Is Amalthea considered a minor moon?

General discussion about Celestia that doesn't fit into other forums.
Avatar
Topic author
cartrite
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.09.2005
With us: 19 years
Location: Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA Greate Grandfother from Irshava, Zakarpattia Oblast Ukraine

Re: Is Amalthea considered a minor moon?

Post #21by cartrite » 17.04.2008, 16:26

ElChristou wrote:
cartrite wrote:
ElChristou wrote:But Chris, are you ready to implement an official download page? Even if it's only for a file, IMHO you should open it, else we will never begin those official packages (textures or data) we have been talking about from time to time...
Shouldn't the executable that Phoenix or myself provide run in the svn celestia folder that wasn't built if it also had the dll's or whatever MAC needs to run? That's an official way to keep the users updated that can't build. Downloading with a SVN client is simple enough.
cartrite

:oops: I fear you lost me a bit here... I 'm not sure to understand what you mean exactly, but concerning those eventual official addons, the idea was to release Celestia as always and have some officially supported data set or textures. The files could stay in SVN, it's just a question of creating the catalogue page at shatters. In the present case, instead of having ALL minormoons in the default package, you will have only a few ones and up to each users to extend his data base downloading the files and placing them in the extras...
I mean if a user used a SVN client like Tortoise SVN, they could get all the data and texture files that are in SVN "currently official?" and use an executable to run the program. Even the "pre" packages for Windows only contain what is in the celestia.iss file. I think some texture files are left out. Not sure.

I was unaware of plans to create a download page. That would give a user a choice of what to include in their installation. Probably a better idea but it requires extra work.
cartrite
VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Intel(R) UHD Graphics 8gb ram. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 CPU @ 1.00GHz, 1190 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s) 8 GB ram. Running on Windows 11 and OpenSuse 15.4

chris
Site Admin
Posts: 4211
Joined: 28.01.2002
With us: 22 years 8 months
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA

Re: Is Amalthea considered a minor moon?

Post #22by chris » 17.04.2008, 16:29

ElChristou wrote:But Chris, are you ready to implement an official download page? Even if it's only for a file, IMHO you should open it, else we will never begin those official packages (textures or data) we have been talking about from time to time...

Sure, I can create a download page. But, I was planning on just including minormoons.ssc in the basic release. Maybe I'm not understanding something?

--Chris

ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 7 months

Re: Is Amalthea considered a minor moon?

Post #23by ElChristou » 17.04.2008, 17:33

chris wrote:Sure, I can create a download page. But, I was planning on just including minormoons.ssc in the basic release. Maybe I'm not understanding something?

Wait, then you took Andrew's idea as the bodies to be classified as moons? then the rest would go in the minormoon.ssc?
Image

revent
Posts: 80
Joined: 15.11.2003
Age: 47
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Springfield, MO, USA

Re: Is Amalthea considered a minor moon?

Post #24by revent » 18.04.2008, 02:33

I would think the logical criteria for separating 'minor' and 'major' moons would be whether or not the moon in question is massive enough that it's gravitational effects need to be considered when calculating the orbits of the other moons.

Avatar
Topic author
cartrite
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.09.2005
With us: 19 years
Location: Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA Greate Grandfother from Irshava, Zakarpattia Oblast Ukraine

Re: Is Amalthea considered a minor moon?

Post #25by cartrite » 24.04.2008, 09:09

The executables that are at my web site are at revision 4309 which is one less then the current revision of 4310. Since that last update only affects MAC, I'm going to wait till the next commit to rebuild. There will be extra changes though. I plan to remove the extras folder that contained minormoons.ssc and numberedmoons.ssc.

Chris has modified those 2 files and and 3 more .ssc files from the data folder, asteroids, outersys, and solarsys that are available here.
http://www.celestiaproject.net/~claurel/celest ... system.zip
He would welcome some feedback before they are commited to SVN.
Chris wrote:Now that the minormoon and dwarfplanet classes are implemented, here's
an update of solarsys.ssc, outersys.ssc, asteroids.ssc,
minormoons.ssc, and numberedmoons.ssc:

http://www.celestiaproject.net/~claurel/celest ... system.zip

The classes of Pluto, Eris, and Ceres were changed to dwarfplanet.
Most of the moons in minormoons.ssc and numberedmoons.ssc were demoted
to the class minormoon, with the exceptions suggested by Andrew in
this forum post:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12336&p=102873#p102873

Also, I left Nix and Hydra as major moons, simply because with just
three moons, there's no need to control clutter in the Pluto system.

