Page 3 of 3

Posted: 22.08.2006, 22:01
by ANDREA
A friend of mine, an Italian astronomer attending the Prague Convention, sent me just now an email informing me that (even if this is not official, obviously), at 06:30 P.M. (GMT time), after a long and very animate discussion, the "double planet" definition has been deleted from the IAU Resolution, so actually Charon's future is back in moons family. :D
Moreover now Pluto is definied as "dwarf planet", head of the new category of "Plutonids". 8O
Well, IMHO from bad to worse. :evil:

Anyhow, this is the new IAU resolution, that almost surely will be approved next Thursday:

*************************************************

Code: Select all

IAU Resolution: Definition of a Planet in the Solar System*

Contemporary observations are changing our understanding od planetary systems, and it is important that our nomenclature for objects reflect our current understanding. This applies, in particular, to the designation 'planets'. The word 'planet' originally described as 'wanderers' that were known only as moving lights in the sky. Recent discoveries lead us to create a new definition, which we can make using currently available scientific information.
*
RESOLUTION 5 (draft c)*
The IAU therefore resolves that planets and other bodies in our Solar System be defined into three distinct categories in the following way:

1) A planet is a celestial body that (a) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape (NOTE: An IAU process will be established to assign borderline objects into either dwarf-planet and other categories), (b) is the dominant object in its local population zone, and (c) is in orbit around the Sun.

2) A dwarf-planet is a celestial body that (a) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape (NOTE: An IAU process will be established to assign borderline objects into either dwarf-planet and other categories) and (b) is in orbit around the Sun.

3) All other objects orbiting the Sun, currently including most of the Solar System asteroids, near-Earth objects (NEOs), Mars-, Jupiter-, Neptune- Trojan asteroids, most Centaurs, most Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), and comets, shall be referred to collectively as "Small Solar System Bodies". In the new nomenclature the term "minor planet" is not used.
*
RESOLUTION 6 (draft c)
*The IAU further resolves:

Pluto is a dwarf-planet by the above definition, as are one or more recently discovered large trans-Neptunian objects. Dwarf-planets that have orbital periods in excess of 200years and typically have highly inclined orbits with large eccentricity are designated category of planetary objects, of which Pluto is the prototype, as a new class that we call 'plutonids'.

****************************************************

Well, astronomy is even this, sometimes.
Bye

Andrea :D

Posted: 23.08.2006, 00:12
by Malenfant
I hate the term "Dwarf Planet", it sounds so stupid!

I have no idea why they suddenly decided to discard the term "minor planet", since that's basically what these bodies are.

Posted: 23.08.2006, 00:17
by Hunter Parasite
This is very depressing.

Posted: 23.08.2006, 10:26
by Neethis
:( Im almost sorry I started the topic now... lol

Posted: 24.08.2006, 00:01
by Hunter Parasite
This is just plain sad. I bet they just want to look better than the aliens by saying, "Oh look, we have 12 planets, while you only have 4!!" or something like that.

Posted: 24.08.2006, 00:03
by chris
Mostly relevant . . . This is a beautiful diagram of the Kuiper Belt, showing radii, orbits, and resonances (with Neptune) of KBOs:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:TheK ... AU_All.svg

--Chris

Posted: 24.08.2006, 14:17
by Malenfant
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/0 ... ition.html

The final decision: There are eight official Planets, Pluto isn't one of them. But at least there's none of this "pluton" crap either...

Posted: 24.08.2006, 14:49
by Neethis
But "dwarf planets".... what was wrong with "minor planets"? :( lol. Apart from that it seems like a fairly good compromise, personally.

Posted: 24.08.2006, 15:02
by Scytale
Hmm... what would Homer say?

Woohoo... in your face, Pluto!
(mumbling)Lousy, icy planetoid with barely enough mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium...

Posted: 18.11.2019, 22:46
by Joey P.
We now have the hypothetical planets Planet Ten and Planet Nine (disc. 2016).

Planet Ten is closer to the Sun than Planet Nine, so the sequence goes:
Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, Planet Ten, Planet Nine.

Planet Ten orbits the Sun 60 astronomical units away from the Sun and is estimated to be as massive as Mars. Personally, I want it to be named "Minerva" after the Roman wisdom goddess.

Planet Nine orbits the Sun orbits the Sun up to 500 astronomical units away from the Sun and is estimated to be an ice giant super-Earth at 10 Earth masses. Personally, I want it to be named "Ghost Zone" after the Danny Phantom realm (well, we only knew about it because of its gravitational effect and it's so dark...)

Proof of their existance is the clustering and eccentric orbits of various Kuiper Belt objects and sednoids. They both likely exist; the probability of them not existing and the evidence being nothing more than coincidences is less than 1%!