movie size in the capture tool
movie size in the capture tool
Hi to all,
first of all thanx for this wonderful programme...
This might be a newbee question but I have to try. Since I am not really good at scripting and surely not fast, I would like to know if there is an easy way to capture movies larger then the suggested 720 x 576.
Thanx for any help.
first of all thanx for this wonderful programme...
This might be a newbee question but I have to try. Since I am not really good at scripting and surely not fast, I would like to know if there is an easy way to capture movies larger then the suggested 720 x 576.
Thanx for any help.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4211
- Joined: 28.01.2002
- With us: 22 years 10 months
- Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Re: movie size in the capture tool
skoe wrote:Hi to all,
first of all thanx for this wonderful programme...
This might be a newbee question but I have to try. Since I am not really good at scripting and surely not fast, I would like to know if there is an easy way to capture movies larger then the suggested 720 x 576.
Thanx for any help.
I was just looking at adding larger sizes. I believe that the HD standards are 1280x720 and 1920x1080--are either of those what you're looking for?
--Chris
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: 14.02.2006
- Age: 52
- With us: 18 years 9 months
- Location: Skepplanda, Sweden
Re: movie size in the capture tool
chris wrote:skoe wrote:Hi to all,
first of all thanx for this wonderful programme...
This might be a newbee question but I have to try. Since I am not really good at scripting and surely not fast, I would like to know if there is an easy way to capture movies larger then the suggested 720 x 576.
Thanx for any help.
I was just looking at adding larger sizes. I believe that the HD standards are 1280x720 and 1920x1080--are either of those what you're looking for?
--Chris
That would be cool. and maybe also 1024x768 so that there isn't a big jump in resolution from 720x576 -> 1280x720.
Bye, Anders
-
- Posts: 1510
- Joined: 07.09.2002
- Age: 59
- With us: 22 years 2 months
- Location: Albany, Oregon
This would be cool. I wanted to use Celestia to reate a Dreamscene for Vista, but the lower resolution was stopping me.
I hope you can add this soon.
Don. Edwards
I hope you can add this soon.
Don. Edwards
I am officially a retired member.
I might answer a PM or a post if its relevant to something.
Ah, never say never!!
Past texture releases, Hmm let me think about it
Thanks for your understanding.
I might answer a PM or a post if its relevant to something.
Ah, never say never!!
Past texture releases, Hmm let me think about it
Thanks for your understanding.
- Chuft-Captain
- Posts: 1779
- Joined: 18.12.2005
- With us: 18 years 11 months
Chris, I assume this will be limited by our specific hardware's video/display resolution?chris wrote:Don. Edwards wrote:This would be cool. I wanted to use Celestia to reate a Dreamscene for Vista, but the lower resolution was stopping me.
I hope you can add this soon.
It will be in 1.5.0pre4.
--Chris
ie. Will it be possible to capture either still or video at a resolution higher than that displayed on my machine. I'd like for example to create wallpapers for my screen at work on my home machine which has a lower resolution than that at work. This may also allow the creation of higher-res captures targetted at those users more well endowed (in the resolution department) than I am.
BTW: Is it possible (either now or in the future) to capture screenshots (stills) for dual-screen formats. eg. 2 1280x1024 screens side by side requires a 2560x1024 image.
As far as I can tell, Celestia cannot display across a dual screen config. (At least not for me)
PS. What I'd really like to be able to do when capturing a jpg, is to specify an arbitrary resolution which may be larger than the current screen resolution. Is this asking a bit much?
Regards
CC
Last edited by Chuft-Captain on 23.05.2007, 12:09, edited 1 time in total.
"Is a planetary surface the right place for an expanding technological civilization?"
-- Gerard K. O'Neill (1969)
CATALOG SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTING TOOLS LAGRANGE POINTS
-- Gerard K. O'Neill (1969)
CATALOG SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTING TOOLS LAGRANGE POINTS
Re: movie size in the capture tool
chris wrote:skoe wrote:Hi to all,
first of all thanx for this wonderful programme...