I like being able to see visualize the overall character of
planet-moon systems without the clutter of dozens of minor moon
orbits. Yet I admit it still feels odd to see an object like Skathi
listed as a major moon of Saturn. Anyone else care to venture and
opinion on this not-really-so-important issue?

--Chris
Since these are subject to change, I will remove the files I modified from the executable packages I've been providing pending the next update. After they are commited to SVN, I'll put them back in and update them when changes occur to them in the future until release candidates for 1.6 become available.
cartrite
VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Intel(R) UHD Graphics 8gb ram. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 CPU @ 1.00GHz, 1190 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s) 8 GB ram. Running on Windows 11 and OpenSuse 15.4

Avatar
Topic author
cartrite
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.09.2005
With us: 19 years
Location: Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA Greate Grandfother from Irshava, Zakarpattia Oblast Ukraine

Re: Is Amalthea considered a minor moon?

Post #26by cartrite » 24.04.2008, 10:25

Something seems to be wrong here. R4309.
This first screen shot shows the label for Pluto with the dwarf planet labels on.

pluto-charon.jpg


This second shot shows the moons also. Problem is that the label for Pluto has faded away while the moon labels have not.

pluto-charon1.jpg


cartrite
Last edited by cartrite on 24.04.2008, 10:32, edited 1 time in total.
VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Intel(R) UHD Graphics 8gb ram. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 CPU @ 1.00GHz, 1190 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s) 8 GB ram. Running on Windows 11 and OpenSuse 15.4

Avatar
Topic author
cartrite
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.09.2005
With us: 19 years
Location: Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA Greate Grandfother from Irshava, Zakarpattia Oblast Ukraine

Re: Is Amalthea considered a minor moon?

Post #27by cartrite » 24.04.2008, 10:30

Here is a look at the Jupiter system. I think these look pretty good.

With the minor moons enabled.

jupiter-minormoons.jpg


With only moon labels enabled at a distance.

jupiter-moons.jpg


With moon labels enabled closer.

jupiter-moons1.jpg


cartrite
VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Intel(R) UHD Graphics 8gb ram. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 CPU @ 1.00GHz, 1190 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s) 8 GB ram. Running on Windows 11 and OpenSuse 15.4

Avatar
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 8 months
Location: Montreal

Re: Is Amalthea considered a minor moon?

Post #28by Cham » 24.04.2008, 17:48

Here are my suggestions, about the minor moons and the dwarf planets. I don't have better arguments than size, orbit oriention, and consistency.

Minor moons :
I don't see why Despina and Thebe aren't considered as major moons, considering their size and orbit orientation. And I don't see why the following aren't considered as minor moons, since they are small and have an "arbitrarily" tilted orbit :
2000J11
Albiorix
Ananke
Carme
Halimede
Narvi
Neso
Pasiphae
Sao
Siarnaq
Skathi

Dwarf planets :
In my opinion, the following objects should be considered as "dwarf planets", for consistency about their size and other aspects (most objects found in outersys.ssc) :
Ceres
2003 EL61
2004 XR190
2005 FY9
Eris
Ixion
Orcus
Quaoar
Sedna
Varuna

Of course, others may disagree with this suggestion ...
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10190
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years
Location: NY, USA

Re: Is Amalthea considered a minor moon?

Post #29by selden » 24.04.2008, 18:08

The membership of the classification "minor moons" is decided by Celestia's developers. Discussion here has a chance of affecting the list included with Celestia.

The membership of the classification "dwarf planets" is decided by the IAU. Discussion here is not likely to affect them.

Personally, I like the "ball of yarn" effect. :)
Selden


Return to “Celestia Users”