Saturn featurless in visible light?

General physics and astronomy discussions not directly related to Celestia
Topic author
danielj
Posts: 1477
Joined: 15.08.2003
With us: 21 years 3 months

Saturn featurless in visible light?

Post #1by danielj » 30.10.2004, 16:32

I saw very nice photos of the ringed planet,but most of them(which shows storms and swirls),are in infrared.Could be Saturn feauterless in visible light?To the human eyes,Saturn will appear rather bland,I guess...if it?s not true,where are the visible light images.
I understand that Titan has a dense cover of clouds,and the surface is almost hidden in visuals wavelenghts.But does the Saturn?s haze act in the same way?

Evil Dr Ganymede
Posts: 1386
Joined: 06.06.2003
With us: 21 years 6 months

Post #2by Evil Dr Ganymede » 30.10.2004, 17:25


Topic author
danielj
Posts: 1477
Joined: 15.08.2003
With us: 21 years 3 months

Post #3by danielj » 30.10.2004, 19:30

You can see the colors well,and the bands.But the most spetacular features like swirls and storms are only seen in infrared light.This is the opposite of what happen in Jupiter,when even in visible light,there is plenty of storms.
I wish Cassini made a image of some storms or swirls in visible light.
What we get until now is almost useless to build a new Saturn texture.
Maybe the correct representation of the planet is by putting saturn.png as a cloudmap.What do you think?

ElPelado
Posts: 862
Joined: 07.04.2003
With us: 21 years 8 months
Location: Born in Argentina
Contact:

Post #4by ElPelado » 01.11.2004, 14:19

I've been thinking about this for a long time:
-Imagine Saturn with out the rings? It would be one of the most boring things to look at in the sky
-Imagine Jupiter with out the cloud bands(it would be something similar to Saturn) and with out the galilean moons, also boring...
-Imagine Mars clouded as Venus... another one-color-boring-ball...
-Imagine Venus in the position of Mars or anyother place farther from teh Sun than us, with out its phases like the moon...

I think each planet has its own special feature, in saturn you have the Rings, and thas enough to impress everyone :wink:
---------X---------
EL XENTENARIO
1905-2005

My page:
http://www.urielpelado.com.ar
My Gallery:
http://www.celestiaproject.net/gallery/view_al ... y-Universe

Michael Kilderry
Posts: 499
Joined: 11.10.2004
With us: 20 years 2 months
Location: London, UK

Post #5by Michael Kilderry » 02.11.2004, 04:40

Uranus is a bit like how featureless Saturn would look without rings (although it does have them, but they are not clearly visible, not to mention the different colour).

The thing that makes Uranus interesting is that it rotates on it's side, although some people still think that it is pretty boring. :(

Michael Kilderry :)
My shatters.net posting milestones:

First post - 11th October 2004
100th post - 11th November 2004
200th post - 23rd January 2005
300th post - 21st February 2005
400th post - 23rd July 2005

First addon: The Lera Solar System

- Michael

Ynjevi
Posts: 132
Joined: 13.01.2003
With us: 21 years 10 months

Post #6by Ynjevi » 02.11.2004, 07:53

Michael Kilderry wrote:Uranus is a bit like how featureless Saturn would look without rings (although it does have them, but they are not clearly visible, not to mention the different colour).

The thing that makes Uranus interesting is that it rotates on it's side, although some people still think that it is pretty boring. :(


It's springtime in Uranus, and the atmosphere is getting more active. Recent Hubble observations show some clouds (cirrus?) on Uranus. So it may just have been a very dull time at the time of Voyager 2 flyby. But of course it is never as featured as Jupiter or Saturn.

Matt McIrvin
Posts: 312
Joined: 04.03.2002
With us: 22 years 9 months

Post #7by Matt McIrvin » 01.01.2005, 15:37

Ynjevi wrote:It's springtime in Uranus, and the atmosphere is getting more active. Recent Hubble observations show some clouds (cirrus?) on Uranus. So it may just have been a very dull time at the time of Voyager 2 flyby. But of course it is never as featured as Jupiter or Saturn.


Those recent pictures make Uranus look remarkably similar to Neptune. I guess it makes some sense, since at this season, the illumination is coming from a similar direction relative to the poles of the planet. Keep in mind also that they're in the infrared:

http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0411/10uranusweather/

Matt McIrvin
Posts: 312
Joined: 04.03.2002
With us: 22 years 9 months

Post #8by Matt McIrvin » 01.01.2005, 15:38



...actually these are from Keck, not Hubble.

Ynjevi
Posts: 132
Joined: 13.01.2003
With us: 21 years 10 months

Post #9by Ynjevi » 01.01.2005, 20:24

I was probably thinking about this Hubble release. But you're right, both planets look rather dull in visible light.


Return to “Physics and Astronomy”