Corrupted video capture

General discussion about Celestia that doesn't fit into other forums.
Avatar
Topic author
Chuft-Captain
Posts: 1779
Joined: 18.12.2005
With us: 18 years 11 months

Corrupted video capture

Post #1by Chuft-Captain » 14.01.2008, 15:41

Hi all,

I am experiencing problems capturing video from Celestia (1.5.0pre5).

I am capturing @ 640x480, Microsoft AVI, uncompressed for up to a minute of video.
This results in a file up to 3.5 GB, but it is corrupted. It will not open in any editing SW. ("Windows Media Player encountered an unknown error.", "File reading error" in ULEAD VideoStudio )
Earlier I captured a 1.2 GB file which I think was also corrupt, but I've managed to do a 300MB one with no problems.

Now I'm not sure if this is a bug or limitation in openGL video API, or if Windows XP itself just has problems with files of this size. (Also diskspace is getting very low due to the 3.5 GB file, which probably doesn't help :wink: )

I can do smaller captures of 20-30 secs, but I'm not sure where the cutoff between success and failure lies, largely because of the following...

Due to FPS limitations of my hardware (64MB shared video, 1.2 GB RAM, 1.5Ghz processor) I find that I usually have to set timerate to -2X or -4X in order to capture relatively smooth video.
This means I may have to wait for 20 minutes to capture 1 minute of video, which turns out to be un-usable due to the problem above.

Would anyone (preferably with a similar config to me) be able to try and replicate this problem. I'd like to know if it's actually a bug, or just my config.

Cheers
CC
"Is a planetary surface the right place for an expanding technological civilization?"
-- Gerard K. O'Neill (1969)

CATALOG SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTING TOOLS LAGRANGE POINTS

ANDREA
Posts: 1543
Joined: 01.06.2002
With us: 22 years 5 months
Location: Rome, ITALY

Post #2by ANDREA » 14.01.2008, 18:54

This is strange.
I just made a check as follows:
file avi 640x480, no compression, a bit more than 1 minute, about 1.7 GB, tested on Windows Madia Player, Media Player Classic and VLC Media Player, and this is the result:
all performed very well, without any problem. 8O
I fear the problem is yours, not of 1.5.0pre5, sorry. :cry:
My little cent.
Bye

Andrea :D
"Something is always better than nothing!"
HP Omen 15-DC1040nl- Intel® Core i7 9750H, 2.6/4.5 GHz- 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD+ 1TB SATA 6 SSD- 32GB SDRAM DDR4 2666 MHz- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB-WIN 11 PRO

Avatar
cartrite
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.09.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months
Location: Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA Greate Grandfother from Irshava, Zakarpattia Oblast Ukraine

Post #3by cartrite » 14.01.2008, 19:32

1.7 GB. Man. You guys should think about getting linux. I can capture a full screen 1280x892 video for over a minute and it's about 100 mb.
cartrite
VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Intel(R) UHD Graphics 8gb ram. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 CPU @ 1.00GHz, 1190 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s) 8 GB ram. Running on Windows 11 and OpenSuse 15.4

chris
Site Admin
Posts: 4211
Joined: 28.01.2002
With us: 22 years 9 months
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA

Post #4by chris » 14.01.2008, 19:37

cartrite wrote:1.7 GB. Man. You guys should think about getting linux. I can capture a full screen 1280x892 video for over a minute and it's about 100 mb.
cartrite


You can do the same on Windows too--it all depends on the codec that you use.

--Chris

ANDREA
Posts: 1543
Joined: 01.06.2002
With us: 22 years 5 months
Location: Rome, ITALY

Post #5by ANDREA » 14.01.2008, 19:40

cartrite wrote:1.7 GB. Man. You guys should think about getting linux. I can capture a full screen 1280x892 video for over a minute and it's about 100 mb. cartrite

This makes me a bit curious.
What a kind of compression are you using?
Is it a Linux proprietary codec, or not?
I think, but may be badly wrong, that if you make the same test in the same way (640x480 NO COMPRESSION AVI output file) you'll obtain the same results, even with Linux.
Or not? 8O 8O 8O
Bye

Andrea :D
"Something is always better than nothing!"
HP Omen 15-DC1040nl- Intel® Core i7 9750H, 2.6/4.5 GHz- 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD+ 1TB SATA 6 SSD- 32GB SDRAM DDR4 2666 MHz- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB-WIN 11 PRO

Avatar
cartrite
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.09.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months
Location: Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA Greate Grandfother from Irshava, Zakarpattia Oblast Ukraine

Post #6by cartrite » 14.01.2008, 19:51

chris wrote:
cartrite wrote:1.7 GB. Man. You guys should think about getting linux. I can capture a full screen 1280x892 video for over a minute and it's about 100 mb.
cartrite

You can do the same on Windows too--it all depends on the codec that you use.

