Hubble servicing mission cancelled

General physics and astronomy discussions not directly related to Celestia
Topic author
JackHiggins
Posts: 1034
Joined: 16.12.2002
With us: 21 years 11 months
Location: People's Republic Of Cork, Ireland

Hubble servicing mission cancelled

Post #1by JackHiggins » 16.01.2004, 22:54

NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe told engineers and scientists today that he has decided to cancel a planned shuttle mission in 2006 to service and upgrade the Hubble Space Telescope, one of the most scientifically productive spacecraft ever launched.


http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0401/16hubblesm4/

:cry: :cry: :cry:
- Jack Higgins
Jack's Celestia Add-ons
And visit my Celestia Gallery too!

don
Posts: 1709
Joined: 12.07.2003
With us: 21 years 4 months
Location: Colorado, USA (7000 ft)

Post #2by don » 17.01.2004, 22:13

How sad. :cry:

Topic author
JackHiggins
Posts: 1034
Joined: 16.12.2002
With us: 21 years 11 months
Location: People's Republic Of Cork, Ireland

Post #3by JackHiggins » 17.01.2004, 22:22

If only development on the OSP or the new "Crew exploration vehicle" had started a few years ago... This kind of thing really shows up the shortcomings of the shuttle- imagine if the designers had been told in the 70s that "this craft will eventually be too dangerous to launch on its own, so we'll need a space-based backup system..."
- Jack Higgins

Jack's Celestia Add-ons

And visit my Celestia Gallery too!

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 3 months
Location: NY, USA

Post #4by selden » 18.01.2004, 00:12

I am too furious for words...
Selden

Brendan
Posts: 296
Joined: 15.07.2003
With us: 21 years 4 months
Location: Bellows Falls, VT
Contact:

Post #5by Brendan » 18.01.2004, 22:39

I read on space.com that they may send a spacecraft to Hubble that will get attached to it and then deorbit it. Why can't they make it go the other way into a bigger orbit or maybe even a solar orbit so that one day we could get it back and put it into a museum. They said that they didn't want to send it to a higher orbit because they didn't want to create a problem for future generations. But they already did with all of that space junk. :roll:
I still hope that they can squeeze some more out of Hubble and then make sure that it doesn't make an uncontrolled deorbit that could have the mirror and the ring around it hit someone. 8O
http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/hubble_demise_030804.html

They figured that if Hubble does go on an uncontrolled deorbit, the chance of human casualty is 1/700 with NASA requiring 1/10000 or less.
It would be sad if someone who enjoyed the Hubble images was the unlucky one. :cry:

Brendan


Return to “Physics and Astronomy”