Anyone cares for a really bad lok texture of Ceres?
Posted: 26.09.2005, 18:02
Hey, don't hit me too hard. It's my first texture based on reality, which means that I still have a whole lot to learn before I can use effectively the tools at my disposal, which aren't many. I wish I had a software capable of transforming the orthographic projection we get in photos into the plate-carr?©e projection Celestia uses. But I don't. I don't even know if such programs exist outside specialized (and therefore ultimately expensive) software. It's interesting to note, though, how common it is to find programs that wrap things around spheres and so uncommon to find those that can "unrwap" them.
Anyway, enough ranting. Even bad and low-definition as it is, I find this texture useful. I based it on a series of highly pixelated Hubble photos that show about 300?? of the rotation of the planet and on the photo at http://www.astronomy.com/asy/objects/im ... es_800.jpg for the slight red tinge.
Here's the pic. Use it if you don't have enything better or trash it if you do.
Anyway, enough ranting. Even bad and low-definition as it is, I find this texture useful. I based it on a series of highly pixelated Hubble photos that show about 300?? of the rotation of the planet and on the photo at http://www.astronomy.com/asy/objects/im ... es_800.jpg for the slight red tinge.
Here's the pic. Use it if you don't have enything better or trash it if you do.