M20, the Trifid Nebula

Post requests, images, descriptions and reports about work in progress here.
Topic author
praesepe
Posts: 220
Joined: 15.10.2002
Age: 44
With us: 22 years 4 months
Location: Barcelona, Spain

M20, the Trifid Nebula

Post #1by praesepe » 12.06.2003, 22:47

Hi,

After a little pause, this is my new add-on project: the trifid nebula or M20. These are early screenshots, since there's a lot of work to do on the main texture (a 2048x2048 tiff file in which I had to remove LOTS of stars, sigh). I've got the RA and DEC values but having trouble with the dsitances. The different sources suggest distances from 2200 to 9000 ly :?

P.S.: As usual, all stars there are rendered by Celestia.

Image
Image
Image
Greets :P

praesepe

Darkmiss
Posts: 1059
Joined: 20.08.2002
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: London, England

Post #2by Darkmiss » 13.06.2003, 01:10

Very nice work
looks good enough to go.

Also i have noticed in a lot of peoples screen shots, that they do not use the "stars as pionts" selection in the Celestia options
Why is this?

which one would be the correct view (for realism) on or off?
Or is stars as points (off) just for slower machines ?
CPU- Intel Pentium Core 2 Quad ,2.40GHz
RAM- 2Gb 1066MHz DDR2
Motherboard- Gigabyte P35 DQ6
Video Card- Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS + 640Mb
Hard Drives- 2 SATA Raptor 10000rpm 150GB
OS- Windows Vista Home Premium 32

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 5 months
Location: NY, USA

Post #3by selden » 13.06.2003, 02:22

Paul,

CRTs and LCDs don't have the dynamic range in brightness to be able to show astronomical objects at realistic intensities. At least with the normal stars setting (not as points) there's some variation in their apparent brightness, although nowhere near as much as there would be with an ideal display device.

I've found "stars as points" to be useful when trying to align things, but in general I think that setting is most useful in improving performance when the variations in brightness don't matter.

For what it's worth, I think it'd be nice if Celestia supported a much wider range of intensities for stars, even though it would have to do it by giving them much larger diameters.

Partiview does it, why can't Celestia???
;)

Note I said it'd be nice, not that it's important so far as I'm concerned. Others may feel differently, of course.
Selden

billybob884
Posts: 986
Joined: 16.08.2002
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: USA, East Coast

Post #4by billybob884 » 17.06.2003, 21:47

increbible! keep up the good work praesepe!
Mike M.

TacoTopia!

billybob884
Posts: 986
Joined: 16.08.2002
With us: 22 years 6 months
Location: USA, East Coast

Post #5by billybob884 » 24.06.2003, 01:36

its been a while, hows it coming?
Mike M.



TacoTopia!

Topic author
praesepe
Posts: 220
Joined: 15.10.2002
Age: 44
With us: 22 years 4 months
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Post #6by praesepe » 30.06.2003, 15:46

I know... but because of an HD failure I've lost part of my work, so I'll have to start again :( At least I've got a copy of the original tiff image (2048x2048) halfways worked so I won't have to restart from 0 :wink:

Now I am going out for holydays for about 15 days or so, so I'm gonna leave the forums those days... but I will return, I promise! hehe
Greets :P

praesepe


Return to “Add-on development”