvalidResource in a constructor. I also changed the rendering code so the photosphere isn't shown for stars with meshes.

--Chris

chris
Site Admin
Posts: 4211
Joined: 28.01.2002
With us: 22 years 9 months
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA

Re: Some other things about stars.dat

Post #10by chris » 23.09.2004, 15:33

HB wrote:Another problem arose as wel.The latest tool, Makestardb v1.3, is complaining about linking problems during compilation. Something about textures and image. It become quite late to sort out this problem in more details.

I just checked in a fix for this. You should be able to build makestardb again.

--Chris


Return to “Bugs”