The attached image compares the model to the three main Cassini views from Rev16 (October 11, 2005), Rev19 (December 25, 2005), and Rev117 (August 27, 2009). Some differences seem to result from assumptions that the two main views used to generate this model (Rev16 and Rev117) were centered over the equator, so the simulated views seem to be looking further to the south in the Rev16 shot from Celestia and further to the north in the Rev117 shot.
Celestia_Real_comparison.jpg
Some data for these three views:
Rev16 - Distance to center=9852.9187 km; October 11, 2005 20:21:04.410; 0.0587 km/pixel; Sub-Cassini Latitude and longitude: 20.867 South, 260.505 West
Rev19 - Distance to center=19809.552 km; December 25, 2005 00:31:16.340; 0.1181 km/pixel; Sub-Cassini Latitude and longitude: 3.834 South, 254.302 West
Rev117 - Distance to center=35987.635 km; August 27, 2009 14:28:09.560; 0.2155 km/pixel (magnified 2x in attached image); Sub-Cassini Latitude and longitude: 13.965 North, 97.047 West
In general, in addition to the changes to correct for the differences in the assumed sub-spacecraft latitude and the predicted one, it looks like the big, leading hemisphere crater seen in the Rev117 comparison could be moved about 7 degrees to the east. The features seen in Rev16 and Rev19 on the trailing hemisphere could be moved a bit to the west, maybe ~5-10 degrees.