There's a nice comparison in Google Earth there :
http://www.barnabu.co.uk/page/7/
Nice moons comparison in GE
-
Topic authorCham
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: 14.01.2004
- Age: 60
- With us: 20 years 10 months
- Location: Montreal
Nice moons comparison in GE
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"
-
Topic authorCham
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: 14.01.2004
- Age: 60
- With us: 20 years 10 months
- Location: Montreal
Re: Nice moons comparison in GE
I'm now a bit worrying about Celestia vs Google Earth. GE is growing so fast, and its features set is now so impressive. Its community (and add-ons) is now extremelly large compared with Celestia's. Any thoughts on this ?
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"
-
- Developer
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: 04.02.2005
- With us: 19 years 9 months
Re: Nice moons comparison in GE
Why should Celestia try to compete with GoogleEarth? Celestia is intended to be an astronomical visualization tool, not a GIS tool.
It would be nice if Celestia could make use of some of the databases used by GoogleEarth, though, so people don't have to re-invent them.
It would be nice if Celestia could make use of some of the databases used by GoogleEarth, though, so people don't have to re-invent them.
Selden
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4211
- Joined: 28.01.2002
- With us: 22 years 10 months
- Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Re: Nice moons comparison in GE
Exactly.selden wrote:Why should Celestia try to compete with GoogleEarth? Celestia is intended to be an astronomical visualization tool, not a GIS tool.
It would be nice if Celestia could make use of some of the databases used by GoogleEarth, though, so people don't have to re-invent them.
I've looked at Google Earth's KML file format a little bit. It would be quite a lot of work to support everything in KML files, but not overwhelmingly difficult to support some key features. Partial support for KML files could generate a lot of frustration when some certain features didn't work; choosing a concisely describable subset of features might mitigate this problem (e.g. "Placemarks are the only KML entities recognized.)
An important feature of Google Earth is that it's very simple to install add-ons: you just click on a kmz file and it appears in the list of installed items. It should be this easy to install an add-on in Celestia, too.
--Chris
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: 12.10.2007
- With us: 17 years 1 month
Re: Nice moons comparison in GE
Although GE looks impressive, as far as I know, it still does not allow one to view almost any object in the Universe...
How can there be any comparison?
How can there be any comparison?
Brain-Dead Geezer Bob is now using...
Windows Vista Home Premium, 64-bit on a
Gateway Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5200, 2.5GHz
7 GB RAM, 500 GB hard disk, Nvidia GeForce 7100
Nvidia nForce 630i, 1680x1050 screen, Latest SVN
Windows Vista Home Premium, 64-bit on a
Gateway Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5200, 2.5GHz
7 GB RAM, 500 GB hard disk, Nvidia GeForce 7100
Nvidia nForce 630i, 1680x1050 screen, Latest SVN
- t00fri
- Developer
- Posts: 8772
- Joined: 29.03.2002
- Age: 22
- With us: 22 years 7 months
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
Re: Nice moons comparison in GE
selden wrote:Why should Celestia try to compete with GoogleEarth? Celestia is intended to be an astronomical visualization tool, not a GIS tool.
....
Selden,
strictly speaking, you are correct of course. Yet in a more general context, there are a number of features that are up for comparison: like the ease and handling of 3d navigation, the smoothness of generating 3d terrain on the fly, patching textures quickly together etc. Altogether I could enumerate a number of features in GE that would make a VERY good show in Celestia and make me a little envious...
Fridger
-
- Developer
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: 04.02.2005
- With us: 19 years 9 months
Re: Nice moons comparison in GE
t00fri wrote:...there are a number of features that are up for comparison: like the ease and handling of 3d navigation...
Any interest in discussing this point in a specific thread for eventually work on some modif of Celestia?
Re: Nice moons comparison in GE
I don?t like GE very much.It?s very unstable in my configuration.I put a certain number of models and then the program lock down.If I desinstall,reinstall,but not uninstall the models,the problem remains.It?s very annoying...