Constellation of Aldebaran and the Hyades 1600 BC
Posted: 03.03.2006, 19:46
Hello,
I like to simulate the Constellation of the "lying V" in TAURIS (Aldebaran/Hyaden) in the Year 1600 BC.
How does that "lying V" exactly look like, 3600 Years before now? I mean, the different stars of that "lying V" have moved since that time, so the absolute as well as the relative position of these stars must have changed a bit.
I am told in a newsgroup, that chelestia should do that trick, but I do not know how. I changed the time to -1600, but the position of the stars seemed not to be changed.
Can anybody tell me, how to do that trick? Or, is anybody here qualified to calculate the visible constellation of these stars 1600 BC?
The background of my question is, that I suppose these stars to be charactered on the sky disk of nebra, in addition to the Pleades that are obviously charactered on another place on that disk (the sky disk of nebra is dated 1600 BC).
The similarity of these golden point with the constellation of these stars today is not to high, but I suppose for different reasons, why this could character Aldebaran with the Haydes (rsp. the "lying V").
Now I try to falsificate my thesis via comparing the real constellation 3600 years ago with these golden points on the sky disk. On the other hand, my thesis would gain enormous plausibility, if these golden points on the sky disk, that I suppose to charakter the "lying V" in TAURIS, looks like the real constellation of these stars 3600 years ago.
cf. http://www.analogika.info/nebra/#bild15
Thanks for any help,
Harald Gr?¤nzer, Berlin/Germany
hagrae[at]arcor<dot>de
I like to simulate the Constellation of the "lying V" in TAURIS (Aldebaran/Hyaden) in the Year 1600 BC.
How does that "lying V" exactly look like, 3600 Years before now? I mean, the different stars of that "lying V" have moved since that time, so the absolute as well as the relative position of these stars must have changed a bit.
I am told in a newsgroup, that chelestia should do that trick, but I do not know how. I changed the time to -1600, but the position of the stars seemed not to be changed.
Can anybody tell me, how to do that trick? Or, is anybody here qualified to calculate the visible constellation of these stars 1600 BC?
The background of my question is, that I suppose these stars to be charactered on the sky disk of nebra, in addition to the Pleades that are obviously charactered on another place on that disk (the sky disk of nebra is dated 1600 BC).
The similarity of these golden point with the constellation of these stars today is not to high, but I suppose for different reasons, why this could character Aldebaran with the Haydes (rsp. the "lying V").
Now I try to falsificate my thesis via comparing the real constellation 3600 years ago with these golden points on the sky disk. On the other hand, my thesis would gain enormous plausibility, if these golden points on the sky disk, that I suppose to charakter the "lying V" in TAURIS, looks like the real constellation of these stars 3600 years ago.
cf. http://www.analogika.info/nebra/#bild15
Thanks for any help,
Harald Gr?¤nzer, Berlin/Germany
hagrae[at]arcor<dot>de