Page 1 of 1

New UNOFFICIAL OS X Celestia Build (6-29-05)

Posted: 29.06.2005, 11:00
by BlindedByTheLight
Since doctorjoe has kindly tweaked his Celestia patches (and added a few more) I thought I would make a new build available. I don't have a complete list of his additions b/c the site is down now but, if memory serves, he made a new orbit interpolator, fixed a bad memory leak and enabled Celestia to run on some older graphics cards (I'm not sure which).

Also, I took the liberty of adding keyboard short-cuts to the orbit selection menu. This way, you don't have to drop out of full-screen mode or use the mouse to turn off, say, planet orbits or comet orbits individually. A simple COMMAND+SHIFT+P will toggle the planet orbits. COMMAND+SHIFT+A will toggle asteroid orbits and so on. It's actually REALLY cool - and I'm hoping someone makes it a part of the main code so other non-Mac users can enjoy.

The goods are available here:

http://celestiaproject.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7457

Please read all the caveats for this UNOFFICIAL build.

Thanks,
Steve

Posted: 29.06.2005, 11:47
by ElChristou
Many Tx Steven,

Bye

Posted: 29.06.2005, 20:07
by BlindedByTheLight
NOTE TO ALL: I did NOT include the new "foreground orbit fix" that doctorjoe included since my last build - mostly b/c on my computer it created such thick jagged orbit lines. So the orbit "double-lines" orbit problem...

http://celestiaproject.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=55856#55856

...MAY have been fixed in that patch, it's just that this new 6-29 version still has the old patch. However, note this "old patch" does fix the "no orbit lines IN FRONT of planets".

Thank you and enjoy!

Anyway you can post a screenshot?

Posted: 30.06.2005, 23:28
by doctorjoe
Also does the problem exist if you turn off smooth rendering.

Re: Anyway you can post a screenshot?

Posted: 30.06.2005, 23:38
by BlindedByTheLight
doctorjoe wrote:Also does the problem exist if you turn off smooth rendering.


Not sure... I will investigate this and let you know. Thanks.

Re: Anyway you can post a screenshot?

Posted: 01.07.2005, 02:24
by BlindedByTheLight
doctorjoe wrote:opengl has switches to turn on and off things like line smoothing, and its easy to mess up the switches, which is what I think happened.

If you can apply last nights patches, and give me a screen shot, I can fix the problem.

doctorjoe wrote:Also does the problem exist if you turn off smooth rendering.


I applied all patches and tried toggling "line smoothing". Certainly, that makes a difference - but the general problem of the lines being considerably thicker still remains.

This is with the latest patches (with line smoothing ON):

Image

This is with the latest patches (with line smoothing OFF):

Image

This is with your original orbit lines patch:

Image

Note - you may need to download these photos and view at 100% to really see what I'm talking about.

But the old orbit lines were thin and nice... the new ones, whether or not smoothing is on, seem fairly ugly looking "lines" - at least to my eyes (though it's kinda hard to tell with the angle I took with the old patch)... whaddya think?

Thanks.....

Posted: 01.07.2005, 05:06
by doctorjoe
Let me look into this.....

The "thick lines" were unintentional.......

Fixed thick line problem

Posted: 01.07.2005, 05:38
by doctorjoe
The problem came about when I accidentally turned off "blending" of lines. This makes the smooth lines look awful because smooth lines depend on the ability to "smear" an orbit with the background.

That problem is fixed. But there is some "pulsing" which happens when one orbit gets drawn on other and you get this blending.

But that bug was also in my unaltered version of 1.4pre6

One other thing....

Posted: 04.07.2005, 17:51
by doctorjoe
If you see any thing that looks "wrong", it probably is.

...not work with OS X 10.2.x ?

Posted: 05.07.2005, 12:52
by Rich
Hi,
Is it me or does the 6-29 build not work with OS X 10.2.8 as the 6-13 build does? I launch the 6-29 and nothing happens... :(

I'll be upgrading to 10.4 very soon, but in the meantime, I thought I'd ask! :wink:


Thanks,
Rich

celestia on a mini

Posted: 11.07.2005, 13:19
by Startyger
Celestia on a mini (1.4x) works nicely... in fact the best i've seen! Then again.. i was coming from a G4 466 mini tower.. but it had a 128MB video card! and 768MB of RAM... so, it works okay, but the mini has a faster processor.. (and a gig of DDRRAM doesn't hurt) thanks again... looking to try some add ons... now.. where's that black hole... 18 Sco...