Best Sun ever seen!

Report bugs, bug fixes and workarounds here.
Topic author
ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Best Sun ever seen!

Post #1by ElChristou » 03.12.2006, 16:34

Yep, this is the best Sun ever rendered on my config...
...too bad it's a bug using scaled disk... :x

Now as such a rendering is possible (and this is not OGL2.0), why not using it in every paths and star styles? (it would be excellent...)

Image
Image

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months

Post #2by Malenfant » 03.12.2006, 17:11

It does look a lot more realistic... I think that's the trick really - have a pure white star with a limb that is tinted the colour of the star. I dunno if the 'haze/flare' around it is realistic but it does make it a lot more real-looking.

I mean, that actually makes me want to shade my eyes from the glare, unlike the default sun that comes with celestia, that looks like a dim mottled sphere.
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system

Avatar
Chuft-Captain
Posts: 1779
Joined: 18.12.2005
With us: 18 years 11 months

Post #3by Chuft-Captain » 04.12.2006, 10:18

Another interesting feature of this image (at least on my laptop screen) is that if I grab the scrollbar and slide it up and down, the image of the sun itself appears to "bob" up and down within the image.
Not sure if this is due to a "lag" in the LCD screen, or in my retina, but freaky either way! :wink:

Try it for yourself. :lol:
"Is a planetary surface the right place for an expanding technological civilization?"
-- Gerard K. O'Neill (1969)

CATALOG SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTING TOOLS LAGRANGE POINTS

Topic author
ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Post #4by ElChristou » 04.12.2006, 13:34

Malenfant wrote:...I mean, that actually makes me want to shade my eyes from the glare...


True, it's what I like with this rendering!
Image

ANDREA
Posts: 1543
Joined: 01.06.2002
With us: 22 years 5 months
Location: Rome, ITALY

Post #5by ANDREA » 04.12.2006, 14:59

ElChristou wrote:True, it's what I like with this rendering!

Me too! :wink:
Is it available somewhere, please?
Bye

Andrea :D
"Something is always better than nothing!"
HP Omen 15-DC1040nl- Intel® Core i7 9750H, 2.6/4.5 GHz- 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD+ 1TB SATA 6 SSD- 32GB SDRAM DDR4 2666 MHz- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB-WIN 11 PRO

Topic author
ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Post #6by ElChristou » 04.12.2006, 15:51

ANDREA wrote:
ElChristou wrote:True, it's what I like with this rendering!
Me too! :wink:
Is it available somewhere, please?


No, Andrea, this is a BUG... the Sun in reality is very tiny in relation with this glowing sphere...
Image

Malenfant
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24.08.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months

Post #7by Malenfant » 04.12.2006, 16:15

ElChristou wrote:
ANDREA wrote:
ElChristou wrote:True, it's what I like with this rendering!
Me too! :wink:
Is it available somewhere, please?

No, Andrea, this is a BUG... the Sun in reality is very tiny in relation with this glowing sphere...


Well, it'd be nice if it was the size it was supposed to be and looked like that... ;)

Maybe this is one of those accidental useful discoveries, like Penicillin ;)
My Celestia page: Spica system, planetary magnitudes script, updated demo.cel, Quad system

Topic author
ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Post #8by ElChristou » 04.12.2006, 16:45

I'm wondering what are the benefits of the new star rendering (only available under OGL2.0) when such a "not so bad" result can be achieve in older render paths...
Perhaps performances?
Image

chris
Site Admin
Posts: 4211
Joined: 28.01.2002
With us: 22 years 9 months
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA

Post #9by chris » 05.12.2006, 17:52

ElChristou wrote:I'm wondering what are the benefits of the new star rendering (only available under OGL2.0) when such a "not so bad" result can be achieve in older render paths...
Perhaps performances?


The new star rendering does not require OpenGL 2.0; it does need support for vertex programs and point sprites. Performance is one of the main benefits.

--Chris

Topic author
ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Post #10by ElChristou » 05.12.2006, 19:22

chris wrote:
ElChristou wrote:I'm wondering what are the benefits of the new star rendering (only available under OGL2.0) when such a "not so bad" result can be achieve in older render paths...
Perhaps performances?

The new star rendering does not require OpenGL 2.0; it does need support for vertex programs and point sprites. Performance is one of the main benefits.

--Chris


Oups, true... point sprites are my problem...
Image

Topic author
ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Post #11by ElChristou » 06.12.2006, 23:26

Just a few miliseconds before Saturn was washed out by the Sol Nova...

Image

:wink:
Image


Return to “Bugs”