Appearance of anoxic Earths
Appearance of anoxic Earths
Here's a question I'm wondering about: presumably the chemistry of an anoxic Earth would produce a different set of minerals on the surface, but would this change the planet's appearance from space? I.e. if you took an anoxic world, would there be a significant difference in appearance from a planet with an oxygen atmosphere but no multicellular life?
You'd have to be more specific than 'anoxic'... you could call Venus an 'anoxic earth' in the sense that it's a roughly earthsized planet with no oxygen in the air, and it looks nothing like our planet .
What are the major constituents of the atmosphere? What are the minor constituents too? How much water vapour is there? How thick is the atmosphere? How far is it from its primary? How old is the planet/system? How long as it been 'anoxic'? Has it evolved through any other phases of evolution (eg is it pre-garden? post-garden? can't-possibly-ever-be-a-garden?).
I've seen discussions that suggest that if the earth hadn't been hit by a Mars-sized impactor early on, then we'd still have our primordial atmosphere today and we'd probably be more like Venus as a result now.
A lot of things can determine the look of the planet, you'd have to give a specific scenario for any advice to be any use...
What are the major constituents of the atmosphere? What are the minor constituents too? How much water vapour is there? How thick is the atmosphere? How far is it from its primary? How old is the planet/system? How long as it been 'anoxic'? Has it evolved through any other phases of evolution (eg is it pre-garden? post-garden? can't-possibly-ever-be-a-garden?).
I've seen discussions that suggest that if the earth hadn't been hit by a Mars-sized impactor early on, then we'd still have our primordial atmosphere today and we'd probably be more like Venus as a result now.
A lot of things can determine the look of the planet, you'd have to give a specific scenario for any advice to be any use...
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system
It doesn't address your question directly, but we've come up with a Planetary Classification List for the ArcBuilder setting. Hardly scientific, but we are working on it:
http://arcbuilder.home.bresnan.net/PCL4-2Index.html
Just don't take anything at face value, it *is* a fictional setting after all.
...John...
http://arcbuilder.home.bresnan.net/PCL4-2Index.html
Just don't take anything at face value, it *is* a fictional setting after all.
...John...
"To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe..."
--Carl Sagan
--Carl Sagan
If I may say so, John, I think your classification scheme is starting show significant problems... it almost seems like you're trying to come up with too many world types, and most of them would be so rare as to go largely unused and almost not worth the effort of defining. Plus the names are starting to get really clunky... "Brammi-HydroEuJovian Subtype"? "PrometheaThermAcidic Subdivision"?
I'd suggest that you consider trimming it down a lot, just to the core world classes. All the various subdivisions and types could pretty much be elaborated on as unique features of particular worlds.
I'd suggest that you consider trimming it down a lot, just to the core world classes. All the various subdivisions and types could pretty much be elaborated on as unique features of particular worlds.
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system
Malenfant wrote:If I may say so, John, I think your classification scheme is starting show significant problems... it almost seems like you're trying to come up with too many world types, and most of them would be so rare as to go largely unused and almost not worth the effort of defining. Plus the names are starting to get really clunky... "Brammi-HydroEuJovian Subtype"? "PrometheaThermAcidic Subdivision"?
I'd suggest that you consider trimming it down a lot, just to the core world classes. All the various subdivisions and types could pretty much be elaborated on as unique features of particular worlds.
To be honest, the PCL will never really be considered complete, and it is meant to reflect "discoveries" up to the "modern" era of the setting. Plus, remember that I said this is a work in progess... wait, I didn't. Well, I should have. A lot of the items here will either be trimmed heavily or removed entirely. What you're seeing is essentially a "sketch", I guess you could say.
Anyway, in reality I think the whole concept of planetary classification is pretty much impossible, except in the most general of ways.
...John...
"To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe..."
--Carl Sagan
--Carl Sagan
Was there still not a large quantity of methane in the atmosphere at this time? If so, then I think the world would have been wrapped in a thick, almost Titan-like atmosphere. Here's an image by Don Dixon illustrating it: http://www.cosmographica.com/gallery/po ... 04/21.htmlchaos syndrome wrote:Yeah, sorry, I should have been more specific. Let's go with Earth before photosynthesis but after the Hadean, I think this was the "second atmosphere", of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, water vapour.
...John...
"To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe..."
--Carl Sagan
--Carl Sagan
-
- Posts: 691
- Joined: 13.11.2003
- With us: 21 years 1 month
Methane isn't orange, though; in bulk it is slightly green. In depictions of Titan before any probes reached the Saturn system Titan is depiced with a thin green atmosphere. The orange is due to organics, like tholins, unless I am mistaken.
But there may have been tholins on Primeval Earth, so EoGaians (to use the PCL classification) could have had orange clouds.
But there may have been tholins on Primeval Earth, so EoGaians (to use the PCL classification) could have had orange clouds.
-
- Posts: 691
- Joined: 13.11.2003
- With us: 21 years 1 month
Oh yes; a N/CO2 atmosphere is very likely.
The first, or primary atmosphere would have been H and He but would have been rapidly lost.
Then outgassing of CO2, CH4, NH3 H20 and argon would form an atmosphere which would photodissociate, react with the crust and condense, until you get oceans under an atmosphere of N with a fair amount of CO2, a bit of argon and other stuff and water vapour depending on the temperature.
Methane would be destroyed, but replenished by methanogen bacteria on a planet with life.
Later oxygen would build up periodically, giving rise to Banded Iron formations. The early photosynthetic organisms were supposedly poisoned by their own oxygen, leading to diebacks. The anoxic crust would soak up oxygen like a sponge, and between ten and twenty times as much biogenic oxygen has disappeared into the crust as is present in our current atmosphere.
But when the exposed crust becomes oxidised thoroughly, O2 could build up in the atmosphere until our current (tertiary) atmosphere develops.
The first, or primary atmosphere would have been H and He but would have been rapidly lost.
Then outgassing of CO2, CH4, NH3 H20 and argon would form an atmosphere which would photodissociate, react with the crust and condense, until you get oceans under an atmosphere of N with a fair amount of CO2, a bit of argon and other stuff and water vapour depending on the temperature.
Methane would be destroyed, but replenished by methanogen bacteria on a planet with life.
Later oxygen would build up periodically, giving rise to Banded Iron formations. The early photosynthetic organisms were supposedly poisoned by their own oxygen, leading to diebacks. The anoxic crust would soak up oxygen like a sponge, and between ten and twenty times as much biogenic oxygen has disappeared into the crust as is present in our current atmosphere.
But when the exposed crust becomes oxidised thoroughly, O2 could build up in the atmosphere until our current (tertiary) atmosphere develops.
Thanks! So if the planet in question never gets to the photosynthetic life stage, the banded iron formations wouldn't happen.
Would the continents of such a planet end up looking Mars-like then? IIRC the red colour of Mars is caused by iron(III) oxide (haematite), which can form when there is water present.
Would the continents of such a planet end up looking Mars-like then? IIRC the red colour of Mars is caused by iron(III) oxide (haematite), which can form when there is water present.
-
- Posts: 691
- Joined: 13.11.2003
- With us: 21 years 1 month