Eyepieces choice for a telescope.

General physics and astronomy discussions not directly related to Celestia
Topic author
Fightspit
Posts: 510
Joined: 15.05.2005
With us: 19 years 7 months

Eyepieces choice for a telescope.

Post #1by Fightspit » 02.01.2007, 16:50

Hi,

I get recently a telescope Meade ETX105PE with a standard eyepice 26mm (super Ploessl serie 4000) and I want to have some advise for choosing eyepieces (range of zoom (nb of eyepiece), good zoom, do I take a barlow lense ?, serie 5000 eyepiece ?, FOV (super or ultra wide angle ?), etc ...)
About zoom, I know there is a limit but not his value, how to know the max.
I have not a particular limit of my budget but I want to get a good "quality/investissement".

That is all, what do you think.
Motherboard: Intel D975XBX2
Processor: Intel Core2 E6700 @ 3Ghz
Ram: Corsair 2 x 1GB DDR2 PC6400
Video Card: Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB GDDR3 384 bits PCI-Express 16x
HDD: Western Digital Raptor 150GB 10000 rpm
OS: Windows Vista Business 32 bits

Avatar
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 8 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: Eyepieces choice for a telescope.

Post #2by t00fri » 02.01.2007, 18:57

Fightspit wrote:Hi,

I get recently a telescope Meade ETX105PE with a standard eyepice 26mm (super Ploessl serie 4000) and I want to have some advise for choosing eyepieces (range of zoom (nb of eyepiece), good zoom, do I take a barlow lense ?, serie 5000 eyepiece ?, FOV (super or ultra wide angle ?), etc ...)
About zoom, I know there is a limit but not his value, how to know the max.
I have not a particular limit of my budget but I want to get a good "quality/investissement".

That is all, what do you think.


The Primary Edtion (PE) ETX105PE is a Maksutov-Cassegrain folded design and reminds a lot of the famous Questar from a long time ago.

It has an D= 105 mm clear aperture. In general there is a golden rule for the maximum usable magnification M_max of any telscope.

It's

Code: Select all

M_max ~ 2 * D [mm]


Hence any magnification larger than ~200-250 is "empty". This maximum value can at best be used at VERY good seing conditions!

Since the focal length is f=1470 mm (f/14) the minimum eyepiece focal length one may use is

Code: Select all

f_min = f/M_max ~  6.5 mm


with your 26mm eyepiece, you correspondingly get about 57x magnification.

Moreover, the "apparent field" size d_app is calculated as

Code: Select all


d_app = d_eyepiece/ magnification


so with 225x magnification, and a ~ 6.4mm Ploessl typically having a 50 degree field, you get about 13 acrmins of visible field. Remember that the Moon has a diameter of ~30 arcmins.

So I would advice on VERY GOOD optics, i.e. e.g. another Super Ploessl of >= 6.4mm fl. There are also special wide angle eyepieces with fields as big as 82 degrees (e.g. NAGLER). But they tend to get VERY expensive. 65 degrees is a very convenient field (e.g. ERFLE type, 5-6 lenses) and is still not so expensive

I hope this helps a bit.

Bye Fridger
Image

Topic author
Fightspit
Posts: 510
Joined: 15.05.2005
With us: 19 years 7 months

Post #3by Fightspit » 02.01.2007, 19:59

Thanks for the info :)

About barlow lenses, what do you recommend me ? A barlow with a "medium" eyepiece or a small eypiece (e.g. using barlow 2x and 18mm or using a 9mm)?
Motherboard: Intel D975XBX2
Processor: Intel Core2 E6700 @ 3Ghz
Ram: Corsair 2 x 1GB DDR2 PC6400
Video Card: Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB GDDR3 384 bits PCI-Express 16x
HDD: Western Digital Raptor 150GB 10000 rpm
OS: Windows Vista Business 32 bits

Avatar
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 8 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #4by t00fri » 02.01.2007, 21:24

Fightspit wrote:Thanks for the info :)

About barlow lenses, what do you recommend me ? A barlow with a "medium" eyepiece or a small eypiece (e.g. using barlow 2x and 18mm or using a 9mm)?


Yes a Barlow lens is a possibility to have more "options" in magnification.
However, image quality is always lower than with a dedicated high-quality short focus eyepiece. So it's certainly a compromise. The Barlow MUST be achromatic (<=> 2 lenses) but the really good Barlows now have up to 4 lenses. Also it's sensible to choose the multiplication factor some odd number like 2.4 (not 2).

Another MOST crucial fact both with separate eyepieces and notably with Barlows is that ALL lenses have a high-quality COATING! Since eyepieces generally have 8-12 glass surfaces (!) it is paramount to minimize light reflection from each one!!!

Bye Fridger
Image

Topic author
Fightspit
Posts: 510
Joined: 15.05.2005
With us: 19 years 7 months

Post #5by Fightspit » 03.01.2007, 15:58

Thanks for all explanations :)
Motherboard: Intel D975XBX2
Processor: Intel Core2 E6700 @ 3Ghz
Ram: Corsair 2 x 1GB DDR2 PC6400
Video Card: Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB GDDR3 384 bits PCI-Express 16x
HDD: Western Digital Raptor 150GB 10000 rpm
OS: Windows Vista Business 32 bits


Return to “Physics and Astronomy”