Poll: Exoplanet Catalogue planet ordering

[Sirius_Alpha]

In the Celestia Discord, SevenSpheres proposed changing the ordering of the planets in the Exoplanet Catalogue such that when hitting 1, 2, 3, etc... on the keyboard, rather than selecting the planets in order of discovery, it is changed to selecting them in order of the distance from the star.

If the keybinding is changed such that they are in order of the distance to the star, it will bring it into conformity with the original extrasolar.ssc file. However in situations where there are unconfirmed planets, since they are in separate .ssc files, reaching for the 1 key may not select the nearest planet to the star anyway in cases where the nearest planet is unconfirmed.

Take for example 55 Cnc A. There are five known planets. The innermost planet was the fourth planet discovered, then the final planet discovered was ~in the habitable zone, the fourth (known) planet from the star. In my mind, 55 Cnc e is the "fourth planet" in the system because of the discovery order. If I'm in the system and I want to select it, I would instinctively reach for the 4 key. But I understand that not everyone thinks that way because not everyone is so mentally attached to the history and development of the scientific literature on the system.

So I am putting it up to a vote.

[Lafuente_Astronomy]

I think logically speaking, 1 should be the nearest planet.

[SevenSpheres]

So apparently ordinary users can make polls in "Add-on development" too... so confused...

Anyway, I think ordering by distance definitely makes the most sense, because in the long run the discovery order is irrelevant, and the planet letters are sometimes inconsistent between papers (e.g. Mu Arae, the Tuomi et al mess). This would only be for confirmed planets; I would not want the 1 key to select an unconfirmed planet unless there are no confirmed planets in the system.

[Art Blos]

Better to act by analogy with the Solar system, where is the order by distance.

[jujuapapa]

Agree with ArtBlos.

After all, we are well on the third rock after the sun !

[Gurren Lagann]

Actually, Earth can be anywhere from the 4th rock (Mercury, Venus, 2020 CD3, and Earth) to beyond the 15000th rock - because of NEAs, comets, and more

[jujuapapa]

As the title said : "planet" not rock or stone or...

The day is far to detect anything around another star smaller than a rocky planet !

[Gurren Lagann]

Then what about Kepler-37b? Its around the size of the moon.

[Sirius_Alpha]

Better to act by analogy with the Solar system, where is the order by distance.

The Solar System is compatible with both conventions. The classical planets -- Mercury through Saturn -- have been known since antiquity and therefore there's no "discovery order" for them. Uranus and Neptune were discovered in the order of their distance as well.

[jujuapapa]

@sirius_alpha : FYI, Mercury through Saturn with visual method (human eyes),
Uranus and Neptune : discovered by mathematical methods...

[Anthony_B_Russo10]

Uranus was discovered with a telescope, Neptune was discovered with math.

[Art Blos]

The Solar System is compatible with both conventions. The classical planets -- Mercury through Saturn -- have been known since antiquity and therefore there's no "discovery order" for them. Uranus and Neptune were discovered in the order of their distance as well.

The order by discovery date can be interesting only when user viewing a table on Wikipedia.
When he using the simulator, ordering by distance to the central body is much more convenient.

If the numeric keys worked with the moons of Jupiter according to the discovery date, this would not give the user anything.

[Fafers_br]

The tree displayed in the solar system browser, with the star on the top and the planets below, also gives the "feeling" of increasing distance from the star as you go down the planet list. So, it's one more reason in favor of the distance order. As long as the order of discovery date is reflected (and respected) in the names' letters, this information will not be lost.

[jujuapapa]

Anthony_B_Russo10 » 07.03.2020, 19:07
Uranus was discovered with a telescope, Neptune was discovered with math.

Professional astronomers realize mathematical searches before official publishing, right ?
I think that Herschel didn't believe to the chance...

[Sirius_Alpha]

Well, the results of the poll are unambiguous to say the least. The .ssc order of the planets has been changed as of the April 2020 version of the exoplanet catalogue.