HippLiner: direct competition with Celestia?

General discussion about Celestia that doesn't fit into other forums.
Avatar
Topic author
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 3 months
Location: NY, USA

HippLiner: direct competition with Celestia?

Post #1by selden » 19.02.2003, 02:38

Actually it isn't even close, but it does provide another way to browse the Hipparcos database.

http://t.nomoto.org/HippLiner/index-e.html
Selden

Matt McIrvin
Posts: 312
Joined: 04.03.2002
With us: 22 years 9 months

Motion

Post #2by Matt McIrvin » 19.02.2003, 03:06

Interesting. One thing it can do that Celestia can't is plot the motion of the stars. Of course it's probably just a linear extrapolation of current velocities; I think the reason Chris left this out was that he would prefer to do it more realistically with some kind of dynamical model. Still, I've always wanted something like that in Celestia, and a linear model would provide a fair approximation for a few thousand years.

Too bad it's only for Windows.

Guest

another reply

Post #3by Guest » 19.02.2003, 08:49

I tried this program and it is too confusing for me to look at anymore. maybe when I've got real lot of time on my hands. 8O

Guest

Motion

Post #4by Guest » 20.02.2003, 20:49

Selden wrote:[Competition]

I don't think so. It looks like a research tool gone graphical. There have been plenty of 3D starmaps along those lines for years (chview, etc), but Celestia is likely the first to be very popular (I think; I have no idea how popular, say, StarStrider is).

Matt McIrvin wrote:Interesting. One thing it can do that Celestia can't is plot the motion of the stars. Of course it's probably just a linear extrapolation of current velocities; I think the reason Chris left this out was that he would prefer to do it more realistically with some kind of dynamical model. Still, I've always wanted something like that in Celestia, and a linear model would provide a fair approximation for a few thousand years.


A linear model is perfectly sufficient until you get into the tens of thousands of years range. I don't see that assuming a particular dynamical model would increase "realism", since you introduce extra unknowns beyond the data (the properties of the dynamical model).


Return to “Celestia Users”