New bugfix release 1.6.2-beta1
- Anthony_B_Russo10
- Moderator
- Posts: 672
- Joined: 03.07.2018
- Age: 21
- With us: 6 years 5 months
- Location: Tallahassee, Florida, US
The resulting error of forcing 1.6.2 to work under Mac OS X 10.6.8 by editing its plist file.
Anthony B. Russo, I like Pluto. Mod of the Celestia subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Celestiasoftware/
I have over 40 computers, trying to list them here would be a pain.
Responsible for the NEO catalog: https://celestiaproject.space/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=22203
And mod of the Discord server.
I have over 40 computers, trying to list them here would be a pain.
Responsible for the NEO catalog: https://celestiaproject.space/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=22203
And mod of the Discord server.
-
- Developer
- Posts: 274
- Joined: 29.01.2009
- Age: 29
- With us: 15 years 10 months
- Location: Suzhou, China
Anthony_B_Russo10 wrote:The resulting error of forcing 1.6.2 to work under Mac OS X 10.6.8 by editing its plist file.
error.jpg
Minimum support is 10.7, it is almost impossible to ship one binary with current development tool to support both below 10.7 and above 10.7 since there is major C++ library support change in 10.7.
CMOD Specularity Bug in 1.6.2
CMOD Specularity Bug in 1.6.2
If a specularmap image file is specified in a CMOD model, that image is ignored by v1.6.2 (and by v1.6.1). It works in v1.7.0. It'd be nice if the fix could be backported to v1.6.2.
The attached Addon provides an ASCII CMOD model (models/planet.cmod) and surface texture images in textures/medres (planet.jpg and planet-spec.jpg) which demonstrate this bug.
The accompanying cmod-spec-bug.html provides a CEL:// URL which takes you to a viewpoint which demonstrates this bug: The entire surface of the front facet of the "planet" is incorrectly drawn as bright white when viewed in v1.6.2, but when viewed in v1.7.0, the "land" areas are correctly not reflective.
The attached framegrabs cmod-spec-bug_1.6.2.png and cmod-spec-bug_1.7.0.png show these results.
(756 KB expands to 774 KB)
If a specularmap image file is specified in a CMOD model, that image is ignored by v1.6.2 (and by v1.6.1). It works in v1.7.0. It'd be nice if the fix could be backported to v1.6.2.
The attached Addon provides an ASCII CMOD model (models/planet.cmod) and surface texture images in textures/medres (planet.jpg and planet-spec.jpg) which demonstrate this bug.
The accompanying cmod-spec-bug.html provides a CEL:// URL which takes you to a viewpoint which demonstrates this bug: The entire surface of the front facet of the "planet" is incorrectly drawn as bright white when viewed in v1.6.2, but when viewed in v1.7.0, the "land" areas are correctly not reflective.
The attached framegrabs cmod-spec-bug_1.6.2.png and cmod-spec-bug_1.7.0.png show these results.
(756 KB expands to 774 KB)
Selden
-
Topic authoronetwothree
- Site Admin
- Posts: 706
- Joined: 22.09.2018
- With us: 6 years 2 months
-
Topic authoronetwothree
- Site Admin
- Posts: 706
- Joined: 22.09.2018
- With us: 6 years 2 months
- Anthony_B_Russo10
- Moderator
- Posts: 672
- Joined: 03.07.2018
- Age: 21
- With us: 6 years 5 months
- Location: Tallahassee, Florida, US
Seven, please upload these to files to the archive repository.
Anthony B. Russo, I like Pluto. Mod of the Celestia subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Celestiasoftware/
I have over 40 computers, trying to list them here would be a pain.
Responsible for the NEO catalog: https://celestiaproject.space/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=22203
And mod of the Discord server.
I have over 40 computers, trying to list them here would be a pain.
Responsible for the NEO catalog: https://celestiaproject.space/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=22203
And mod of the Discord server.
-
Topic authoronetwothree
- Site Admin
- Posts: 706
- Joined: 22.09.2018
- With us: 6 years 2 months
- SevenSpheres
- Moderator
- Posts: 826
- Joined: 08.10.2019
- With us: 5 years 1 month
Anthony_B_Russo10 wrote:Seven, please upload these to files to the archive repository.
No, these are test builds. I don't upload the 1.7.0 testing builds there.
onetwothree: are there files with the extended locations to test with?
My Addons: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=19978 • Discord server admin
Celestia versions: 1.5.1, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.7.0, and some unofficial versions like Celestia-ED
Celestia versions: 1.5.1, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.7.0, and some unofficial versions like Celestia-ED
-
Topic authoronetwothree
- Site Admin
- Posts: 706
- Joined: 22.09.2018
- With us: 6 years 2 months
- SevenSpheres
- Moderator
- Posts: 826
- Joined: 08.10.2019
- With us: 5 years 1 month
Just tested, doesn't work.
Stock 1.6.2-beta2 with locations enabled:
Test build from this thread + ring_locs.ssc from CelestiaContent, with locations enabled:
IMO backporting the new location types to 1.6.2 isn't necessary; all that needs to be done now is to update the changelog, update the "INSTALLING IN UNIX AND LINUX" section of the readme file, update data (I need to get around to doing that), and possibly fix this bug.
Stock 1.6.2-beta2 with locations enabled:
Test build from this thread + ring_locs.ssc from CelestiaContent, with locations enabled:
IMO backporting the new location types to 1.6.2 isn't necessary; all that needs to be done now is to update the changelog, update the "INSTALLING IN UNIX AND LINUX" section of the readme file, update data (I need to get around to doing that), and possibly fix this bug.
My Addons: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=19978 • Discord server admin
Celestia versions: 1.5.1, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.7.0, and some unofficial versions like Celestia-ED
Celestia versions: 1.5.1, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.7.0, and some unofficial versions like Celestia-ED
-
Topic authoronetwothree
- Site Admin
- Posts: 706
- Joined: 22.09.2018
- With us: 6 years 2 months
-
Topic authoronetwothree
- Site Admin
- Posts: 706
- Joined: 22.09.2018
- With us: 6 years 2 months
- gironde
- Posts: 851
- Joined: 16.12.2016
- Age: 72
- With us: 7 years 11 months
- Location: Montigny-Les-Metz, France
Is there a difference between lua5.1.dll in celestia 1.6.1 (172ko for mine) and lua51.dll (683ko) in celestia 1.6.2.
Curiously, the results with Lua Universal Tools are not the same. (with the same files)
celestia 1.6.1 or EP V3
celestia 1.6.2
The box elevators are gone.
Why such a size difference between the 2 dll files ?
Curiously, the results with Lua Universal Tools are not the same. (with the same files)
celestia 1.6.1 or EP V3
celestia 1.6.2
The box elevators are gone.
Why such a size difference between the 2 dll files ?
-
Topic authoronetwothree
- Site Admin
- Posts: 706
- Joined: 22.09.2018
- With us: 6 years 2 months
In 1.6.2 I use luajit instead of plain lua 5.1. It's faster.
Your issue with scroll bars is very interesting, I don't think it's caused by lua51.dll, something else is to blame.
Added after 15 minutes 30 seconds:
You can replace lua51.dll in 1.6.2 using the version from 1.6.1 and check if you have scrollbars.
Added after 12 minutes 18 seconds:
Checked both LUA implementations - no difference.
Your issue with scroll bars is very interesting, I don't think it's caused by lua51.dll, something else is to blame.
Added after 15 minutes 30 seconds:
You can replace lua51.dll in 1.6.2 using the version from 1.6.1 and check if you have scrollbars.
Added after 12 minutes 18 seconds:
Checked both LUA implementations - no difference.