Solar System Lagrange Points - FINAL VERSION AVAILABLE

Post requests, images, descriptions and reports about work in progress here.
Avatar
Topic author
Chuft-Captain
Posts: 1779
Joined: 18.12.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months

Post #41by Chuft-Captain » 06.02.2008, 16:22

MKruer wrote:Whoops missed that one. As to your questions,

The L4 and L5 points are home to stable orbits so long as the mass ratio between the two large masses exceeds 24.96
http://www.physics.montana.edu/faculty/ ... range.html

L1-L3 will continue to exist regardless.
Thanks MKreur,
My model already includes the 24.96 threshold in it's calculations (you'll notice it doesn't include Charon-L4 and Charon-L5 for the Pluto-Charon system).

What I was actually questioning is whether the existence of the 4th body (Charon) breaks the model altogether for Nix and Hydra. (Remember that the formulae are based on a 3-body approximation)
Charon's orbit lies about 1/2 way between Pluto and Nix/Hydra) and given it's significant mass,...intuitively I suspect that the perturbative effects of Charon on the orbits of Nix and Hydra (and by implication their theoretical lagrange locations), would be so significant that to model them with this 3-body approximation would be unrealistic. (Including the L1,L2,L3 points)

What I suspect is that if they exist at all, stable or semi-stable Lissajous Orbits in the Nix and Hydra systems would be somewhat more complex than in the Earth-Moon system.
"Is a planetary surface the right place for an expanding technological civilization?"
-- Gerard K. O'Neill (1969)

CATALOG SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTING TOOLS LAGRANGE POINTS

MKruer
Posts: 501
Joined: 18.09.2002
With us: 22 years 6 months

Post #42by MKruer » 06.02.2008, 16:33

Gotcha, your question is in the same vein as my highly elliptical orbit question. The more I think about it, the more I think that above graph above is correct. I draw this conclusion because in order to equal the gravitational effects and object speeds for the L3, it would need to have an orbit that is the mirror image of the original orbit.

Brendan
Posts: 296
Joined: 15.07.2003
With us: 21 years 8 months
Location: Bellows Falls, VT
Contact:

Post #43by Brendan » 07.02.2008, 23:49

How come some moons have points in the ssc file like Pan and Metis but can't be found in Celesita?
Specs: 3500 AMD 64, 1GB RAM, PCI Express GeForce 7600 GS with 256MB, Debian Lenny on 250 GB drive, Windows XP Media Center on 250 GB drive

Avatar
Topic author
Chuft-Captain
Posts: 1779
Joined: 18.12.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months

Post #44by Chuft-Captain » 08.02.2008, 01:45

Brendan wrote:How come some moons have points in the ssc file like Pan and Metis but can't be found in Celesita?
Thanks for pointing that out Brendan.
Those moons do not come with the std package. You'll need to download a file called minormoons.ssc from CVS here: http://celestia.cvs.sourceforge.net/cel ... c?view=log

Put it in your extras folder, and those moons (and their L-points) will miraculously appear. :)
"Is a planetary surface the right place for an expanding technological civilization?"
-- Gerard K. O'Neill (1969)

CATALOG SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTING TOOLS LAGRANGE POINTS

Avatar
Topic author
Chuft-Captain
Posts: 1779
Joined: 18.12.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months

Re: Solar System Lagrange Points - FINAL VERSION AVAILABLE

Post #45by Chuft-Captain » 27.03.2009, 03:43

CC wrote:With the improved facilities for marking objects in CELX, I'm thinking of writing a script to mark and label the lagrange points.....

EDIT: This post has been moved to here:
http://shatters.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=13618

Regards
CC
Last edited by Chuft-Captain on 28.03.2009, 13:12, edited 3 times in total.
"Is a planetary surface the right place for an expanding technological civilization?"
-- Gerard K. O'Neill (1969)

CATALOG SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTING TOOLS LAGRANGE POINTS

ajtribick
Developer
Posts: 1855
Joined: 11.08.2003
With us: 21 years 7 months

Re: Solar System Lagrange Points - FINAL VERSION AVAILABLE

Post #46by ajtribick » 27.03.2009, 22:10

The fact that L4 and L5 are unstable at mass ratios greater than 24.96 doesn't mean they do not exist as stationary points. In fact since the L1, L2 and L3 points are always unstable and yet are included, it seems inconsistent to exclude the L4 and L5 points when they too are unstable.

Avatar
Topic author
Chuft-Captain
Posts: 1779
Joined: 18.12.2005
With us: 19 years 3 months

Re: Solar System Lagrange Points - FINAL VERSION AVAILABLE

Post #47by Chuft-Captain » 28.03.2009, 11:42

Andrew,

Thanks for the feedback.
Please see: http://shatters.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=13618&p=113796#p113796

Regards
CC

PS. Don't forget to vote :)
"Is a planetary surface the right place for an expanding technological civilization?"
-- Gerard K. O'Neill (1969)

CATALOG SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTING TOOLS LAGRANGE POINTS


Return to “Add-on development”