Apparent Magnitude Question

General discussion about Celestia that doesn't fit into other forums.
Topic author
Danial
Posts: 33
Joined: 31.03.2008
Age: 45
With us: 16 years 7 months
Location: Gold Coast, Australia

Apparent Magnitude Question

Post #1by Danial » 04.04.2008, 03:43

I just have a question about apparent magnitudes. From an orbit around Rigel Kentaurus A the on-screen info states that it has an app. mag. of -26.73 and the nearby B has -18.19, yet when you view the Star Browser, it lists them as -21.13 and -19.80 respectively. I was just wondering why the numbers are different?

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months
Location: NY, USA

Re: Apparent Magnitude Question

Post #2by selden » 04.04.2008, 11:08

Looks like a bug to me!
Selden

Avatar
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 7 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: Apparent Magnitude Question

Post #3by t00fri » 04.04.2008, 15:15

Danial wrote:I just have a question about apparent magnitudes. From an orbit around Rigel Kentaurus A the on-screen info states that it has an app. mag. of -26.73 and the nearby B has -18.19, yet when you view the Star Browser, it lists them as -21.13 and -19.80 respectively. I was just wondering why the numbers are different?

Unlike the Absolute magnitude the apparent magnitude is dependent on the distance of observer and light source. Did you make sure that the distances under which you looked at on the canvas and in the Celestia browser were exactly equal??

Selden wrote:Looks like a bug to me!
only if the distances were the same!


Actually, in the star browser the distance is in ly and correspondingly has a truncated 0.000 entry. The distance where the app.mag is -26.73 is only 1.2407 AU! So the distance display in the browser is certainly rather nonsensical and should switch units. There might be a truncation effect at work that is responsible for the apparent difference.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
[Edit:] That trucation of the distance in the star browser seems actually to be the problem: At a distance of 1ly, where the star browser displays at full accuracy, the two app.mag numbers are identical (-3.18) . So whoever coded this might want to make the distance display in the star browser switch units appropriately!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++


F.
Last edited by t00fri on 06.04.2008, 12:08, edited 2 times in total.
Image

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months
Location: NY, USA

Re: Apparent Magnitude Question

Post #4by selden » 04.04.2008, 15:33

They are:

Goto Rigel Kentaurus A
Open Star Browser
view AppMag in HUD: -28.40
view AppMag in Star Browser Menu: -21.38
Selden

Avatar
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 7 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: Apparent Magnitude Question

Post #5by t00fri » 04.04.2008, 15:43

selden wrote:They are:

Goto Rigel Kentaurus A
Open Star Browser
view AppMag in HUD: -28.40
view AppMag in Star Browser Menu: -21.38

I am just entering the case into the bugtracker. I am pretty sure that in the star browser the distance got calculated with the truncated distance at close approach. This is supported by the fact that at larger distances the two values agree again.

F.
Image

chris
Site Admin
Posts: 4211
Joined: 28.01.2002
With us: 22 years 9 months
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA

Re: Apparent Magnitude Question

Post #6by chris » 04.04.2008, 17:17

t00fri wrote:
selden wrote:They are:

Goto Rigel Kentaurus A
Open Star Browser
view AppMag in HUD: -28.40
view AppMag in Star Browser Menu: -21.38

I am just entering the case into the bugtracker. I am pretty sure that in the star browser the distance got calculated with the truncated distance at close approach. This is supported by the fact that at larger distances the two values agree again.

I checked and there are two problems with the Windows star browser: the star to observer distance is being calculating at single precision (really bad anywhere except in our solar system) and the current time is not used, which is another problem for stars like Alpha Centauri A that are in multistar systems. I checked in a fix for the Qt4 star browser, which was calculating distances at high precision but still suffered from the time problem. I'll fix the Windows star browser sometime when I'm not on my Mac.

--Chris

Topic author
Danial
Posts: 33
Joined: 31.03.2008
Age: 45
With us: 16 years 7 months
Location: Gold Coast, Australia

Re: Apparent Magnitude Question

Post #7by Danial » 06.04.2008, 09:29

Just did a little test and found that the 2 magnitude values don't match up until around 0.5ly distance. Not sure if that helps solve the problem or not.


Return to “Celestia Users”