Nemesis

[duds26]

Wasn't this red dwarf star and it's moons returning in a period of 3900years and thus comming in 22xx sometime?

If you look at the times in the Nibiru legend, the orbit doesn't fit with 2012.
They come back somewhere in 22xx.

[freiza667]

nibiru? is that planet x?

Andy-Lloyd-Dark-Star-Image-IX.jpg

[freiza667]

wow is nibiru Nemesis?

[freiza667]

well is nibiru plenet x or a new planet?

[freiza667]

Wasn't this red dwarf star and it's moons returning in a period of 3900years and thus comming in 22xx sometime?

If you look at the times in the Nibiru legend, the orbit doesn't fit with 2012.
They come back somewhere in 22xx.

2012? what that planet is the domsday of 2012?

[Hungry4info]

well is nibiru plenet x or a new planet?

Neither. Anyone knowledgable in astronomy will gladly tell you that. Quite simply...

Nibiru does not exist.

[freiza667]

well planet x do loke to be Nemesis (not nibiru)
tay ar 1: the same size

2: same place

3: Source of long period comets

4: tay ar hypothesis to explain a perceived cycle of mass extinctions in the geological record

5: highly elliptical orbit

6: tay ar to explain apparent discrepancies in the orbits of the gas giants, particularly Uranus and Neptune

[Mneme]

Harrington died in January 1993, without having found Planet X.[36] Six months before, Myles Standish had used data from Voyager 2's 1989 flyby of Neptune, which had revised the planet's total mass downward by 0.5%—an amount comparable to the mass of Mars[36]—to recalculate its gravitational effect on Uranus.[37] When Neptune's newly determined mass was used in the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Developmental Ephemeris (JPL DE), the supposed discrepancies in the Uranian orbit, and with them the need for a Planet X, vanished.[3] Moreover, there are no discrepancies in the trajectories of any space probes such as Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 that can be attributed to the gravitational pull of a large undiscovered object in the outer Solar System.[38] Today, most astronomers agree that Planet X, as Lowell defined it, does not exist.[39]

[Hungry4info]

well planet x do loke to be Nemesis (not nibiru)
tay ar 1: the same size

"Planet X" is a name for a hypothetical body in the Oort cloud. There is no actual candidate for a planet x, and nothing like it has been found. And since there is no emperical evidence for Nemesis, nor has there been any "Planet X" found, a comparison of their size is pure conjecture.

2: same place

You know where it is?

3: Source of long period comets

This can be explained with other means as well.

4: tay ar hypothesis to explain a perceived cycle of mass extinctions in the geological record

These can be explained with other means as well.

5: highly elliptical orbit

Since neither "planet x" or Nemesis have been found (and indeed, no evidence to suggest they exist), we have no idea what its orbit is like. You seem to be suggesting that either of these two are on an eccentric orbit and make regular incursions into the solar system, bringing mass extinction events. There is no evidence for such a body. If Nemesis exists, it must have an orbit that does not take it within our solar system, or else the planets would have been scattered. If Planet X exists, it must have an orbit that does not bring it near the other planets, else it would have been scattered or ejected from the solar system.

6: tay ar to explain apparent discrepancies in the orbits of the gas giants, particularly Uranus and Neptune

There are no discrepancies in the orbits of the gas giants or Uranus and Neptune.

In summary, there is no object that comes into our solar system, causing regular mass extinctions (i.e. a Nibiru-type object).

[Spaceman]

Thanks to freiza667, Nemesis looks much better

nemesis.jpg

I also add new planets to the system

nemesis2.jpg

Lovely, isn't

nemesis3.jpg

[Hungry4info]

Because it has application to previous discussion in this thread...

It's recently circulated in the news that "Nemesis" can be ruled out as the cause of the extinction events. The paper has appeared on ArXiv today.

Nemesis Reconsidered
http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.3153

Most notably

The regularity of the timing compared with earlier calculations of orbital perturbation would seem to exclude the Nemesis hypothesis as a causal factor.

[freiza667]

also in the Sailor Moon series, there exists a tenth Planet called Nemesis which is controlled by the villains of the Black Moon Clan. The planet is said to be radiating negative energy and can disappear from sight, only trackable via X-rays

and in In the Dragon ball series, there's a tenth Planet or a brown dwarf called Nemesis or the Makyo Star every 12,000 years, it passes close to Earth which power all the Makyo demons inhabiting Earth.

wow and both show's ar old and the Nemesis in dragon ball i have picks of it

PDVD_141nemesis.JPG

and here my pick of it

nemesis.jpg

the pick that i made but from the show

nemesis 2.JPG