--Chris
Is it possible for Windows Celestia to use xvid? How ? I go through a lot to convert the theora vids to avi with the xvid codec so they can be played on windows media player.
cartrite
VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Intel(R) UHD Graphics 8gb ram. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 CPU @ 1.00GHz, 1190 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s) 8 GB ram. Running on Windows 11 and OpenSuse 15.4

Avatar
cartrite
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.09.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months
Location: Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA Greate Grandfother from Irshava, Zakarpattia Oblast Ukraine

Post #7by cartrite » 14.01.2008, 19:52

ANDREA wrote:
cartrite wrote:1.7 GB. Man. You guys should think about getting linux. I can capture a full screen 1280x892 video for over a minute and it's about 100 mb. cartrite
This makes me a bit curious.
What a kind of compression are you using?
Is it a Linux proprietary codec, or not?
I think, but may be badly wrong, that if you make the same test in the same way (640x480 NO COMPRESSION AVI output file) you'll obtain the same results, even with Linux.
Or not? 8O 8O 8O
Bye

Andrea :D

It is all about compression. Raw vids will be large no matter what.
cartrite
VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Intel(R) UHD Graphics 8gb ram. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 CPU @ 1.00GHz, 1190 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s) 8 GB ram. Running on Windows 11 and OpenSuse 15.4

Avatar
cartrite
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.09.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months
Location: Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA Greate Grandfother from Irshava, Zakarpattia Oblast Ukraine

Post #8by cartrite » 14.01.2008, 20:16

chris wrote:
cartrite wrote:1.7 GB. Man. You guys should think about getting linux. I can capture a full screen 1280x892 video for over a minute and it's about 100 mb.
cartrite

You can do the same on Windows too--it all depends on the codec that you use.

--Chris
Man do I feel dumb. I just checked out the video capture in celestia 1.5pre5 and it was so simple...........
I just did a vid 1 minute 20 seconds at 1024x768 with the xvid codec. 18.1 mb. The image quality looks great!!!!!!
Here is a screenshot of the video capture qui. Pretty impressive.

Image


Chuft Captain, you say you are doing your vids uncompressed. Isn't there any other codecs available? Maybe you should install the xvid mpeg4 codec. http://www.xvid.org/Downloads.15.0.html
cartrite
VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Intel(R) UHD Graphics 8gb ram. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 CPU @ 1.00GHz, 1190 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s) 8 GB ram. Running on Windows 11 and OpenSuse 15.4

Avatar
Topic author
Chuft-Captain
Posts: 1779
Joined: 18.12.2005
With us: 18 years 11 months

Post #9by Chuft-Captain » 15.01.2008, 08:26

Thanks for the feedback guys.
It's actually good to know the problem's at my end (because I can then do something about it, hopefully). :wink:

Cartrite, thanks for the link. I might give that Xvid codec a try. My choices at the moment are a little limited. The reason I was capturing uncompressed is because I want to edit and add titles, so best to start with highest quality. Adding titles to already compressed divX for example, causes considerable loss of quality. (I think because of the double compression).

My final output after titling is usually in DivX 5.0 and MPG.

Perhaps this Xvid will be high enough quality that I can start with it prior to editing, without too much loss of quality in the second generation.

Hopefully this codec will solve my issues and it's not an underlying problem with my hardware.

EDIT: What's with the really annoying "HELLLOOO!" at the linked download website? (http://www.digital-digest.com/software/ ... id=0&did=1)

Cheers
CC
"Is a planetary surface the right place for an expanding technological civilization?"
-- Gerard K. O'Neill (1969)

CATALOG SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTING TOOLS LAGRANGE POINTS

Avatar
cartrite
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.09.2005
With us: 19 years 2 months
Location: Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA Greate Grandfother from Irshava, Zakarpattia Oblast Ukraine

Post #10by cartrite » 15.01.2008, 14:29

Chuft-Captain wrote:EDIT: What's with the really annoying "HELLLOOO!" at the linked download website? (http://www.digital-digest.com/software/ ... id=0&did=1)

Cheers
CC
I wasn't sure what you meant until I turned the sound on. Yeah that is annoying. I never use the computer with the sound on unless there is a need. Like watching something that I want to listen to. Very rare.
cartrite
VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Intel(R) UHD Graphics 8gb ram. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 CPU @ 1.00GHz, 1190 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s) 8 GB ram. Running on Windows 11 and OpenSuse 15.4


Return to “Celestia Users”