This might be a newbee question but I have to try. Since I am not really good at scripting and surely not fast, I would like to know if there is an easy way to capture movies larger then the suggested 720 x 576.
Thanx for any help.
I was just looking at adding larger sizes. I believe that the HD standards are 1280x720 and 1920x1080--are either of those what you're looking for?
--Chris
As anybody else already said - this would be very cool, esp. the 1920x1080.
Could you tell a rough time schedule for the new version?
- cartrite
- Posts: 1978
- Joined: 15.09.2005
- With us: 19 years 2 months
- Location: Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA Greate Grandfother from Irshava, Zakarpattia Oblast Ukraine
The linux KDE version can capture larger video's now. A video of a model I did that was converted to avi for Windows Media Player with mplayer's mencoder. It has a screen size of 1280 x 892. The original format is in ogg / theora format.
cartrite
cartrite
VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Intel(R) UHD Graphics 8gb ram. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 CPU @ 1.00GHz, 1190 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s) 8 GB ram. Running on Windows 11 and OpenSuse 15.4
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4211
- Joined: 28.01.2002
- With us: 22 years 10 months
- Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Chuft-Captain wrote:Chris, I assume this will be limited by our specific hardware's video/display resolution?chris wrote:Don. Edwards wrote:This would be cool. I wanted to use Celestia to reate a Dreamscene for Vista, but the lower resolution was stopping me.
I hope you can add this soon.
It will be in 1.5.0pre4.
--Chris
ie. Will it be possible to capture either still or video at a resolution higher than that displayed on my machine. I'd like for example to create wallpapers for my screen at work on my home machine which has a lower resolution than that at work. This may also allow the creation of higher-res captures targetted at those users more well endowed (in the resolution department) than I am.
BTW: Is it possible (either now or in the future) to capture screenshots (stills) for dual-screen formats. eg. 2 1280x1024 screens side by side requires a 2560x1024 image.
As far as I can tell, Celestia cannot display across a dual screen config. (At least not for me)
I've had Celestia working properly across multiple screen, though I've never true to capture an image when it was in such a configuration.
PS. What I'd really like to be able to do when capturing a jpg, is to specify an arbitrary resolution which may be larger than the current screen resolution. Is this asking a bit much?
It's a very reasonable request, but unfortunately I won't have time to work on it for a while. You should add it to the tracker on SourceForge (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_ ... tid=371302) so that it's not forgotten.
--Chris
-
- Developer
- Posts: 944
- Joined: 18.07.2002
- With us: 22 years 4 months
- Location: Lyon (France)
chris wrote:I've had Celestia working properly across multiple screen, though I've never true to capture an image when it was in such a configuration.Chuft-Captain wrote:As far as I can tell, Celestia cannot display across a dual screen config. (At least not for me)
It does work on Linux, although you have to manualy extend the window to cover both screens.
On the other hand, doing a capture on a window bigger than the screen results in blackened out areas.
Christophe
Just to through my 2 cents into all of this. The visual difference between 720 and 1080 is hardly noticable. Note I said visual. What makes the biggest difference is if it is interlaced or progressive scanned. I am assuming that the capture would be progressive since that is what the computer monitors and video cards are running. So if you need to pick which resolution to do first the 720 would be good enough IMO. Maybe this is not an issue as far as the programing side I don't know. On the standard definition side I vote for the 1024X768 size.
Don
Don
Don't know anything
-
- Developer
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: 04.02.2005
- With us: 19 years 9 months
chris wrote:Don. Edwards wrote:This would be cool. I wanted to use Celestia to reate a Dreamscene for Vista, but the lower resolution was stopping me.
I hope you can add this soon.
It will be in 1.5.0pre4.
--Chris
Is HD implemented? The info is needed to fix and issue on the Celestia's page @ Wikipedia... (I cannot see it in the change log...)
-
- Developer
- Posts: 944
- Joined: 18.07.2002
- With us: 22 years 4 months
- Location: Lyon (France)
-
- Developer
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: 04.02.2005
- With us: 19 years 9 months
-
- Developer
- Posts: 944
- Joined: 18.07.2002
- With us: 22 years 4 months
- Location: Lyon (France)