whoajohn71 wrote:Aurora borealis:
is that ssc or sprite effects?
look in this thread for my methone texture and a real data methane texture from professional scientists, its way better then what you have, it resembles the photos betterjohn71 wrote:Methone:
Code: Select all
SemiAxes [ 2 1.7 1.2 ]
Code: Select all
EllipticalOrbit
{
Epoch 2453177.5 # 2004 Jun 21
Period 1.00971
SemiMajorAxis 194251
Eccentricity 0.001
Inclination 0.018
AscendingNode 311.0
ArgOfPericenter 308.0
MeanLongitude 154.79
}
UniformRotation
{
MeridianAngle -25.21
Epoch 2453177.5 # 2004 Jun 21
}
}
No. Methone's orbit in CO is much more accurate.trappistplanets wrote:moons-regular.ssc witch i think is from Celestia Origin
Code: Select all
"Methone:Saturn XXXII:S-2004 S 1" "Sol/Saturn"
{
Class "minormoon"
Texture "lightasteroid-smooth.dds"
SemiAxes [ 1.94 1.29 1.21 ]
OrbitFrame
{
EclipticJ2000 { Center "Sol/Saturn" }
}
EllipticalOrbit
{
Epoch 2456067.5 # 2012 May 20
Period 1.009573975
SemiMajorAxis 194440
Eccentricity 0.0001
Inclination 28.060787
AscendingNode 169.547233
ArgOfPericenter 346.235329
MeanAnomaly 16.189134
}
UniformRotation
{
Epoch 2453177.5 # 2004 Jun 21
MeridianAngle 335
}
LunarLambert 0.5
Albedo 0.7
InfoURL "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methone_(moon)"
}
okay, what about rotation?Art Blos wrote:No. Methone's orbit in CO is much more accurate.
it doen't look like it to me, methone is not a object with random purple spots+ methone has some featers that look like cracksjohn71 wrote:It IS the photo.
i see some very visible albedo featuresjohn71 wrote:That's all the information I can get from the picture: