Julian date inconsistencies
Posted: 17.08.2006, 18:46
Well, this is not neccecarily a bug in Celestia: it might be a bug in some of the conversion utilities instead - can a developer clarify?
... If i convert a gregorian BCE date to Julian, using the US Naval Observatory??s script found on http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/JulianDate.html, the date is one year wrong compared to Celestia. That is, if Celestia is set to year 1 BCE, the script shows year 2 BCE.
Similarly, if i use the converter at onlineconversion.com
- http://www.onlineconversion.com/julian_date.htm, the result is the same - one year off.
However the script on this page:
http://www.calendarhome.com/converter/
... are in correspondence with Celestia: Year 1 BCE is year 1.
... It seems that the two first scripts treats 0 - zero - as a year. If so, that is a bad bug. Or is it actually a bug in Celestia?
- rthorvald
... If i convert a gregorian BCE date to Julian, using the US Naval Observatory??s script found on http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/JulianDate.html, the date is one year wrong compared to Celestia. That is, if Celestia is set to year 1 BCE, the script shows year 2 BCE.
Similarly, if i use the converter at onlineconversion.com
- http://www.onlineconversion.com/julian_date.htm, the result is the same - one year off.
However the script on this page:
http://www.calendarhome.com/converter/
... are in correspondence with Celestia: Year 1 BCE is year 1.
... It seems that the two first scripts treats 0 - zero - as a year. If so, that is a bad bug. Or is it actually a bug in Celestia?
- rthorvald