Page 1 of 1

/!\ Eclipse of the Sun /!\ Monday 3rd of October 2005.

Posted: 30.09.2005, 20:07
by Fightspit
If you don't know, there will be an eclipse in Madrid almost 100 %:

Image


And almost 70-75 % in Paris:

Image

edit: The eclipse is at ~11h Local Time (Paris and Madrid).

Posted: 02.10.2005, 03:06
by WildMoon
:cry: It's not gonna be visible from Houston is it? :cry: Will I ever see an eclipse??? :?:

Posted: 02.10.2005, 07:20
by bdm
More information on this annular eclipse here:

http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/S ... E2005.html

Posted: 02.10.2005, 08:16
by piellepi
Hi WildMoon!
Please be patient! :D
You must wait til 2012 May 20 and 2014 October 23 to witness partial eclipses in Houston!!! :(
But if you sit down calmly and rest, you will see a better eclipse on 2017 August 21. :)
Then I hope you will see a TOTAL one in 2023 October 14!!! 8) 8) 8)

Here in Italy, my hope is to see tomorrow's eclipse: in fact weater forecast is ugly :x
Then the next one for us will be next March! :)

Bye bye
Pierluigi

Posted: 02.10.2005, 10:30
by Fightspit
For me, I must wait to 3 September 2081... :x to see a TOTAL eclipse near of Paris. 8) .
I will be 94 years old. 8O :lol:

Posted: 02.10.2005, 10:38
by jdou
Don't worry, You have one chance, me I will be dead :D

Posted: 02.10.2005, 14:48
by Jorge
And some 83-84% here in the Algarve. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to watch the eclipse, though, since at the time of its maximum I'm usually on the road. I may have to get late to work, but since it's probably going to be the largest eclipse I'll ever see I may do just that.

Posted: 02.10.2005, 18:14
by t00fri
While annular solar eclipses with 80-90% sound impressive,
my personal experience has been somewhat disappointing
after having observed several such annular eclipses already.

Clearly, with a telescope (having a Mylar foil in front!) it
looks great to watch the shadow moving in at high
magnification.

But the hard-to-describe amazing natural phenomena just
before a TOTAL eclipse are all lacking, unfortunately. The
sun is so bright that even a 80-90% coverage will not
darken the environment noticably. Correspondingly the
striking reactions of animals (birds etc...) are entirely
lacking along with this incredible twighlight, the racing-in
shadow, the famous "diamond"-ring effect, the visibility of
the corona etc...

Probably it's going to be bad weather in Hamburg
anyway...

Bye Fridger

Posted: 03.10.2005, 00:58
by WildMoon
The animals don't act as if to say "AAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!! WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!! I LOVE YOU HONEY!!! Hey, are those pancakes? Yum! Oh, right. AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!! WE GONNA DIE!!!!"?

Man, that sucks! :evil:


This means I'll have to conduct my evil plan to move the moon so that Houston'll see lots of eclipses and move the moon closer to Earth. :twisted: Might as well conduct my evil plan to stick a bunch of other moons in orbit of Earth and put a ring around Earth. :twisted: Muahahahahahaha!!! Oh wait, did I say that in public? Oopsy... :oops:

Posted: 03.10.2005, 11:42
by symaski62
http://img302.imageshack.us/my.php?image=Photo016.jpg

^^ photo 11H03m07

DIVION (PAS-DE-CALAIS) ; longitude : -2.50451?°, latitude : 50.46946?°, altitude : 79 m

Code: Select all

                                                    P (?°)       Z (?°)       a (?°)       h (?°)

Premier contact ext?©rieur :          7h 49m 44s      -71.69      -37.67      -61.27      16.76
Maximum ?©clipse partielle :          9h  3m  7s     -141.58     -115.12      -44.28      26.04
Dernier contact ext?©rieur :         10h 21m 36s      148.35      162.91      -23.19      32.96

Posted: 03.10.2005, 18:04
by Jorge
Well, it was pretty neat. Light dimmed quite a lot, temperature also chilled noticeably, and one or two birds even decided to emit an interrogative peep as if asking "what the heck?!"

The sun was reduced to a thin arc around here. It was a lot more intense than the largest eclipse I had seen before, in which about 60% of the sun's disc went black. Even so, it was pretty bright, considering. According to a little math I made, and I ask if anyone can kindly confirm (or not), the apparent magnitude of the Sun covered by 84% goes up a mere 1.9897, thus becoming -24.74. That's as bright as it looks at about 2.5 AU. Super.

Posted: 03.10.2005, 20:40
by maxim
A partial eclipse does never even nearly show the impression that a total eclipse does. In fact, even until the very last moment it stays rather bright - about like a very cloudy and stormy afternoon. If the sky is cloud covered during eclipse, you couldn't tell if it's the eclipse, or a thunderstorm approaching.

In the very last moments you see the sun crescent melt, until a single bright drop remains, which then disappears. And only AFTER that, light vanishes as if someone dims it down with a fader control. Within about 5 sec it becomes black night, while the horizon is shining in bright sunlight. It's creepy.

maxim

Posted: 21.10.2005, 02:22
by Matt McIrvin
I photographed the eclipse projected on the ground by trees in Barcelona, where it was partial but the crescent got fairly thin. You can see a picture here:

http://pics.livejournal.com/mmcirvin/pic/000112bc

Most people on the street probably had no idea anything unusual was happening. The light got noticeably dimmer and cooler to the skin, which made it a nice time for a walk.

Posted: 21.10.2005, 02:27
by Dollan
I just love that effect. Thanks for the picture, Matt.

...John...