Page 2 of 2

Posted: 10.01.2005, 22:06
by Darkshot
Yeah yeah, but this could be the Death Star II maybe, I don't know. But Mimas doesnt have the trench (aka mountain range ;) ) that this does. There is room in our solar system for two Death Stars i suppose. Any more will not do.

Posted: 10.01.2005, 22:32
by Brendan
Darkshot wrote:Yeah yeah, but this could be the Death Star II maybe, I don't know. But Mimas doesnt have the trench (aka mountain range ;) ) that this does. There is room in our solar system for two Death Stars i suppose. Any more will not do.


Don't forget Tethys and its crater Odysseus. :wink:

Brendan

Posted: 10.01.2005, 22:37
by Darkshot
Well sheesh, where is the Alliance when you need them, the Death Star is mating when we arent looking... But Tethys i dont think is as Death Star-ish.

Posted: 11.01.2005, 05:11
by Dollan
Now, if we found a moon that had that equatorial ridge AND the major, centrally-peaked crater, I would really start getting suspicious.....

Posted: 12.01.2005, 03:27
by Darkshot
I suppose you mean equatorial trench, cause Iapetus already has an "equatorial ridge and centrally peaked crater" as you put it. Now if we found one with an equatorial trench... Interesting. I think it is just a common feature for some moons to have huge craters that look like death star guns. If you think about it, the Death Star isn't really that complex of a shape lol. So I'd say we are bound to find more moons that have craters like that. But that ridge is really something different.