Could a supernova by Betelgeuse threaten life on Earth?

General physics and astronomy discussions not directly related to Celestia
Avatar
Topic author
fsgregs
Posts: 1307
Joined: 07.10.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months
Location: Manassas, VA

Could a supernova by Betelgeuse threaten life on Earth?

Post #1by fsgregs » 27.01.2004, 23:32

Hi folks:

In doing some star research, I ran across two different articles suggesting that although Betelgeuse is further away from Earth than the "theoretical" distance needed for a supernova to cause a mass extinction on Earth (the distance is 3 x e17 meters), these articles claimed that the gamma and x-ray flux from a supernova at Betelgeuse would be sufficient to wipe out the ozone layer for 50 years or more, which could cause some major disruptions and potential extinctions of life on Earth. I've tried to find the articles again and/or see what other web articles had to say about it, but I've not had much luck.

I'd love your comments

:)

Is it possible?

Frank

maxim
Posts: 1036
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 21 years
Location: N?rnberg, Germany

Post #2by maxim » 27.01.2004, 23:59

I've shortly read an article about the hypothesis that one early of the several 'live drops' in earth history - ~350 billion years ago, only primitive lifeforms that times, ~90 percent of the species where wiped out - was caused by a nearby supernova explosion. Effects: destroyed ozone layer, serious changes in atmosphere composition.

Unfortunately I don't remember where it was. Perhaps a search with paleontologic terms would give results.

maxim.

maxim
Posts: 1036
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 21 years
Location: N?rnberg, Germany

Post #3by maxim » 28.01.2004, 00:21

I've got it. It was 440 billion years ago, and there vanished 66% of lifeforms:

http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/erde/0,1518,281044,00.html

unfortunately it's in german. But there is a link at the end, refering to the origing of the message: http://www.aas.org/

maxim

granthutchison
Developer
Posts: 1863
Joined: 21.11.2002
With us: 22 years

Post #4by granthutchison » 28.01.2004, 00:26


Don. Edwards
Posts: 1510
Joined: 07.09.2002
Age: 59
With us: 22 years 3 months
Location: Albany, Oregon

Post #5by Don. Edwards » 28.01.2004, 02:28

Maxim,
I think you mean 440 million years not billion years. The universe itself isn't that old. Only close to 15 billion.

Don. Edwards
I am officially a retired member.
I might answer a PM or a post if its relevant to something.

Ah, never say never!!
Past texture releases, Hmm let me think about it

Thanks for your understanding.

maxim
Posts: 1036
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 21 years
Location: N?rnberg, Germany

Post #6by maxim » 28.01.2004, 10:19

Don. Edwards wrote:I think you mean 440 million years not billion years.

Yes, I did mean 'million'. Sorry.

Actually I know few about things that happend 20 universes ago. ;)

maxim

eburacum45
Posts: 691
Joined: 13.11.2003
With us: 21 years

Post #7by eburacum45 » 28.01.2004, 19:26

Have you found this article? I find it very informative.
http://stupendous.rit.edu/richmond/answers/snrisks.txt


Return to “Physics and Astronomy”