----
Re Tinfish video - Space Time
----
Fridger wrote: ......
Hello Tinfish,
I had a look at your video, with mixed feelings, though. But I understood you wanted honest opinions, right?
-- A trivial remark to start: If your video involved Celestia, then Celestia should be acknowledged in writing (in the video).
-- Usually, /good/ films/videos have a story to tell. In case of your video this crucial aspect was all but obvious to me! There were lots of blendings in quite mediocre quality covering many issues that are fashionable these days, notably among people from a certain age window: some war scenes, some mystical E=mc^2 without content, some voices reciting some sentences about string theory, some space ship noises that we know from certain movies, flowers, a little bit of nature, nice animals, again some spaceship/satelite {sic} views, etc...
Yes all that fits to the video title "Space Time", but...
-- Personally, as a theoretical physicist, I am quite "allergic" as to such unfortunately popular, pseudoscientific displays, in particular if E=mc^2 and string theory slogans are mixed in. These concepts are very deep, and for sure they can only create confusion and at best a feel of mysticism if presented as you did.
-- Now, perhaps your video was meant purely as a "background" performance for relaxing and listening music etc....Hmm, in such case I am afraid, your video quality was by far not good enough, notably these low-quality foregound overlays along with the quite defocussed, lores background scenes did really not excite me too much.
Bye
Fridger
Hullo Fridger.
Thanks for taking the time to check out my video and comment on it.
First of all, regarding your concern that I never mentioned Celestia in the credits. I'm afraid that you failed to spot that there were no Celestia clips in this particular video. However I thought that members of this forum would still like to check the video out, as it has been popular on other space/sim forums. I'll no doubt include Celestia clips in my next video! -
Regarding your comment that - "usually, good videos have a story to tell", and, that in your opinion my video featured 'pseudoscientific displays' and "defocussed background scenes which did not get you "excited too much".
I should like to point out that the aim of my videos isn't to get people 'excited'. If you want 'excitement' you simply need to but some Hollywood movies instead. -
Secondly, I wasn?€™t aiming to produce a scientifically factual video to entertain the many theoretical (and armchair) physicists in our society
(a notoriously difficult group to please since their often overworked intellects often tend to analyse things too deeply) -
No, I simply make short flight-sim videos of an abstract/art kind (not a term many 'theoretical' physicists are comfortable with, I know).
This particular video was simply that: a short 5 minute art movie with a space/science slant which - if viewed with an open and non-judgemental mind, may well lead the viewer* to perhaps pause and wonder at their own lives and the wider world around them - without actually having to analyse and dissect the video frame by frame for its content, quality and scientific value.
(*Sample reviews enclosed).
Once again, thanks for taking the time.
Best regards.
Tinfish
UK
"We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality."
~ Albert Einstein
====
Sample quotes from forum members
(Note: These samples are included not as an ego booster for myself, but simply as an example of how different people from different walks of life have felt about to my rather abstract video, in the same way I felt while producing it, and aimed to create for my viewers.
?€?A very ethereal video. Contains an ambience of spirituality not found in most science related features.
And the inclusion of that quote by Rumi was just beautiful.
Marvellous video, Tinfish!?€