Many of the recently discovered moons of Saturn and Uranus have not yet had their orbits accurately measured. Grant Hutchison has provided an SSC catalog for them, however, specifying the values that have been determined.
For the catalog and more information, please see http://www.lepp.cornell.edu/~seb/celestia/hutchison/poormoons.html
.
Moons with poorly known orbits
I seem to already have orbit definitions for 2004S1, 2004S2, and 2004S3, which I must have picked up earlier from this forum.
I shall delete the old ssc file(s) and install this new complete package.
cheers,
TERRIER
I shall delete the old ssc file(s) and install this new complete package.
cheers,
TERRIER
1.6.0:AMDAth1.2GHz 1GbDDR266:Ge6200 256mbDDR250:WinXP-SP3:1280x1024x32FS:v196.21@AA4x:AF16x:IS=HQ:T.Buff=ON Earth16Kdds@15KkmArctic2000AD:FOV1:SPEC L5dds:NORM L5dxt5:CLOUD L5dds:
NIGHT L5dds:MOON L4dds:GALXY ON:MAG 15.2-SAP:TIME 1000x:RP=OGL2:10.3FPS
NIGHT L5dds:MOON L4dds:GALXY ON:MAG 15.2-SAP:TIME 1000x:RP=OGL2:10.3FPS
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: 18.12.2003
- With us: 21 years 3 months
- Location: Canada
Mistaken orbital periods?
I think there's a mistake in this file: the new Saturn moons are orbiting much slower than their neighbours:
cel://Follow/Sol:Saturn/2005-03-28T04:3 ... 1&lm=49156
I realise that the orbits are not yet perfectly defined but presumably they orbit at a similar speed to their neighbours? Or am I missing something?
cel://Follow/Sol:Saturn/2005-03-28T04:3 ... 1&lm=49156
I realise that the orbits are not yet perfectly defined but presumably they orbit at a similar speed to their neighbours? Or am I missing something?
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: 18.12.2003
- With us: 21 years 3 months
- Location: Canada
So we now have 'smallmoons.ssc', 'tinymoons.ssc', 'numberedmoons.ssc', 'minormoons.ssc', 'littlemoons.ssc', 'poormoons.ssc' and what else?
I wish someone would take responsibility for this whole crap and transfer it into a more intuitive format. What about one file for every planet? I mean, it's the same situation as with asteroids - the data is split over a dozen files, with no noticeable classification between it. Isn't there any underlying sientific structure we can build upon?
maxim
I wish someone would take responsibility for this whole crap and transfer it into a more intuitive format. What about one file for every planet? I mean, it's the same situation as with asteroids - the data is split over a dozen files, with no noticeable classification between it. Isn't there any underlying sientific structure we can build upon?
maxim
-
Jeam Tag
- Posts: 540
- Joined: 01.04.2003
- Age: 60
- With us: 22 years
- Location: Southern suburb, Paris, France
'uoo.ssc' (Unidentified Orbiting Objects)maxim wrote:So we now have 'smallmoons.ssc', 'tinymoons.ssc', 'numberedmoons.ssc', 'minormoons.ssc', 'littlemoons.ssc', 'poormoons.ssc' and what else?

So, Maxim, what is 'littlemoons.ssc'? Seems to me i miss this addon reference in my catalog (i'll uptade it with this recent Grant's contribution), where is it? Jeam
Catalogue des ajouts /Catalog for the Add-Ons in French
...PAGES LOSTS, SORRY
...PAGES LOSTS, SORRY
-
Jeam Tag
- Posts: 540
- Joined: 01.04.2003
- Age: 60
- With us: 22 years
- Location: Southern suburb, Paris, France
Arf, I'll must archive it with my 'uoo's.ssc' .maxim wrote:Jeam Tag wrote:So, Maxim, what is 'littlemoons.ssc'? Seems to me i miss this addon reference in my catalog (i'll uptade it with this recent Grant's contribution), where is it? JeamI'd been ironic - it doesn't exist.maxim

Catalogue des ajouts /Catalog for the Add-Ons in French
...PAGES LOSTS, SORRY
...PAGES LOSTS, SORRY