The truth about Comet McNaught

General physics and astronomy discussions not directly related to Celestia
Topic author
danielj
Posts: 1477
Joined: 15.08.2003
With us: 21 years 4 months

The truth about Comet McNaught

Post #1by danielj » 17.03.2007, 03:11

The comet McNaught wasn??t so spetacular in the Southern Hemisphere,contrary to the common belief of europeans and americans,because in Sao Paulo,rained most of the time and even when it didn??t,the comet was so low that only in places with a clear horizon and relatively high altitude,could be seen anything.So not everyone see an spetacle.Me,for example,saw the comet only at day and with binoculars,once.Many people tried to see the comet at midday,but doing this near the sun was very dangerous.So,although it was the brightest comet in years,it paled because the great nearness to the Sun and the time of the year wasn??t very good because it was rainy season.So I am still waiting for a GREAT COMET.Even Halle-Bopp and Hyakutake and perhaps Halley was much better than this McNaught...

Dollan
Posts: 1150
Joined: 18.12.2003
Age: 54
With us: 21 years
Location: Havre, Montana

Post #2by Dollan » 17.03.2007, 06:52

Even in Montana, I saw McNaught several times, and it was spectacular, *far* outshining any of those previous comets. It easily rivaled Venus in brightness (which lay fairly close to it towards the end of its northern hemisphere run), and it displayed a fine, if somewhat truncated, tail.

I would submit, Daniel, that you simply had crappy luck when trying to view it. Certainly the potential exists for bright comets to be in more favorable positions, but thus far, in my nearly 37 years of life, this was the best comet that I had ever seen (having missed out on Comet West of 1976 thanks to a lack of interest... and being only 6 years old at the time).
"To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe..."
--Carl Sagan

buggs_moran
Posts: 835
Joined: 27.09.2004
With us: 20 years 2 months
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Post #3by buggs_moran » 17.03.2007, 14:09

Ditto Dolan,

I only caught one glimpse of McNaught on an afternoon before it went south but it was impressive to see in the twilight. It was ridiculously cloudy here for the few weeks of visibility and on days that it was nice, time and work did not go in my favor. Sorry it didn't go better for you Daniel.

Hale Bopp in Texas was my best ever. And I saw Halley from the top of a ski mountain in 86', but it was disappointing. The caveat was that we got to ski until dawn. Quite an experience.

My favorite shot of McNaught is here
http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnwhite/366649244/
Last edited by buggs_moran on 19.03.2007, 12:18, edited 1 time in total.
Homebrew:
WinXP Pro SP2
Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe
AMD Athlon XP 3000/333 2.16 GHz
1 GB Crucial RAM
80 GB WD SATA drive
ATI AIW 9600XT 128M

Avatar
Hungry4info
Posts: 1133
Joined: 11.09.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months
Location: Indiana, United States

Post #4by Hungry4info » 17.03.2007, 15:57

My luck with observing McNaught was even worse. There was a cold front or something that moved in right before the comet was visible. Clouds covered the entire sky. The clouds left (as expected...) the day that the comet was no longer visible from my latitude.
Current Setup:
Windows 7 64 bit. Celestia 1.6.0.
AMD Athlon Processor, 1.6 Ghz, 3 Gb RAM
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics

Avatar
LordFerret M
Posts: 737
Joined: 24.08.2006
Age: 68
With us: 18 years 3 months
Location: NJ USA

Post #5by LordFerret » 19.03.2007, 06:32

I didn't get to see it at all, except through the pictures and description as seen through Guillermo Abramson's eyes - for which I'm grateful he'd taken the time and effort to provide!

So - thanks again Guillerno! :D


Return to “Physics and Astronomy”